Wednesday, 8 April 2026
Anna Wintour shares Vogue cover with Hollywood doppelganger Meryl Streep
Anna
Wintour shares Vogue cover with Hollywood doppelganger Meryl Streep
Vogue’s
global editorial director says Streep’s character in The Devil Wears Prada
‘distant’ from the real her
Sammy
Gecsoyler
Tue 7 Apr
2026 19.35 BST
https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2026/apr/07/former-vogue-editor-anna-wintour-cover-meryl-streep
After
more than 30 years helming Vogue, and becoming a pop icon in the process, Anna
Wintour has graced the cover of the fashion magazine alongside her Hollywood
doppelganger, Meryl Streep.
The
global editorial director of Vogue is photographed by Annie Leibovitz alongside
Streep, who plays Miranda Priestly in The Devil Wears Prada, a brash, ruthless
editor of a fashion magazine thought to be based on Wintour.
In an
interview by the Barbie director, Greta Gerwig, Wintour said it was “such an
honour to be played by Meryl” but suggested the character of Priestly was
“distant” from the real Wintour. She called the character an “extraordinary
gift”.
She said:
“I like my age. I feel as alive, excited and aware as ever, and I like to learn
from my children and from all my teams around the world. It’s always exciting.
“And I
think with experience, you have a sense of balance and proportion, and you know
that life is not perfect and that things will go wrong and you’re just going to
give it your best shot. But if it doesn’t work, you have to move on. I feel age
is actually an advantage.”
Asked how
she would feel about swapping jobs with Streep, Wintour said: “There’s no way.
I have no gifts. I have absolutely no gifts at all. I can’t sing, I can’t
dance, I can’t act, I’m useless with my hands, I can’t cook, I certainly can’t
sew.”
The Devil
Wears Prada is based on the novel of the same name by Lauren Weisberger, who
had been Wintour’s assistant at Vogue. The film starred Anne Hathaway as an
aspiring reporter who secures a post as a lackey to the ice-cold editor of the
fictional publication Runway. The Devil Wears Prada 2, a sequel to the 2006
original, is out in cinemas next month.
Wintour
has previously given a more mixed reaction to the character. Speaking to the
New Yorker editor, David Remnick, on a podcast, she said: “I went to the
premiere wearing Prada, completely having no idea what the film was going to be
about.”
Remnick
suggested it was “cartoonish”, to which Wintour agreed, adding: “Yes, a
caricature.” But Wintour said she was surprised by the subtlety of the
portrayal, and impressed more generally by the film.
“I found
it highly enjoyable. It was very funny,” she said. “Miuccia [Prada] and I talk
about it a lot, and I say to her: ‘Well, it was really good for you.’”
Wintour
and Streep may share more than a Hollywood portrayal. A genealogy report by
Ancestry has claimed they are sixth cousins.
Tuesday, 7 April 2026
Monday, 6 April 2026
Sunday, 5 April 2026
Saturday, 4 April 2026
From Teddy Boys to the Tardy Book: What Eton was really like in the Good Old Days
Features
From Teddy
Boys to the Tardy Book: What Eton was really like in the Good Old Days
Nicky
Haslam, who attended Eton in the Fifties, recalls the days of beaks,
fag-masters and dames
By Tatler
13 August
2018
Eton in the
Fifties
https://www.tatler.com/article/obsoletonians-eton-in-the-fifties
We were a
fairly uniform lot, the intake to Eton in the first years of the 1950s. Echoes
– even visions – of the war shaped our youthful minds. Bomb damage still
blighted cities, tattered blackouts still flapped on buildings, rationing was
still in force. The angular modernity of the Festival of Britain had barely
pierced our teen consciousness. Perhaps, assimilated from our elders, we hoped
against hope that the future would return to a version of a not-yet-forgotten
past.
So there we
were, fresh out of boys’ school, overawed by the size and splendour and age of
our new surroundings, by a sense of self, of horizons and of space – your own
room, from day one, after regimented, dingy confines in sandy Surrey. One might
be scared or lonely, miss Nanny or one’s dog, but soon came a visceral
challenge, to grapple with emerging adulthood.
