Wednesday, 18 October 2023

Sammie and us ...


 

Sammie has been living with us for two weeks. Sammie was born two months ago. It is therefore a baby. It needs a lot of attention to build up his daily rituals and to help make his transition to a new life away from his brothers and sisters and his mother.

He needs to learn a lot. But we also need to learn a lot about Sammie.

It is, therefore, a mutual process that requires a lot of attention, permanent availability and love directed to the construction of such mutual rituals.

I will give you news sporadically.

Greetings from Sergio, Trudie and Sammie.

PS. Although Sammie seems to have a lot of a "Border Terrier", he is a Hollandse Smous Hond".

These photographs were taken still in our summer dacha / garden.

We will be moving very soon to our main home.


DUTCH SMOUSHOND

https://smoushond.nl/

The Dutch Smoushond is one of the nine Dutch breeds. In the nineteenth century it was often used as a companion of horse and carriage and as a mouse and pied piper in the stable. At some point, interest in the breed disappeared and just after the Second World War, the Dutch Smous dog was completely extinct. In 1973, Mrs. Riek Barkman took the initiative to breed the breed back. With success: there are now about 1,500 Dutch Smoushonden in the Netherlands. Today, the Smous is above all a highly valued and beloved family dog.

 

Did you know that not all dogs you encounter on the street have an official pedigree? Purebred dogs without pedigree are called 'look-alikes'. To know more about the difference between a pedigree dog and a 'look-alike', see the page 'Why a pedigree dog?'.

 

 race

The Dutch Smoushond is a fairly small, square-built, shaggy dog with a height between 35 and 42 cm. It is lively, agile, compact and sturdy. The color of his coat is yellow, ranging from light to dark straw yellow.

 

Anyone who purchases a Smous puppy assumes the obligation to breed a litter with it later, if the dog is found suitable for this, or, if it concerns a male, to make this male available for mating. The Hollandse Smoushonden Club does not have breeders as is the case with other breeds: all owners of suitable Smousjes are in principle breeders. The average age of a Smous is about thirteen to fourteen years with peaks up to seventeen or eighteen years.

 

character

The character of the Smous is cheerful and friendly. He is usually soft-tempered, lively, playful and very affectionate. He loves children and also usually gets along well with cats and peers. The Dutch Smous dog is an intelligent dog who will like to do something for his owner. The education of the Smous is therefore not that difficult. However, just like with any other dog, you have to be consistent in your upbringing.

 

The Dutch Smoushond is tireless and loves to take long walks and swim. He also loves dog sports such as dog dance, agility, flyball and the like.

 

 care

The ideal coat of the Dutch Smoushond is rough, coarse and steep. Depending on the quality of the coat, you should pick it by hand twice a year. Combing and brushing are not necessary, but check regularly that no tangles have formed at the armpits or under the tail. If too much hair grows between the soles of the feet, you can cut it away. Furthermore, it is smart to get a puppy used to brushing teeth from an early age with a special brush and paste for dogs. This prevents trouble in his later life.

 

 health

The Hollandse Smoushonden Club has set up an association breeding regulation. They do not require health examinations in the VFR.

 

For the association breeding regulations and more information, please contact the breed club.

 

 FCI information

FCI group 2: Pinschers, Schnauzers, Molossers and Mountain Dogs



Monday, 16 October 2023

Allan Greenberg. New Classical Architect.



