Thursday, 6 February 2025

The Rise and Fall of the Iconic Big Healeys

Austin Healey 3000 MK III - VÍDEO - Classic review / Turn the subtitles on !






The Austin-Healey 3000 was introduced in 1959, replacing the Austin-Healey 100-6. Despite its new name, the changes were minor compared to those between the original 100 and the 100-6. The wheelbase and body were unchanged, as were the models, a 2+2 and a two-seater.


Austin-Healey 3000 Mark I (1959) at the 39. AvD Oldtimer Grand Prix 2011 Nurburgring
The original 3000 was built from March 1959 to March 1961 as models BN7 Mark I (2-seater) and BT7 Mark I (2+2 version). It only became known as the Mark I after the Mark II was released, having no designator prior. It featured a 2912 cc I6 engine, with twin SU carburetors and Girling front disc brakes. Wire wheels, overdrive gearbox, laminated windscreen, heater, adjustable steering column, detachable hard top, and two-tone paint were available as options.

A total of 13,650 Mark Is were made (2,825 BN7, and 10,825 BT7).

A BT7 3000 with hardtop and overdrive tested by The Motor magazine in 1960 had a top speed of 115 mph (185 km/h) and could accelerate from 0–60 mph (97 km/h) in 11.7 seconds. A fuel consumption of 21.6 miles per imperial gallon (13.1 L/100 km; 18.0 mpg-US) was recorded. The test car cost £1326 including taxes.

Mark II
Introduced in March 1961 as the BN7 Mark II (2-seat) and BT7 Mark II (2+2), the 3000 Mark II series came with three SU HS4 carburettors and an improved camshaft. However, the triple SUs proved difficult to balance and were replaced with two SU HS6 upon the introduction of the BJ7 (2+2) model in January 1962. With its debut the BN7 Mark II was discontinued in March 1962, and the BT7 Mark II in June 1962.

Other changes included a vertical barred front grille, wind-up windows instead of side curtains, an improved hood, and a wrap-around windscreen. Optional extras were similar to the Mark I, although the factory hardtop option was dropped with the BJ7's introduction. From August 1961 a brake servo was also available as an optional extra, which greatly improved braking performance. The BJ7 was discontinued in October 1963 with the introduction of the 3000 Mark III.

A 3000 Mark II BT7 with hardtop and overdrive tested by the British magazine The Motor in 1961 had a top speed of 112.9 mph (181.7 km/h) and could accelerate from 0–60 mph (97 km/h) in 10.9 seconds. A fuel consumption of 23.5 miles per imperial gallon (12.0 L/100 km; 19.6 mpg-US) was recorded. The test car cost £1362 including taxes.

A total of 11,564 were made: 355 BN7 Mark II, 5,096 BT7 Mark II, and 6,113 BJ7.

Mark III

1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mark III (North America)
The 3000 Mark III was launched in October 1963, and remained in production until the end of 1967, when manufacture of Austin-Healeys ceased. Only one further car was built in March 1968.[citation needed] Designated the BJ8, the 2+2 Mark III was the most powerful and luxurious of the big Healeys, with a standard walnut-veneer dash, wind-up windows, and a 150 hp (112 kW) engine. Added power came from a new camshaft and valve springs, twin SU 2" HD8 carburettors, and a new exhaust system design. Servo-assisted brakes were also standard. Options remained otherwise the same, except that the standard interior trim was downgraded to Ambla vinyl, with leather as an extra.

In May 1964 the Phase II version of the Mark III was released, which gained ground clearance through a modified rear chassis. In March 1965 the car received separate indicators.

A total of 17,712 Mark IIIs were made.

Sunday, 2 February 2025

Prince Andrew caught in a lie over contact with Epstein / Prince Andrew adviser’s letter to alleged China spy reveals closeness of ties


Prince Andrew adviser’s letter to alleged China spy reveals closeness of ties

 

Two-page document praises loyalty of Yang Tengbo and says he is ‘at very top of tree’ within Duke of York’s network

 

Dan Sabbagh Defence and security editor

Fri 31 Jan 2025 17.07 GMT

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/jan/31/prince-andrew-advisers-letter-to-alleged-china-spy-reveals-closeness-of-ties

 

The full text of a gushing letter written by Prince Andrew’s adviser to alleged Chinese spy Yang Tengbo reveals how intimate the relationship between the two had become in the aftermath of the prince’s disastrous 2019 interview with the BBC.

 

Extracts from the correspondence were quoted in a judgment upholding a decision to exclude Yang from the UK last month, but the two-page letter written by Dominic Hampshire at the end of March 2020 is eye-catching for its tone.

 

The letter had been relied on by the Home Office to demonstrate that Tengbo was able to generate relationships between prominent UK figures and Chinese officials.

 

Hampshire, a senior adviser to the Duke of York, complains in the letter – subsequently recovered by police from Yang’s laptop – that he had “watched numerous people disappear from his [the Duke’s] network” and that the prince had been surrounded by “red carpet chasers”.

 

But he goes on to to praise Yang as being one of “a very small number” of people previously connected to Andrew who had continued “to show total support and loyalty,” amid fierce criticism in the wake of the 2019 interview of the prince’s friendship with abuser Jeffrey Epstein.

 

The letter is among dozens of documents released by the immigration court on Friday, and has already been partially quoted in its judgment last month. Hampshire had assured Yang “you sit at the very top of a tree that many, many people would like to be on”.