We quickly
learned the rules, or rather customs. We dutifully prepared our Saying Lesson
before Lights Out, we got up at seven for Early School, went to Absence (in
fact, presence), then Chapel. We ate revolting Boys Dinner in the allotted 20
minutes before doing battle on the Playing Fields of Sixpenny, or dragged
padded grey-flannel shorts down to Boats. We noted the swagger of sixth-form
boys, seemingly wildly grown-up, and were careful to do nothing that might
single one out to the gods of Pop. We skeltered to Boy-Calls, we skivvied for
Fag-Masters, we cleaned their Corps boots, we flattered Tutors, we oiled up to
dames, we ‘capped’ all beaks. And we were drunk with relief on graduating from
Remove to Upper School.
What all
this taught us was to be polite, have good manners, to show respect. Even so
vast an institution was essentially intimate: we formed a mutual bond, didn’t
feel superior, although we scoffed slightly at Tugs (scholarship boys), jealous
of their cleverness rather than snobbism. This bonding was essential as there
was almost no recreation besides sports – except, thank God, the Drawing
Schools. There were no foreigners, though one raven-haired beauty was rumoured
to be half-Egyptian. ‘Crumbs! Egyptian!’ we whispered as he passed. There was
no swimming pool, no theatre (concerts, or plays, usually Shakespeare, were
desultory affairs in School Hall), no cinema, no medicines (my dame believed in
a scant thimble of brandy as a cure-all), no cameras or Coca-Cola, no radios,
TV or gramophones, and most certainly no drinking or smoking – sackable
offences.
These
privations weren’t exclusively because we were at Eton. There wasn’t, anywhere,
pop music, nor young singing idols (though we knew girls who swooned at Johnny
Ray and later jiggled about to Bill Haley), no new humour, no dark Nouvelle
Vague films, no Going Abroad, put paid to by a £50 take-abroad limit: the
theatre was Anna Neagle comedies, artists were in Paris; nightclubs were for
one’s parents’ friends, smooching to Edmundo Ros; clothes hadn’t changed in
decades, jeans were unheard of. There was no street life we yearned to emulate
(though Teddy boys did have a certain allure), no social level to step down to.
Drugs were unknown; Du Maurier cork-tips made one dizzy; whisky in quantity
unexpectedly made one sick, putting a sticky end to that fumble with the deb we
were trying to delight. Thus we had no good reason to believe holidays would be
a panacea of excitement, just more huntin’/shootin’/fishin’ and going to the
circus at Christmas, along with finding out that we were even more tongue-tied
with girls, Nanny wasn’t indispensable, and your sister had adopted your dog.
And beyond?
There was no gap year. Instead National Service loomed, then Oxford or
Cambridge beckoned the brainier, a Guards regiment the rest, and – to the very
few – the unmentionable thrall of a more lilac life in an almost club-like gay
milieu. For four or five years, Eton consumed our whole being. But some of us
understood that we had a lifetime ahead in which to roll, and rock, in the
gutter.
Friday, 3 April 2026
Thursday, 2 April 2026
58 years old - 28 years, 6 months and 26 days old ...
BACK TO THE ANDY WARHOL MANSION

MTV President Splurges on Warhol's 66th Street MansionBy Deborah Schoeneman and Carmela Ciuraru
January 23, 2000 | 7:00 p.m
Andy Warhol lived at 57 East 66th Street from 1974 until his death in 1987, dwelling there longer than anyone who has since tried to call the town house home–first a Spanish family and then an American gentleman. Maybe they were spooked by the secret trap door in the master bedroom or tales of the sordid findings of the appraisers who scoured the place after Warhol's death: green boxes of wings stacked near a television set, a medicine cabinet filled with makeup tubes and perfume bottles, and women's jewelry nestled in the four-poster canopy bed.
Now it's Tom Freston's turn. The Warhol mansion was purchased by the chairman of MTV for around $6.5 million in early January. Mr. Freston confirmed that he purchased the house, but did not wish to comment.