Allan Greenberg (born September 1938), is an American architect and one of the leading classical architects of the twenty-first century. He was the originator and leading practitioner of "canonical classicism," one of many design responses to postmodernism emerging in the mid-1970s. According to Paul Goldberger, architecture critic for The New York Times, Greenberg's “life’s work has been a mission to establish the validity of classicism as an architectural language in our time.” In addition to his architecture, Greenberg’s articles, teaching, and lectures have exerted a strong influence on the study and practice of contemporary classicism. In 2006, he was the first American to be awarded the Richard H. Driehaus Prize for Classical Architecture in recognition of his major contributions to architectural design and scholarship. The prize is awarded annually "to a living architect whose work embodies the principles of traditional and classical architecture and urbanism in contemporary society and creates a positive, long-lasting cultural, environmental, and artistic impact." George Hersey, author and professor of Art History at Yale University, wrote:
Greenberg is the most knowing, most serious practitioner of Classicism currently on the scene in this country. . . . Greenberg belongs in the succession of Charles Follen McKim, Daniel Burnham, Henry Bacon, John Russell Pope, and Arthur Brown. And above all he belongs to the succession of Greece and Rome, of Vignola and Sanmicheli, of Vanvitelli, Ledoux, and Labrouste, to the visionary company of those who play the great game of Classicism.
Born in Johannesburg, South Africa, Greenberg was educated at the University of Witwatersrand, where he studied classical and Gothic architecture. He attributes his thorough grounding in architectural history to the rigors of his study there. Professors required students to memorize and draw the plans of famous buildings at will. Following a short working career in South Africa, Greenberg moved to London with the intention of studying there, and briefly considered taking a job with Le Corbusier. After a short stay in England he left for Denmark to work in the studio of the leading Scandinavian modernist architect Jørn Utzon during the design of the Sydney Opera House. He subsequently took a job in Helsinki with Viljo Revell, perhaps the best known Finnish architect after Alvar Aalto, whom Greenberg admired greatly.
In 1963 the architect moved his Danish wife and young family to America. He was admitted to the demanding architecture program at Yale, headed by the young genius Paul Marvin Rudolph. Like fellow foreign students Norman Foster and Richard Rogers, Greenberg sought a fresh approach to Modernism in a country that was advancing faster than Europe in technology and architectural theory. After receiving his Master of Architecture degree from Yale University in 1965, he spent two years in the City of New Haven’s Redevelopment Agency and later served as Architectural Consultant to Connecticut’s Chief Justice from 1967 to 1979. He taught at Yale under deans Charles W. Moore and Herman Spiegel, watching the student upheavals of the late 1960s, and helped to develop the school's undergraduate major in architecture. It was during the early 1970s that Greenberg became disillusioned with orthodox Modernism, turning instead to postmodernist critiques offered by Yale colleagues Robert Venturi and Denise Scott Brown.

Greenberg's work in the mid-1970s was influenced both by the American "grays" (Moore, Venturi, Robert A.M. Stern, et al.) with whom he became associated, and by modern classicists such as Edwin Lutyens and Mott B. Schmidt. But as he came to better understand the achievements of these 20th-century masters, he increasingly pushed his work toward a more traditional vocabulary. His breakthrough projects came in the early 1980s with his design of a large country house for Peter and Sandra Brandt in Greenwich, Connecticut (a commission wrested from Venturi), and George Schultz's extensive classical suite at the State Department in Washington, D.C. After their publication Greenberg's office flourished, and many students interested in traditional design came to New Haven to work with him. No architect in America has had a more profound influence on the younger generation of traditional architects who are practicing today.














Simons Medal to Be Awarded to Allan Greenberg
By MCCAULEYN | Published: MARCH 21, 2013 / http://blogs.cofc.edu/sota/page/3/


The Historic Preservation and Community Planning program in the Department of Art history presents the Albert Simons Medal of Excellence to classical architect Allan Greenberg, author of George Washington, Architect.
 The Simons Medal of Excellence was established in honor of the twentieth anniversary of the College of Charleston School of the Arts. Albert Simons pioneered the teaching of art at the College, and the medal honors individuals who have excelled in one or more of the areas in which albert simons excelled, including civic design, architectural design, historic preservation and urban planning. Please join us in honoring Greenberg on Thursday, March 21, 2013, when he will also give a lecture on his work.
Born in Johannesburg, South Africa, Allan Greenberg was educated at the University of Witwatersrand, where he trained in classical, Gothic, and modern architecture. He worked for leading Scandinavian modernist architect Jørn Utzon, with whom he worked on the Sydney Opera House. After receiving his Master of Architecture degree from Yale University in 1965, he spent two years in the City of New Haven’s Redevelopment Agency and later served as Architectural Consultant to Connecticut’s Chief Justice from 1967 to 1979. He received his U.S. citizenship in 1973.

In 1972 Greenberg established his firm which currently has offices in New York City, Greenwich, Connecticut, and Alexandria, Virginia. The firm has an international reputation for combining contemporaryconstruction techniques with the best architectural traditions to create solutions that are both timeless and technologically progressive.  Projects include master plans, feasibility studies, new construction, renovations, restorations, and interior and furniture design for academic, institutional, religious, commercial, residential, and retail clients. Completed projects are found throughout the United States, as well as in Europe and the Middle East.

