Sunday, 22 December 2019

A CHRISTMAS CAROL / VIDEO:Official Trailer (2019) Tom Hardy, Guy Pearce Series HD





A Christmas Carol is a British fantasy miniseries based on the 1843 novella of the same name by Charles Dickens. It aired on FX in the United States on 19 December 2019 and it began airing on BBC One in the United Kingdom on the 22 and will conclude two days later on 24 December 2019. The three-part series is written by Steven Knight with actor Tom Hardy and Ridley Scott among the executive producers.

Filming locations include Rainham Hall in East London and Lord Leycester Hospital in Warwick. Cast members include Guy Pearce, Andy Serkis, Stephen Graham, Charlotte Riley, Jason Flemyng, Vinette Robinson and Joe Alwyn.

Premise
Ebenezer Scrooge, a bitter man, despises his fellow human beings, the Christmas holiday and what it represents. On Christmas Eve night, he is visited by the ghost of his dead partner Jacob Marley, who warns him that in order for both of them to be redeemed Scrooge will be visited by three spirits. Over the course of that night, Scrooge will be confronted by visions from his past, present and future in the hope that these experiences will help him to re-connect with humanity... especially his own.

In this version, Scrooge runs an investment firm, not a moneylenders.

Production
It was announced in November 2017 that the BBC had commissioned a new telling of the Dickens tale, with Steven Knight writing the three-part series. Knight, Tom Hardy and Ridley Scott would serve as executive producers.

In January 2019, it was reported that Hardy was also to be starring in the series; however, the role he would be playing was not disclosed (with Hardy being cut from the final version). In May, Guy Pearce was revealed to be playing Scrooge, alongside the castings of Andy Serkis, Stephen Graham, Charlotte Riley, Joe Alwyn, Vinette Robinson and Kayvan Novak. Rutger Hauer, who was originally cast as Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come, became too sick to film his scenes and was replaced by Jason Flemyng.




A Christmas Carol review – twee-free torment-fest is a tonic for our times
TV review
Children, go to your rooms! This is adults-only Dickens – a foul, funny and thrilling carve-up of festive flimflam that will leave you wondering if Scrooge is more seer than skinflint

Lucy Mangan
 @LucyMangan
Sun 22 Dec 2019 22.00 GMT
5 / 5 stars5 out of 5 stars.   

Christmas is for kids, really, we all know that. But this version of A Christmas Carol, my friends, is for you. Three parts, BBC One, an hour long each, adults only. Not because there’s any sex (although there is a bit of swearing), but because it’s simply … so grownup.

We open on the eve of Christmas Eve, London 1843, as all good festive adaptations should. Our first sight is of the late Jacob Marley (Stephen Graham) being roused from his not-as-eternal-as-he-thought sleep. A boy is weeing on the “skinflint old bastard’s” grave, and the drops are seeping through the coffin and splashing on Marley’s face. God rest ye, tweeness, whimsy. Your day is done.

This is a take on Dickens’ tale that looks into the darkness of the season, the unhappy hearts thrown into relief by jollity, and asks who deserves their share of joy. It incorporates a trip to purgatory for Marley, via a blacksmith who shows him the links in the chains he has forged before he binds him – each one made from the soul of a man, woman or child who died as a result of his and his business partner Ebenezer Scrooge’s actions. Marley wanders through purgatory and meets a figure stoking a bonfire. “I burn memories and old affections,” he says. “I am the Ghost of Christmas Past, here to smoke out redemption.” He tells Marley that his and Scrooge’s fates are tied – one cannot be saved without the other – because “it was with him that you profaned the soul of humanity”. Marley will be returned to the world above to pave the way. “By the time this Christmas is ash,” says the ghost, “I must search the heart of Ebenezer Scrooge and find if there is a tender place there.”

Above ground, things continue in the same unblinking mood. Bustling, urchin-crammed exteriors are replaced by deserted Georgian streets, Victoriana-stuffed interiors with high-ceilinged rooms that are clutter-free and comfortless, and poverty-stricken ciphers with real people struggling to do their best in a world full of problems not of their own making. Tweeness and whimsy have made way for psychological realism. The result is A Christmas Carol for our times, and for many times to come.