The 8,000-square-foot house is a hefty piece of memorabilia. Warhol bought it for $310,000 and hired decorator Jed Johnson. Together they merged their tastes in art deco with primitive contemporary paintings (none of his own) and religious emblems. Soon after Warhol's death, someone stole the street number–57–from the facade. (That prompted the Spanish family who purchased the house from Warhol's estate to erect a gate out front, which has since been removed.) On Aug. 6, 1998, in celebration of Mr. Warhol's 70th birthday, Barbaralee Diamonstein-Spielvogel's Historic Landmark Preservation Center dedicated a plaque to the town house to honor the artist–the first memorial to Warhol in the city. There was, of course, a large gathering in front of the residence for the occasion.
One broker considers $6.5 million a fair price. "It's a great old house," the broker said. "Andy never did a major rehab of it. He left a lot of detail that people appreciate like trade moldings and fireplaces." The Spanish family paid the estate $3 million, but never moved in, and the last owner, who purchased the house in 1993 for $3.35 million, did some upgrading but kept the architecture intact.
The five-and-a-half-story neoclassical house has four bedrooms, a library with Juliet balconies, six fireplaces, central air-conditioning and an elevator.
Vincent Fremont, a friend of Warhol's, remembers house-sitting for the artist while he was in Japan for two weeks in 1974. "Very few people ever got into the house. It was a private hideaway," he said. "It had a nice parlor, a staircase and a formal dining room, which Andy never used after the late 70's because he liked to eat in the downstairs kitchen."
Mr. Freston and Warhol met over Warhol's television show Fifteen Minutes , said Mr. Fremont, who produced the show. Fifteen Minutes ran on MTV from 1986 to 1987. "It's kind of interesting that after all these years he bought it," said Mr. Fremont. "It's kind of terrific."
The fate of Mr. Freston's TriBeCa condominium on the top floor of 39 North Moore Street, which he bought in 1994, is unknown.




Wednesday, 1 April 2026
Queen Elizabeth II: The remarkable life of our nation's most beloved monarch captured by 'the most knowledgeable royal biographer on the planet' - by Hugo Vickers (Author)
Queen Elizabeth II: The remarkable life of our
nation's most beloved monarch captured by 'the most knowledgeable royal
biographer on the planet' - Financial Times Hardcover – 9 April 2026
by Hugo Vickers (Author)
THE MAJOR
NEW BIOGRAPHY OF THE LATE QUEEN.
'Impeccably
researched . . . Hugo Vickers offers us his piercing insights into the
innermost workings of the Royal family' - DAILY MAIL
'Based on
six decades of close observation . . . a portrait of the steadfast woman who
long wore the crown' - THE TIMES, 'BOOKS TO WATCH IN 2026'
'Royal
historian Hugo Vickers brings together a lifetime's worth of anecdotes in this
"personal" biography, which draws on 60 years' worth of research as
well as never-before-seen sources' - THE TELEGRAPH, 'BOOKS TO WATCH IN 2026'
Queen
Elizabeth II occupies a unique place in the hearts of her people, and in this
new, revelatory biography, acclaimed royal historian Hugo Vickers sheds new
light on the woman behind the crown.
Even as a
child, Elizabeth was elegant, self-contained, and enigmatic. After a supremely
happy childhood, gravitas descended with the death of her beloved grandfather
and the Abdication of her uncle Edward VIII. As Vickers reveals in impeccable
prose, she accepted her destiny and worked steadfastly to prepare for what was
to come. On her twenty-first birthday in 1947, she made a promise to serve and
kept it for a remarkable 75 years. She was steadfast and conciliatory and
presided calmly over decades of change, political upheaval and family tragedy.
This
major new biography is based on sixty years of close observation and research,
and uses never-before-seen sources and personal recollections to illuminate her
life as never before. Hugo Vickers has been described by the Financial Times as
'the most knowledgeable royal biographer on the planet'. This is his most
incisive book yet, decoding hidden patterns in our most iconic monarch's
behaviour to shed new light on her as never before.