Greenberg’s articles, teaching, and lectures have exerted a strong influence on the study and practice of classical architecture. He has taught at Yale University’s School of Architecture and School of Law, the University of Pennsylvania, the Division of Historic Preservation at Columbia University, and the University of Notre Dame. He has written books and articles, both scholarly and popular, on the dynamic and enduring qualities of traditional architecture and design. A monograph of his work was published in 1995, followed by George Washington, Architect, in 1999. His recent books include The Architecture of Democracy: American Architecture and the Legacy of the Revolution, published by Rizzoli in July 2006, and Lutyens and the Modern Movement, released by Papadakis Publisher in 2007. In the October 2013, Rizzoli will publish a monograph of his recent work.

In 2006, Greenberg was the first American to be awarded the Richard H. Driehaus Prize for Classical Architecture, in recognition for built work and scholarship that has enriched the American architectural and cultural landscape


Mid-18th-Century Modern: The Classicists Strike Back
By DAVID COLMAN



 THE early 1990's did not seem the moment for a revival in classical architecture. On the contrary, from Manhattan to Berlin, museums, hotels, developers and wealthy individuals were clamoring to sign up Richard Meier, Jean Nouvel and other celebrity modernists, hoping that the style and substance of radical design would lure visitors and buyers in droves.

In many cases that strategy worked. Frank Gehry's Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao, Spain, has attracted more than seven million visitors since 1997, and Ian Schrager's boutique hotels changed the industry. So one could understand why the design world might dismiss the earnest and tweedy souls in horn-rimmed glasses who founded the Institute of Classical Architecture in 1992. Who needs Ionic columns when you can have Rem Koolhaas?

What a difference a decade makes. Since 2002 the institute has made sweeping changes to its once-fusty agenda, and the design world is scoffing no longer. The group appointed its first full-time president, Paul Gunther, two years ago; merged with Classical America, another traditional scholarship organization; and has fanned the appetite for traditional architecture. In the last 18 months, its membership has more than doubled, to 1,500, and the group (now called the Institute of Classical Architecture & Classical America) has opened five new regional chapters for a total of seven.

Its program of classes, tours and lectures teaching the concepts and practices of traditional architecture - a curriculum largely vanished from architecture schools - earned last year's largest design grant from the National Endowment for the Arts. Its lectures in New York have drawn speakers like Martha Stewart and crowds as large as 300, even on staid topics like a new translation of Vitruvius.

"Their contribution to the awareness of architecture and design has become enormous in the last few years," said Chase Rynd, the executive director of the National Building Museum in Washington. Even decorators who like their modernism, like Miles Redd and DD Allen, are showing up for the institute's lectures and classes on subjects like ornamental pilastering and theories of proportion. It has started regional programs aimed at developers and builders. While the institute was sustained for more than a decade by pure classicists like Gil Schafer III, Anne Fairfax and Richard Sammons, their preaching did not find a great audience. Now the institute, which last year finally found a permanent home in a neo-Classical style 1890 building on West 44th Street, has opened up the discourse to include traditional architectural styles, including Georgian and Greek Revival, Arts and Crafts, Gothic Revival and shingle style.

"They're really expanding the definition of what constitutes classicism," said Bunny Williams, the Manhattan decorator and a fellow on the institute's board. Last year the institute gave its Ross Award for excellence in architecture to Merrill & Pastor, a Florida firm, whose work ranges from classical to early modern.

"The purists on the board are not ascendant," Mr. Gunther said. While he deflects praise to the institute itself, he is responsible for much of its recent success, members say. Mr. Gunther, a socially well-connected former vice president of the New-York Historical Society, has become a kind of Karl Rove for the classicist movement. "He's a huge factor in their success," Ms. Williams said.

Ever on the lookout for ways to expand the institute's scope and prestige, Mr. Gunther last month announced that in partnership with Habitat for Humanity it would design classically styled affordable homes for use in historic neighborhoods across the country. Prototypes will be built in Savannah, Ga.; Norfolk, Va.; and Rochester.

"It was a well-thought-out and practical collaboration," said Jeff Speck, the director of design at the National Endowment for the Arts, which contributed $50,000. "Nothing is more attractive to an N.E.A. panel than seeing artistic means used toward social ends."