Bob Cratchit is neither a cowed underling nor a diehard optimist; he is a man who can only push back so far against his boss if he wishes to keep his sorely needed job, and justly furious about it.

And what a boss he has. Guy Pearce is Scrooge, as tall, lean, elegant and austere as the townhouse to which he retires once another day of extracting work from others, tallying grievances and wrestling with ghosts (for now metaphorical only) is done.

His anti-Christmas sentiment is not a miserabilist pose nor an annual crystallisation of a naturally grumpy disposition but an outcropping of an entire philosophy. He gazes out at the street full of smiling passersby and says, almost to himself: “It makes me sad to see all the lies … how many ‘Merry Christmasses’ are meant? Why pretend on one day of the year that the human beast is not the human beast?” It would make more sense, he suggests, to do things the other way round and have one day of acknowledging all our worst impulses. They could call it Scroogeday, says Cratchit, and his desiccated employer is drily amused. He even lets Cratchit use his ink, as Bob’s own has frozen. “Sort of Christmas present, is it?” asks Cratchit. “If it were,” Scrooge replies, channelling the Ghost of Alan Rickman’s Sheriff of Nottingham Yet to Come, “I would have wrapped it in paper and ribbons in order to artificially increase your anticipation.” The entire script is as luxuriant as the visuals are bleak.

There are hints that Scrooge nurses guilt and sorrow. He is assaulted by visions of what seem to be workers in cages, but his nephew – on a final, futile visit to invite him for Christmas lunch – tells him he comes anyway because his late mother, Ebenezer’s sister, assured him that he must forgive his uncle: “He is just in pain. A very old pain.”

Towards the end of the first episode, it is clear that there are deaths on Marley and Scrooge’s conscience, from a fire in one of their factories – the resonances with Grenfell surely deliberate – but in their other outposts, too, across the globe, all caused by their relentless attempts to keep costs down and profits up. “We vandalised the world for this,” says Marley, gesturing at Scrooge’s towering house, having found his way from purgatory. The system, says this rich, clever, funny and courageous adaptation, implicates us all. It’s not the kind we’re used to, but it’s as fine a distillation of the wider Christmas message – and the wider concerns that animated Dickens in his weightier tales – as you could hope to see.


Annus horribilis II? UK's Queen Elizabeth will reflect on another tough year




Annus horribilis II? UK's Queen Elizabeth will reflect on another tough year

Michael Holden

LONDON (Reuters) - When Britain’s Queen Elizabeth addresses her nation on Christmas Day it will mark the end of one of the most difficult years of her long reign.

Over the past 12 months, her husband got a police warning for his involvement in a car crash, her grandsons Princes William and Harry publicly fell out and her second son Prince Andrew got ever more entangled in the furor over his links to disgraced U.S. financier Jeffrey Epstein.

“This is as bad as it gets for her,” royal biographer Penny Junor told Reuters.

Back in 1992, the queen described an “annus horribilis”, wrecked by the collapse of three of her children’s marriages - including Prince Charles’ to Princess Diana - and the fire that severely damaged her Windsor Castle home.

“She obviously won’t use that phrase again,” said Junor, “but I would suspect in some ways this (year) has been even worse.”

In January, Elizabeth’s 98-year-old husband Prince Philip was involved in a car accident near the family’s Sandringham estate in eastern England. He had to give up his driving license after police gave him a warning for driving without wearing a seat belt.

Grandson Prince Harry and his American wife Meghan faced increasingly hostile stories in the press, culminating in them taking legal action against a number of tabloids. Harry also said he and elder brother Prince William had fallen out, without giving details.

The queen herself was embroiled in political wrangling over Britain’s exit from the European Union, with her suspension of parliament in September at the behest of Prime Minister Boris Johnson ruled unlawful by the country’s top court.

But by far the greatest negativity was generated by the furor over Andrew’s links to Epstein, and accusations the prince had had sex with a 17-year-old girl.

An interview Andrew gave to the BBC in November denying that accusation and any other wrongdoing was cast by the British media as a disaster, leading to him stepping down from public duties. Still, the year may not have been a total catastrophe.

SURVIVAL
“Most people will look upon 2019 as not a particularly good year for the institution but the queen came out pretty well,” said Dickie Arbiter, Elizabeth’s press secretary from 1988 to 2000.

“The monarchy has evolved over 1,000 years. It has had all sorts of circumstances running against it, but it has survived. It survived 1992, it survived the abdication of (King Edward VIII in) 1936, it survived 2019.”

Some have gone as far as saying the family could eventually emerge even stronger - and that this year’s traumas could lay the foundations of a new slimmed-down monarchy, a long-term aim of future king Prince Charles. 

The heir was key in the decision to have Andrew “de-royaled” and effectively fired from his job, said royal historian Robert Lacey.

“It’s a tragedy in a way, but it is a plus to see Charles playing a positive role in events,” added Lacey, the historical consultant to the hugely-popular Netflix TV series “The Crown”. “After 20 years, Charles is finally getting his way.”

To mark her 50th year as queen in 2002, more than a dozen members of the royal family appeared on the balcony at Buckingham Palace. A decade later it was just her, her husband, Prince Charles and wife Camilla, together with William, his wife Kate and Harry.

While Andrew dominated newspapers and broadcasts, even overshadowing the recent election, Lacey said September’s Supreme Court ruling was more significant, possibly heralding the end of the monarchy’s few remaining prerogative powers and posing questions about its future constitutional role.

“It could reduce the monarch to an essentially ceremonial and charitable role,” he said.

“The new involvement of the Supreme Court doesn’t question the existence of the monarchy - yet. But if certain decisions and prerogatives are going to be controlled or taken away, then what has the prime minister got to go to speak to the queen about each week?”

So there will be much to discuss around the Christmas table when the royals - or “the firm” as they call themselves - gather at Sandringham estate next week.

One of those whose support they can count on is the Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby, spiritual leader of the world’s 80 million Anglicans.

“I think to ask that they be superhuman saints is not what we should do because nobody is like that,” he said in an interview with The Big Issue, a magazine that helps the homeless.

“Everybody makes mistakes, everybody is human. I am not commenting on any member of the royal family except to say that I am astonished at what a gift they are to this country.”

Thursday, 19 December 2019

Inside The Archives Of Cartier



"What makes a Cartier watch different is really the
work on shape and design." This one sentence pretty much sums up the 25
pieces we got to see from Cartier's official archives, including some of the
craziest variations of the iconic Tank. This outstanding line-up also showed
how Cartier has managed to continuously re-invent itself over nearly two
centuries, with a unique ability to twist a classic and still keep the
distinctly elegant vibe that has characterized the French maison since its
founding in 1847.

The Tank by Cartier / VIDEO: The Archives Of Cartier


The Tank is a line of watches made by Cartier. It was created by Louis Cartier in 1917, and inspired by the new Renault tanks which Cartier saw in use on the Western Front. The prototype watch was presented by Cartier to General John Pershing of the American Expeditionary Force.

The Tank was introduced in 1918, and entered full production in 1919, when a total of six pieces were built. Its lines and proportions are similar to those of tanks found on First World War battlefields; it is both a square and a rectangle, and its strap is seamlessly integrated into vertical sidebars called "brancards". Since its inception, variations of the watch have been released by Cartier, including the Tank Louis in 1922, the Tank Americaine in 1989, and the Tank Francaise in 1996. The defining features of a tank watch include its bold Roman numeral dial with a chemin de fer chapter ring, sword-shaped blued steel hands, and a sapphire cabochon surmounted crown.

The Tank has become one of the most highly coveted and copied wristwatches of all time, and has been worn by Jackie Kennedy, Princess Diana, and Yves Saint Laurent, amongst many others.