Mr. Gunther, for his part, accounts for the institute's popularity as a reassuring counterpoint to today's technological upheaval, and not an anachronistic clash. "All those high-tech guys on the West Coast, they're on the cutting edge of inventing the future," Mr. Gunther said. "But when it comes to home and hearth, they're building traditional houses. There's a marketplace of demand for this out there. So do you just ignore it or try and do something about it and make it better?"

Classicism's most zealous fans maintain that its tenets mark it as the great and timeless architecture of democracy, and they exalt it above all other styles. But even nonzealots have come to see its allure. "I'll have people who have lived in really fabulous modern apartments," Mr. Redd said. "But then they'll move into an apartment or house that has a lot of classical proportions and details, and they'll say, 'Now, I really feel like a grown-up.' "

Jane Rosenthal, Robert De Niro's partner in the TriBeCa Film Center, certainly had enough of contemporary loft living. Last year she and her family left their loft (and its Eames-chair décor) for the Dakota on Central Park West, hiring Peter Pennoyer, one of New York's premier classical architects, for the redo.

"I love the new, but I don't ever like to forget what came before," Ms. Rosenthal said. "There's such a sense of history here, and that inspires you to go forward and push boundaries when you can understand that historical context. So you're not trying to be new just for the sake of being new."

But detractors counter that today's traditionalism is more about class than classicism. Instead of recalling the noble aims of the golden age of Mount Vernon and Monticello, classicism today, they say, seems more likely to recall the glory days of Anglo-American aristocracy, a Ralph Lauren version of architecture. One need only look at the limestone-columned, 28,000-square-foot behemoth built in Atlanta by the architect William H. Harrison to get the point.

It doesn't help that many of the institute's members have a knack for speaking in lofty, unbroken expanses of prose studded with arcane details, and its lectures may be the only Manhattan soirées with more bow ties than Botox.

Yet, traditional styles of house building are on the rise, according to the American Institute of Building Design, an association that represents architects and developers, and there are also new markets for metal- and stoneworking methods and materials once nearly defunct.

In upscale subdivisions across the country, for example, the Palladian window has become a prominent architectural feature, letting plenty of light into double-height living rooms, while still summoning up echoes, however murky, of early-19th-century gentility. But paired with an eyebrow window, an off-kilter gable or two and a rambling ranch floor plan, the traditional look becomes something very different: what might be called neo-hodgepodge.

"We were putting the columns in all goofy," said W. A. Lawrence, the owner of Period Style Homes, a large home-design firm based in Fort Myers, Fla., who has attended courses at the institute in New York and has helped arrange for it to give similar classes in Florida for the state builders association. "We had them drawn wrong, spaced wrong. Once you get it right, it's amazing how much better it looks. It's almost mind-blowing."

After the success in Florida, the institute formulated a separate program of classes for home builders, which began last year with a five weekend course in five cities across the South. The Endowment for the Arts helped pay for the program with a $30,000 grant.

The institute's successes do not rub everyone in design the right way. Some of the debate has, not surprisingly, taken on political overtones. One institute staff member said that shortly after he started working for it, he received a furious note from a friend accusing him of having become a neoconservative stooge. He asked not to be identified so as not to reopen a wound.

The dialogue does not often get that heated, but tensions do simmer. David Dowler, an amiable portfolio manager, hired the Florida-based Merrill & Pastor Architects to build a house for him and his wife, Marsha, in Highland Park, Tex., a 1920's-era subdivision just outside Dallas. The house, finished in 2002, was far from classical, a clean, angular white stucco structure reminiscent of the Arts and Crafts style. But to members of the Dallas Architectural Forum, a loose-knit group of architects and architecture fans, which convenes for functions and lectures, Mr. Dowler said, "I may be a dissident."

Mr. Dowler, who also owns a house in the new urbanist community of Seaside, Fla., added, "It's always modernists who come lecture, and I would like to see more exposure to other styles."

He is not, he said, a fan of many modern houses. "They are much better photographed than lived in," he said. "I get mad at architects who overemphasize how something looks rather than how something works as a home."

But others are quick to point out that nostalgia for 18th-century buildings may have more to do with unspoken nostalgia for the 18th century than for the building. "Reviving the classical forms is not the same thing as reviving the culture," said Terence Riley, the chief curator of architecture and design at the Museum of Modern Art in New York. A 2000 Georgian mansion might be impossible to differentiate from an 1800 one, but the social climates that created the two are two centuries apart.