Louis-François Cartier founded Cartier in Paris, France in 1847 when he took over the workshop of his master, Adolphe Picard. In 1874, Louis-François' son Alfred Cartier took over the company, but it was Alfred's sons Louis, Pierre and Jacques who established the brand name worldwide.





Pierre Cartier
Louis ran the Paris branch, moving to the Rue de la Paix in 1899. He was responsible for some of the company's most celebrated designs, like the mystery clocks (a type of clock with a transparent dial and so named because its mechanism is hidden), fashionable wristwatches and exotic orientalist Art Deco designs, including the colorful "Tutti Frutti" jewels.

In 1904, the Brazilian pioneer aviator, Alberto Santos-Dumont complained to his friend Louis Cartier of the unreliability and impracticality of using pocket watches while flying. Cartier designed a flat wristwatch with a distinctive square bezel. This watch was favored not only by Santos-Dumont himself but also by many other customers.  The "Santos" watch was Cartier's first men's wristwatch. In 1907, Cartier signed a contract with Edmond Jaeger, who agreed to exclusively supply the movements for Cartier watches. Among the Cartier team was Charles Jacqueau, who joined Louis Cartier in 1909 for the rest of his life, and Jeanne Toussaint, who was Director of Fine Jewellery from 1933.

On the other hand, Pierre Cartier established the New York City branch in 1909, moving in 1917 to 653 Fifth Avenue, the Neo-Renaissance mansion of Morton Freeman Plant (son of railroad tycoon Henry B. Plant) and designed by architect C.P.H. Gilbert. Cartier bought it from the Plants in exchange for $100 in cash and a double-stranded natural pearl necklace valued at the time at $1 million.[24] By this time, Cartier had branches in London, New York and St. Petersburg and was quickly becoming one of the most successful watch companies in the world.

Designed by Louis Cartier, the Tank watch model was introduced in 1919 with a design inspired by the newly introduced tanks on the Western Front in World War I. In the early 1920s, Cartier formed a joint-stock company with Edward Jaeger (of Jaeger-LeCoultre) to produce movements solely for Cartier. Cartier continued to use movements from other makers: Vacheron Constantin, Audemars Piguet, Movado and LeCoultre. It was also during this period that Cartier began adding its own reference numbers to the watches it sold, usually by stamping a four-digit code on the underside of a lug. Jacques took charge of the London operation and eventually moved to the current address at New Bond Street.






Tuesday, 17 December 2019

Jeanne Toussaint, 'la Panthère' de Cartier






 Cartier Celebrates Jeanne Toussaint in New Film

An exclusive look at the woman behind the house’s famous panther

by Mille Team
September 27, 2019

If there’s one name to know when it comes to Cartier history, it’s Jeanne Toussaint. The trailblazer, who is the force behind making the panther Cartier’s icon, left a permanent mark on the French jewellery house. So much so, they’re paying tribute to her in the first chapter of a new film series, entitled L’Odysée de Cartier: the Digital Series.

“A woman who revolutionized contemporary jewellery” is how Cartier describes Toussaint in the film. Afterall, what is now Cartier’s most famous symbol, was once Toussaint’s nickname, one that she earned through a reputation that she had built in Paris’s social circles for her wit and determination (and the famed full-length panther-fur coat she always wore).

Fascinated by her, Louis Cartier declared her his muse. And in 1919 he gifted her a black and gold vanity case featuring a panther. This, unbeknown to both of them at the time, would go on to be a symbol synonymous with the house.

It was only a matter of time before Cartier hired Toussaint as the head of their silver department. Within just a few years, she rose up in the ranks, becoming the brand’s Creative Director at their Rue de la Paix studio in 1933 – making her the first woman to ever hold such a position in the jewellery industry.

It was from that point on that the panther’s position within the house was solidified. Toussaint famously designed (along with designer Pierre Lemarchand) the first panther brooch: a piece that would go on to become one of the 20th century’s most iconic accessories.

By 1948, the Duke of Windsor commissioned Toussaint a Panthere brooch as a gift for the Duchess, and the rest is history. The sapphire Panthere brooch followed, and Toussaint was declared a revolutionary when it came to the art of jewellery.