The institute's brain trust, for its part, argues that traditionalist styles are inherently better models for builders because they do not require a talented, cerebral interpreter, just a good copying machine. "It may be easier for amateurs," Mr. Riley responded. "That said, I don't necessarily buy that argument. Turning a green field into suburban parcels with perfect classical houses, I would argue, doesn't give us anything remotely recognizable within the language of classical architecture."


"The contemporary city is messy," he added, summing up a century of modernist architectural theory. "I don't know if classicism makes a lot of sense, but everyone should study it"

Sunday, 15 October 2023

Raymond Erith New-Classical Architect.


Raymond Erith with Quinlan Terry


Raymond Erith New-Classical Architect
Raymond Charles Erith RA FRIBA (7 August 1904 - 30 November 1973) was a leading classical architect in England during the period dominated by the modern movement after the Second World War. His work demonstrates his continual interest in expanding the classical tradition to establish a progressive modern architecture, drawing on the inherited experience and wisdom of the past.
At a time when traditionalists were routinely dismissed as Neo-Georgian, Erith’s skill and originality set him apart, as did his complex and creative use of his sources of inspiration and his quirky sense of humour. The sheer pleasure he found in architecture is evident in his buildings.
Erith was appointed architect for the reconstruction of Downing Street (1958), elected a Royal Academician (1959) and served on the Royal Fine Art Commission (1960–73). Since his death, exhibitions of his work have been held by the Royal Academy of Arts (1976),Gainsborough’s House, Sudbury (1979), Niall Hobhouse (1986) and Sir John Soane’s Museum (2004).

Raymond Erith was born in London, eldest son of Charles Erith, a mechanical engineer and his wife May. At the age of four he contracted tuberculosis, which led to twelve years of intermittent illness and left him permanently lame. He trained at the Architectural Association (1921–26) and worked for Morley Horder and Verner Rees before setting up his own practice in London in 1928. From 1929-39 he was in partnership with Bertram Hume, with whom he won an international competition for replanning the Lower Norrmalm area of Stockholm (1934).
In 1934 he married Pamela, younger daughter of Arthur and Elsie Spencer Jackson, who had also qualified at the AA. They had four daughters. In 1936 they moved to Dedham, Essex. Among Erith’s early commissions were Great House, Dedham (1937) and gates, lodges and cottages in Windsor Great Park for King George VI (1939). As a young man he looked back to the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries in order to pick up the thread of tradition while it was still unbroken and carry it forward from there. This led him to John Soane, an important influence on his early designs but later he turned to earlier sources of inspiration and especially to Palladio and the robust practicality of his farmhouse villas.
During the Second World War from 1940-45 Erith became a farmer in Essex, where he lived for the rest of his life. This experience and his country practice in East Anglia immediately after the war gave him a profound understanding of the local vernacular architecture, which was to have a subtle influence on his mature style.

In 1946 Erith opened an office in Ipswich, moving it to Dedham in 1958. His architecture ranges from cottages and small houses to public buildings such as the Library[8] and quadrangle at Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford (1959-1963), Jack Straw’s Castle on Hampstead Heath (1963) and the New Common Room Building at Gray’s Inn (1971). Major work includes 15,17 and 19, Aubrey Walk, London W8 (1951), the Pediment, Aynho, Northamptonshire and its garden buildings (1956–73), the Provost’s Lodgings at the Queen’s College, Oxford (1958) and the Folly in Herefordshire (1961).
His larger country houses are Bentley, Sussex (1960–71), Wivenhoe New Park, Essex (1962) and King’s Walden Bury, Hertfordshire (1969). The best known of his many restorations was the reconstruction of Nos 10 and 11 and complete rebuilding of No. 12, Downing Street (1959–63). He also remodelled numerous houses including Morley Hall, Wareside, Hertfordshire (1955), Wellingham House, Ringmer, Sussex (1955–71), Hunton Manor, Hampshire (1962) and Shelley’s Folly, Cooksbridge, Sussex (1968). After Erith’s death in 1973, his partner Quinlan Terry carried on his practice (now Quinlan and Francis Terry Architects).
That Erith was an outstanding draughtsman is seen in his sketchbooks, working drawings and designs for the many competitions he entered in his early years. His fine drawings were regularly exhibited at the Royal Academy Summer Exhibitions. These showed many of his most important commissions, as well as unexecuted schemes such as a Factory, Warehouse, Offices etc. at Ipswich (1948), a House in Devonshire to be called the Redoubt for Mr Freeman (1949) and Variation on a theme by Palladio: Design for a Church in Italy (1952).
From 1962 onwards Erith’s designs were regularly exhibited at the RA in the form of linocuts by Quinlan Terry, who became his pupil in 1962 and subsequently his partner.