Four decades since her death, Cartier continues to celebrate Toussaint’s legacy. In the next three episodes, the Maison will dive deep into its influences and foundations, with the second chapter exploring the relationship of the house and the UK, the third diving into the influence of Russian, and the fourth covering Louis Cartier’s discovery of Islamic art.





How Cartier's Jeanne Toussaint Inspired and Popularised its Iconic "Panthère"
By Sarah Jordan

The story behind Cartier's famous big cat symbol, that features in the upcoming Signed Jewels Online auction.
When tracing the history of Cartier’s iconic jewelry design style, there is one name that continually emerges as the ultimate tastemaker: Jeanne Toussaint. Born in Belgium in 1887, Toussaint survived a challenging childhood and later found herself drawn to the intoxicating streets of Paris, where art, design and societal connections were currency. As a young woman Toussaint became known as a stylish and creative ingénue. It was this charisma that attracted infamous fashion designer, Coco Chanel, illustrator George Barbier, and most crucially, Louis Cartier, one of three brothers managing his late grandfather’s company, Cartier.

In 1913, Louis Cartier commissioned Barbier to draw an advertising campaign to reflect a modern, worldly and alluring woman. The resulting image - Dame à la Panthère - reflects the shift towards Art Deco styling, with an elegant model, adorned with long sautoir necklaces and pearls with a sleek black cat at her feet. It is this drawing that is thought to be the first connection between Cartier and its iconic animal: the panther.

According to some, Louis chose the panther in tribute to Toussaint, who he called his ‘Petite Pantheré (she also famously wore a full-length coat made of panther fur). By the close of 1913, Toussaint had been hired by Cartier to be its director of bags, accessories and objects.

The working relationship between Louis Cartier and Toussaint continued, with Cartier imparting his knowledge of gemstones, diamonds, settings and technique, and Toussaint bringing her joie de vivre, relentless creativity and eye for contemporary fashions, especially the graphic and geometric Art Deco movement. In 1933, Toussaint was named director of Cartier’s luxury jewelry department, signaling one of the most recognisable and collectible eras in the house’s history.

Toussaint stepped away from Art Deco and entered the 1940s with a passion for sculptural and three-dimensional panther creations, typically set with white and yellow diamonds, emeralds and onyx. The first La Pantheré jewel – a gold and enamel panther brooch set with a cabochon emerald – was crafted for the Duchess of Windsor, Wallace Simpson, in 1948. The success of this piece set off a chain reaction, making La Pantheré rings, drop earrings and pendants hugely desirable among European and American elite.

When she wasn’t creating a menagerie of jewels, Toussaint pursued her fascination with India and revealed pieces evocative of Indian Mughal jewelry and ancient Maharajas. Artfully carved rubies, emeralds, diamonds and sapphires led to a revival of ‘Tutti Frutti’ jewellery under Toussaint’s meticulous direction in the late 1950s.

By the time she retired from Cartier in 1970, Toussaint had established her legacy as an artistic visionary; always experimenting, exploring and creating jewels for those with a worldly outlook and an eye on the future. Her professional fixation with exotic big cats, especially the panther, resulted in the animal becoming a recognisable symbol of Cartier, both then and now.

This Cartier Pantheré ring features in the upcoming Signed Jewels online auction. Find out more about Cartier, here.

Monday, 16 December 2019

Vienna: Empire, Dynasty and Dream / BBC FOUR


 Vienna was the capital of the Habsburg dynasty and home to the Holy Roman Emperors. From here, they dominated middle Europe for nearly 1,000 years. In this series, historian Simon Sebag Montefiore describes how the Habsburgs transformed Vienna into a multi-national city of music, culture and ideas. Napoleon, Hitler, Mozart, Strauss, Freud, Stalin and Klimt all played their part.