For a detailed information on Erith’s life and work, including full bibliography, see:
Lucy Archer, Raymond Erith Architect (1985)

Margaret Richardson, Lucy Archer, Kenneth Powell, Quinlan Terry and George Saumarez Smith, Raymond Erith (1904-1973): Progressive Classicist, Sir John Soane’s Museum 2004



A neglected architect who shunned concrete

THE outcry at the closure of landmark pub Jack Straw’s Castle on the edge of Hampstead Heath last summer wasn’t the biggest hullabaloo caused by the only post-war listed pub in England.
According to Lucy Archer, daughter of the late architect Raymond Erith, who designed the pub in North End Way, Hampstead: “There was huge opposition when it was built in 1963. People wanted it to be more modern.”
But, typical of Erith, he preferred to show how a modern, open-plan building could be made attractive and functional using a traditional timber frame.
He said: “Wood suits pubs. With a concrete frame, the beams have to be cased. My posts and beams are the real thing. You can see them and touch them and the landlord can knock nails into them.”
The result was a building lauded by Highgate-born poet laureate Sir John Betjeman at Erith’s memorial service following his death in 1974 as “true Middlesex” and “a delight”.
According to Mrs Archer, Erith’s adherence to tradition in an age of modernist architecture “inevitably limited his commissions, especially for public buildings, which is why Jack Straw’s Castle is so important”.
The former pub, while retaining its outside appearance, is being turned private inside, with flats and a gym. However, many more Erith buildings can now be appreciated in a new exhibition of his work, Raymond Erith, Progressive Classicist, at Sir John Soane’s Museum in Lincoln’s Inn Fields, Holborn.
The show marks the centenary of the architect’s birth in 1904 and has been curated by Mrs Archer, not only his daughter, but also an architectural historian.
The show includes Erith’s extensive yet seamless remodelling of 10 Downing Street, where one contemporary wag wrote Harold Macmillan “was chased out by termites” in 1959.
Also on show are pictures of more local Erith buildings, including the new Common Room and Buttery at Gray’s Inn, South Square, Holborn (1971) and the 1968 London Underground ventilation tower in Gibson Square, Islington.
Mrs Archer says the exhibition couldn’t be in a better place – The former house of Sir John Soane, the neo-classical architect active around 1800. “My father trained in the age of the young modernist architects,” she says, “but he didn’t want to throw out tradition. He was genuinely inspired to learn from Soane, to move classical architecture on, as he felt Soane had done.
“So he must have spent a lot of time at Sir John Soane’s Museum when he was young, and I can remember coming to meet him here when I was about 18.”
The resulting Erith designs, Mrs Archer says, were never pastiche, but “modern and geometric. They couldn’t be anything but 20th-century buildings. But he would also always look at the surrounding neighbourhood and wanted them to fit in and appear as if they had always been there.”
So Jack Straw’s Castle, which replaced an earlier, bombed-out pub on the site, was unusual in being “a completely free-standing one-off, and the only time when Erith achieved the shock factor”, Mrs Archer says.
The Hampstead Heath pub was typical in showing the famous Erith sense of humour.
Jack Straw was the deputy leader of the 1381 Peasants' Revolt, who is said to have lived on the site and bequeathed his name to the earlier pub. The architect of its replacement therefore gave Jack Straw’s Castle wooden battlements and two towers and one housed the building’s water tanks and the other the lift gear.
London born but Surrey bred, Raymond Erith had a highly unusual childhood.
Mrs Archer explains: “He contracted tuberculosis at the age of four and was largely bedridden until 16, when he recovered. But this gave him a lot of time to think, and he developed a great intellectual independence.
“He spent a particularly lonely time between the ages of five and eight at a nursing home in Margate, Kent, where, to pass the time, he started drawing. One picture of a lighthouse was precociously drawn on fancy grey paper which he had specially requested to be brought from home.
“He never talked about his illness afterwards, because he absolutely didn’t want to be seen as an invalid. And he was always a very happy person from a very affectionate family, who made his sick room the centre of the home.
“Nevertheless, he only managed to complete four terms at school. But he still got accepted to train at the Architectural Association in Bedford Square, Bloomsbury, at the age of 17, in 1921.”
Now 65, Mrs Archer, lives in an Erith house originally built for her grandparents in Essex, the area he later moved to himself.
“It was very exciting to watch him at home, drawing,” she recalls. “He had tremendous concentration. If one of us four girls would come marching down the corridor, he used to shout out ‘Don’t shake!’ And sometimes he would draw through the night. Then, over breakfast, he’d make a deliberately provocative remark, to get us all thinking and discussing.”
The exhibition features some of Erith’s sketchbooks, filled not only with exquisite watercolours, but obsessive drawings of nuts and bolt, reflecting the intensely practical interest he inherited from his father, a mechanical engineer.
Raymond Erith died suddenly, aged 69. Mrs Archer recalls: “He had a cough which was diagnosed as lung cancer, he got through a dangerous operation, then died two days later from a heart attack. He had been so active so it was a tremendous shock.”





Past Exhibitions
Raymond Erith (1904-1973): Progressive Classicist
An Exhibition in the Soane Gallery from 8 October to 31 December 2004
Sponsored by Lisbet Rausing and Peter Baldwin / Sir John Soane Museum http://www.soane.org/exhibitions/raymond_erith_1904_1973_progressive_classicist

Sir John Soane's Museum is pleased to announce a new exhibition examining the work of Raymond Erith, one of the most accomplished and original English architects of the last century. Raymond Erith: Progressive Classicist will take a fresh look at Erith's extraordinary body of work, bringing together the best of his drawings with a series of stunning new photographs.

Raymond Erith occupies an unusual position in the history of British architecture. Like his great hero, John Soane, he did not always follow the prevailing stylistic currents of his age. He also shared Soane's belief in 'progressive classicism', deciding not to reject tradition but draw creatively on its accumulated wisdom. Although in sharp contrast to the work of many of his contemporaries, Erith's architecture, with its subtle use of natural materials, meticulous (sometimes playful) detailing and skilled craftsmanship earned him wide respect and admiration. His work ranges from small houses to public buildings, such as the library and quadrangle at Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford; Jack Straw's Castle on Hampstead Heath and the New Common Room Building at Gray's Inn, London. The best known of his many restorations was the reconstruction of 10, 11 and 12 Downing Street.

Erith was a superb draughtsman and a selection of fine drawings, produced for the Royal Academy's Summer Exhibitions will be included in the exhibition. These will be augmented by a series of new photographs of Erith's work commissioned from the acclaimed architectural photographer Mark Fiennes.

This exhibition, curated by Lucy Archer, will not only provide the opportunity for a reassessment of Erith's architecture but it will also introduce his work to a new generation, too young to remember the exhibition which was held at the Royal Academy in 1976. During the thirty years since his death there has been a growing awareness of the continuing relevance of architectural tradition and there is much in the skilful blending of classical and vernacular in Erith's work to inspire designers of the twenty-first century.

Raymond Erith: Progressive Classicist will be accompanied by a lavish 80-page colour catalogue featuring essays by Lucy Archer, Ken Powell and George Saumarez Smith.

Catalogue available from Museum shop




History
10 Downing Street

By the 1950s, the material state of 10 Downing Street had reached crisis point. Bomb damage had worsened existing structural problems: the building was suffering from subsidence, sloping walls, twisting door frames and an enormous annual repair bill.

The Ministry of Works carried out a survey in 1954 into the state of the structure. The report bounced from Winston Churchill (1951 to 1955) to Anthony Eden (1955 to 1957) to Harold Macmillan (1957 to 1963) as one Prime Minister followed the other. Finally, a committee set up by Macmillan concluded that drastic action was required before the building fell or burnt down.

The committee put forward a range of options, including the complete demolition of Number 10, 11 and 12 and their replacement with a new building. That idea was rejected and it was decided that Number 12 should be rebuilt, and Numbers 10 and 11 should be strengthened and their historic features preserved.

The architect Raymond Erith was selected to supervise the work, which was expected to take 2 years and cost £500,000. It ended up taking a year longer than planned and costing double the original estimate. The foundations proved to be so rotten that concrete underpinning was required on a massive scale.