1-The Habsburgs Rise to Power
We follow the Habsburgs' rise to power and discover how Vienna marked Europe's front line in the struggle to defend both Christendom from the Ottomans and the Catholic Church from the Protestant revolutionaries that plotted to destroy it.
2-Vienna Triumphant
After the Ottoman threat receded at the end of the 17th century. The city was rebuilt. No longer an outpost defending the West from Islamic invaders, the Habsburgs vowed their empire and imperial capital would become the most glittering in the world. The Habsburg emperors transformed the city from a fortress into a great cultural capital. Vienna became a city that would define the arts; a magnet for musicians including Mozart, Haydn and Beethoven.
3-Habsburg Extinction
From his struggles with Napoleon III and Bismarck and the suicide of his son Rudolf, to the assassination of his beautiful wife Sisi, Emperor Franz Josef's empire and his family proved impossible to control. But while the Habsburgs headed for extinction, Vienna blossomed. As the theories of Freud and the sensuality of the secession artists like Klimt and Schiele ushered in the modern age, Hitler and Stalin stalked her streets. It was here that World War I was sparked; it was here World War II was dreamed.

Vienna: Empire, Dynasty and Dream
E1 of 3
The Habsburgs
Series 1 - Episode 1
The Habsburgs

by Gill Crawford
After learned peregrinations through Rome and Istanbul, panama-behatted historian Simon Sebag Montefiore turns his attention to that other great imperial city, Vienna, for what he describes as a story of “rollicking heroes and extreme bloodletting”. There’s no shortage of the latter in this first episode, as he describes the slaughter – of family rivals, opposing kings, Ottomans and Jews – that accompanied the early centuries of the Habsburg dynasty as they accumulated power and influence. But they were also good at marriage, and it wasn’t long before they controlled huge swathes of continental Europe as Holy Roman Emperors.

In case the parade of names threatens to dull the attention, Montefiore relishes the more gruesome aspects of the time, notably the savagery of the Thirty Years War, all the while wandering through elegant streets and ornate palaces. It sums up the schizophrenic nature of the period neatly.

SUMMARY
Historian Simon Sebag Montefiore describes how the Habsburgs transformed Vienna into a multi-national city of music, culture, art and ideas. Simon explores the Habsburgs' rise to power and discovers more about how Vienna marked Europe's front line in the struggle to defend both Christendom and the Catholic Church from revolutionaries who plotted to destroy them.
CAST & CREW
Presenter Simon Sebag Montefiore
Director Dominic Ozanne
Executive Producer Mike Smith
Producer Dominic Ozanne
Series Producer Richard Downes


Telegraph  Culture  TV
Vienna: Empire, Dynasty and Dream: a mischievous look at the horror of the Habsburgs: review
   
Simon Sebag Montefiore in Vienna
Ben Lawrence
8 DECEMBER 2016 • 10:00PM

Vienna: Empire, Dynasty and Dream (BBC Four) is one of those bombastic titles which fretful TV executives thrust upon programmes they fear may be too brainy for mere mortals. Simon Sebag Montefiore’s documentary (the first of three) did not start promisingly – he gurned his way through a concision of the programme’s themes (essentially how the Austrian capital has consistently been the locus of power politics, religion and culture) and drummed up some pointless alliteration that would make Kelvin MacKenzie squirm (“from Peru to Poland, from Netherlands to Naples” – which, if you think about it, makes no sense when trying to convey the scale of the Habsburg Empire).

However, Sebag Montefiore has a mischievous eye for blood and gore. Flagellation, decapitation and that schoolboy favourite, defenestration, featured heavily. Albert I of Germany, who had a gaping hole where an eye should have been, was murdered by an enraged nephew and his children sought revenge, beheading 63 of his relatives. “As blood spurted out of them,” said Sebag Montefiore with more than a little theatrical flourish, “Albert’s daughter cried out in ecstasy: ‘This is like being bathed in May dew.’”

Yet even Sebag Montefiore’s vivid descriptions couldn’t disguise the meagre budget or the lack of imagery to accompany his storytelling. Lucy Worsley would have dressed up in a hooped skirt and pantables to fill in the gaps. Here, there were a lot of shots of the lofty Sebag Montefiore walking through cobbled streets and over ancient bridges, swooping on historical nuggets like a sort of erudite stork.

Indeed, he is a smart interpreter of historical fact and was able to convey the whims and wheeler-dealings of a deeply divided Habsburg dynasty and set it within a context of general pan-European uncertainty, constantly under threat from the Ottoman Empire which lurked in the shadows.

 “What do you make of a Holy Roman Emperor who wants to see himself as a fruit salad?” pondered Sebag Montefiore as he examined a hideous portrait of Rudolf II done up as Vertumnus, the Roman god of the seasons. Some answers will forever be consigned to history.

Saturday, 14 December 2019

Fin de siécle Vienna /Vienna Blood / Vienna Blood: Trailer | BBC Trailers

Vienna Blood is a 2019 British-Austrian television series set in 1900s Vienna, based on the Liebermann books by Frank Tallis.
It stars Matthew Beard as Max Liebermann, a doctor and student of Sigmund Freud, who helps Detective Oskar Rheinhardt (Jürgen Maurer). He assists the detective in the investigation of a series of disturbing murders.
The Liebermann family's position as Jews facing growing anti-Semitism is a continuing sub-theme.





Vienna Blood review – so much like Sherlock it seems like a spoof
3 / 5 stars3 out of 5 stars.   

This fin de siècle murder mystery about a maverick detective and his doctor sidekick is laughably Holmesian – but enjoyably absurd

Emine Saner
 @eminesaner
Mon 18 Nov 2019 22.30 GMT

For someone who professes to be into the new-fangled science of what makes people tick, I’m not sure it was the cleverest move to get into a rickety carriage on a fairground ferris wheel with a psychopathic killer. Still, the image of junior doctor Max Liebermann hanging from his fingertips over the city of Vienna after being hurled from the door, proved a thrilling, if completely avoidable – “hypnosis would be easier” – end to the first episode of Vienna Blood (BBC Two).

It is set in Vienna in 1906, where gruff detective Oskar Rheinhardt (Juergen Maurer) is told that a young doctor – Liebermann (Matthew Beard), a fan of Freud – will be shadowing him to learn about “the psychopathy of the criminal mind”. “Catchy,” deadpans Rheinhardt. The three-part series will be compared, unavoidably, to Sherlock: its writer, Steve Thompson, adapting the Frank Tallis novels, was also a Sherlock scriptwriter. But Liebermann’s character study of his reluctant new mentor is so Holmesian it feels like a spoof. For the first half an hour, it feels as if the makers are failing to repress their Sherlock complex – the jaunty camera angles, the hyperreal look, the jangly music – until it starts to relax into itself.

A medium has been murdered – a crime that has been made to look like suicide. Except, points out just about every character – as if we didn’t get the significance the first time – where is the weapon? Rheinhardt is, in the classic tradition, one of those troubled but maverick detectives with quirks – he munches coffee beans – and who needs a quick conviction. His relationship with Liebermann is predictably tricky at first, but it is nice to watch him thaw. “You’re staring,” says Rheinhardt. “I was told I could observe,” says the young doctor. The police officer is humble enough to value Liebermann’s talents for personality profiling, and asks for help. And hurrah, (possibly) TV’s first forensic psychologist is born.

Liebermann is implausibly good at this: he points out that the woman’s apartment is “like a stage set” (they realise she holds seances), and is puzzled by the absence of clothes in her wardrobe, until he makes the giant leap that she must have been pregnant, her clothes all taken to be altered by a seamstress. “Welcome to the case, Inspector,” says the doctor. Goodness, he’s cocky, under that cool demeanour. Back to the morgue where his theory is confirmed. “Find the father of this child, he’s your killer,” he tells the experienced older detective, who inexplicably fails to thank him sarcastically for the suggestion.