Number 10 was completely gutted. Walls, floors and even the columns in the Cabinet Room and Pillared Room proved to be rotten and had to be replaced. New features were added too, including a room facing onto Downing Street and a veranda at Number 11 for the Chancellor.

It was also discovered that the familiar exterior façade was not black at all, but yellow. The blackened colour was a product of two centuries of severe pollution. To keep the familiar appearance, the newly cleaned yellow bricks were painted black to match their previous colour. Erith's work was completed in 1963, but not long afterwards, dry rot became apparent and further repairs had to be undertaken.

Margaret Thatcher (1979 to 1990) appointed architect Quinlan Terry to refurbish the state drawing rooms at the end of the 1980s. Two of the rooms, the White Drawing Room and Terracotta Room, gained ornate plasterwork ceilings. In the White Drawing Room, this included adding the national emblems of England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales.

All the building work of the past few decades could have been ruined when a terrorist bomb exploded in 1991. An IRA mortar bomb was fired from a white transit van in Whitehall and exploded in the garden of Number 10, only a few metres away from where Prime Minister John Major (1990 to 1997) was chairing a Cabinet meeting to discuss the Gulf War.

Although no one was killed, it left a crater in the Number 10 gardens and blew in the windows of neighbouring houses. John Major and some of his staff moved into Admiralty Arch while damage caused by the bomb was repaired.

By 2006, it was clear that the Downing Street complex was no longer able to support the business of the Prime Minister's Office reliably. Independent surveys established that the building was no longer weather-tight, the heating system was failing, and the information and communications technology (ICT) network was at the limits of its operation. Power outages and water leaks were frequent occurrences and impacted significantly on the day-to-day operation of the Prime Minister's Office.

In addition to deterioration through age, pressures on the buildings had increased dramatically over recent years, through an increase in occupancy (stable at around 50 for many years) to around 170. In 2006, Prime Minister Tony Blair (1997 to 2007) authorised a new programme of improvements, with the building remaining operational throughout. Work was launched to address structural failure, renew the infrastructure, improve access and enhance the building's sustainability.

Structural issues were among the first to be tackled, and a phased exterior repair project was launched to address failing lead guttering, cracking brickwork and other structural issues. The distinctive black colourwash was also renewed, as it had faded away in many areas to reveal the yellow brickwork beneath. During the course of the works it was discovered that the façade of 11 Downing Street was unstable, and had to be secured using 225 stainless steel pins. All work was carried out in consultation with English Heritage.

Other projects have been undertaken to renew the building's ageing infrastructure and to replace many of the building's key services, including heating, fire protection and electrical power distribution. Sustainability is a key feature of the programme and a 10% reduction in carbon emissions was achieved during 2011. Rainwater harvesting was introduced in 2009, providing a sustainable source of water for the garden. Accessibility for disabled visitors has been significantly improved through the introduction of ramps and modernisation of lifts. Many of the public areas of the building have also been restored, including the front entrance hall, the state and small dining rooms and the study.


An ongoing programme is in place to upgrade facilities to modern standards, and to ensure the preservation of this historic building for years to come.

Saturday, 14 October 2023

Quinlan and Christine Terry at home and work in Suffolk

 




Morality, Architecture and Belief, Quinlan and Christine Terry at home and work in Suffolk

27th April 2022

https://bibleofbritishtaste.com/morality-and-architecture-belonging-and-belief-quinlan-and-christine-terry-at-home-and-work-in-suffolk

 

Quinlan Terry is a deeply serious proselytiser for classical architecture.

His traditional practice  – operating outside the mainstream architectural establishment – has gained him many plaudits and the occasional brickbat.

 

Half-hidden by a Wellingtonia, the house with its Georgian facade, into which Quinlan and Christine Terry moved with their four children in 1980. The classical facade disguises a much older house of red brick. Inside everything is in accord, harmonious and all of a piece and nothing is superfluous – this house has a poetic completeness.

 

Christine Terry was born in Poland in the year in which war broke out and came to England on finishing her Baccalaureate at the age of 16, to train at the AA  [Architectural Association] where she and Quinlan Terry met. ‘ I never really liked the Modern. I knew about the classical orders and how to put washes on watercolours, and Quin rather employed me to help him do a classical scheme.’(…)