Is the killer Otto Braun, one of the men they track down who attended the seance? There is a good rooftop chase that makes him look guilty. “Welcome to the case, doctor,” says Rheinhardt back to Liebermann, when they catch him. It is cheesy, but their relationship is developing so nicely I’ll let them off. But it’s not Braun – the killer is an adulterer with a reputation to lose, and anyway, Braun soon ends up dead.

The sleuths arrange another seance, presumably – though it’s not clear – to pretend to contact the dead medium, and flush out one of the other attendees, a wealthy banker, Heinrich Holderlein, whose wife makes him go to this sort of thing. It doesn’t work but he is questioned, until rich and powerful people conspire to put pressure on the police, and get Rheinhardt taken off the case.

As if that would work; Rheinhardt is dogged and anyway, he says, “work is all I have”. He deduces the murder weapon is an antique gun, stuffed with fragments of human bone instead of shot, so it leaves no trace (I still don’t understand why the killer thought this necessary) – and Liebermann figures the door was locked from the outside using steel forceps. Which makes them suspicious of the Vienna steel magnate and mayor’s right-hand man, Hans Brückmüller – as if he’s the only one in the city with access to such a device. But it must be him – the police commissioner was keeping the mayor’s office informed of the investigation, so Brückmüller was always a step ahead.

Invited anonymously by Liebermann to meet him at the fairground and ride the big wheel, Brückmüller is revealed not so much as a Moriarty mastermind but as a frighteningly recognisable trumped-up politician wanting to rid Vienna of “the vermin – the subversives, the intellectuals, the muck-raking journalists”. He spits contemptuously at Liebermann: “Dr Jew.” Still, Liebermann gets his confession, and stuffs a life-saving finger in Brückmüller’s fresh bullet wound.

It is all absurd but enjoyable, the extended length more or less justified by the subplots: the advent of a more humane treatment of mental health v the electroshocks championed by Liebermann’s arrogant professor; Viennese overt antisemitism and Liebermann’s father’s desperation to fit in; the difficulty of convicting powerful men who think they are untouchable. I take issue with the women depicted almost exclusively as beautiful corpses, vehicles for gratuitous breast shots, hysterics or needy girlfriends. And the odd-couple detective and sidekick setup feels tired. But Beard and Maurer are excellent, and my id is a sucker for a bit of murder in a fin de siècle setting, so I’ll forgive much.



Fin-de-siècle Vienna: Politics and Culture is a 1979 transdisciplinary non-fiction book written by cultural historian Carl E. Schorske and published by Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. Described by its publisher as a "magnificent revelation of turn-of-the-century Vienna where out of a crisis of political and social disintegration so much of modern art and thought was born," the book won the 1981 Pulitzer Prize for General Non-Fiction. The book is lavishly illustrated with both color and black-and-white reproductions of key artworks, helpfully referenced from the text which explains their relevance to the themes in question.

Partly reconstructed from Schorske's articles published in the American Historical Review, the book is structured into seven thematically interlocking chapters. Each chapter considers the interrelationships between key artists with the development of psychoanalysis and what was — at the time — viewed as an end of history.

In the 'Introduction' the author claims that the text was born from his desire 'to construct a course in European intellectual history, designed to help students to understand the large, architectonic correlations between high culture and socio-political change' (p. XVIII). In his view, Vienna was a peculiar cultural environment due to the late ascendancy and early crisis of its liberal middle class between the 1860s and the 1890s. This compression of the socio-political liberal hegemony provided the opportunity for a 'collective Oedipal revolt' against the liberal inheritance, promoted by "Die Jungen" (the Young Ones), spreading from politics in the 1870s to literature and art in the 1890s. The chronologically compressed and socially circumscribed character of the Viennese experience created a more coherent context for studying the different ramifications of its high culture (p. XXVI).

The second essay, "The Ringstrasse, its critics, and the birth of urban modernism" looks back to explore the liberal cultural system in its ascendancy through the medium of urban form and architectural style ... but it looks forward too … to the critical responses on the part of two leading participants in it — Otto Wagner and Camillo Sitte — reveal the emergence of conflicting tendencies, communitarian and functionalist, in modern thought about the built environment (p. XXVIII).