 

The prince’s aide goes on to write that Yang was fortunate to attend a celebration of Andrew’s 60th birthday at Windsor the month before, which had been scaled down at the Queen’s request after he struggled to answer questions from the BBC’s Emily Maitlis over his friendship with Epstein.

 

“I also hope you fully understand what your invitation to his birthday party meant; this was not an engagement or an exclusive dinner. This was strictly his and his family’s personal life that very, very few people have the privilege to ever be part of,” Hampshire wrote.

 

“Moreover, remember that you were originally invited to their house and therefore on the much smaller original guest list. Despite press reports to the contrary, I know for a fact that there were very few people who were not able to make it.”

 

In the 2019 interview with the BBC, Andrew had said he cut off contact with Epstein in December 2010, but emails disclosed in a separate legal action have now revealed they were still exchanging messages in late February 2011.

 

Epstein suggested the Duke might see banker Jes Staley, and after a back and forth, Andrew wrote: “Keep in close touch and we’ll play some more soon.”

 

Yang, a Chinese-born entrepreneur who had lived in the UK, was excluded from the UK by then home secretary, Suella Braverman, in March 2023 on the advice of MI5, and the court concluded that she “was entitled to conclude that the applicant represented a risk to the national security of the United Kingdom”.

 

He maintains the allegations against him are “entirely unfounded”. On Friday, he said he was seeking permission to appeal against the court’s decision in a statement.

 

A witness statement from Yang provided to the immigration court said that he first met Hampshire after he had been sat next to Andrew during a VIP dinner hosted by Buckingham Palace in October 2019 and he was advised by the prince to contact him. “The duke wrote Dominic’s number down on a piece of paper,” Yang said.

 

Hampshire’s letter describes how rapidly their relationship developed after meeting at the Corinthia hotel in London on 23 October. “Immediately, I learned of a whole new level of obsessive confidentiality and a slightly different way of communicating,” a sentence partly quoted in the court’s judgment.

 

“We have dealt with the aftermath of a hugely ill-advised and unsuccessful television interview; we have wisely navigated our way around former private secretaries and we have found a way to carefully remove those people who we don’t completely trust,” he added, using language that has been partly quoted by the court.

 

Hampshire, a former Scots guard and long-time friend and fixer for the duke, heaps praise on Yang’s punctuality: “You bring a completely new level to timekeeping – I aim to be at every meeting at least 15 minutes before it starts and without exception, you are already there!”.

 

The purpose of the letter, Hampshire says, is “a personal note from me to you” and apologises for its length, which he says is “very British”. It nevertheless emphasises the closeness of their relationship: “After this short amount of time, I feel an unusual bond of friendship, trust, support and loyalty.”

 

Seven months later, another letter from Hampshire says that Yang is authorised to act on behalf of an investment scheme called the Eurasian fund in China. It says he has the authority to act on behalf of Andrew “in engagements with potential partners and investors in China” but also asks that “this relationship remains confidential”.


Spy scandal: Prince Andrew targeted because he has 'a lot of vulnerabili...

Saturday, 1 February 2025

France's president Macron announces Louvre renovations as Italy offers t...

‘We won’t come again’: dazed visitors fed up with overcrowded Louvre

 


‘We won’t come again’: dazed visitors fed up with overcrowded Louvre

 

Paris attraction in need of overhaul amid complaints of leaks, long waits, lack of signage – and too many people

 

Angelique Chrisafis

Angelique Chrisafis in Paris

Tue 28 Jan 2025 06.00 CET

https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2025/jan/28/we-wont-come-again-dazed-visitors-fed-up-with-overcrowded-louvre-paris

 

As the crowds poured out of the Louvre, the look of dazed exhaustion on many faces confirmed what the museum’s director had warned last week: a trip to Paris’s biggest cultural attraction has become a “physical ordeal”.

 

Myriam, 65, a former secondary school science teacher had driven from Belgium with her husband to show their 12-year-old granddaughter the Mona Lisa. They left disappointed. “I think the Louvre is a victim of its own success,” she said. “We won’t come again.”

 

They had squeezed through huge crowds on Monday to try to catch a glimpse of Leonardo da Vinci’s masterpiece, but found the room badly designed and with no proper flow of people. They had been baffled by the lack of signage in the vast wings.

 

“There are so many people. Lots of rooms aren’t numbered. The staff are very friendly, but you feel they’re more there to show people the way than to protect the paintings,” said Myriam. “Then there’s the wait to get in – we had time-slot tickets but still had to wait 45 minutes outside. I hadn’t realised we needed separate tickets to the temporary exhibition and it was sold out.”

 

On Tuesday, the French president, Emmanuel Macron, will deliver a speech at the Louvre in which he is expected to unveil details of new investment, which could involve major overhaul – even a potential additional entrance. But the work required is vast and the government is facing severe budget constraints.

 

One of the largest arts centres on the planet and the world’s most visited museum, the Louvre attracts more than 8 million people a year. When it was modernised in the 1980s, it was designed to welcome 4 million visitors a year, yet now handles more than double that number and is increasingly stressing out its visitors.

 

On Monday, a 74-year-old clinical psychologist from Paris, who said she had been a regular visitor to the Louvre for 40 years, exited the popular temporary exhibition, Figures of the Fool, feeling battered.

 

The Louvre is the most popular museum in the world, and a major cultural hub in Paris. Photograph: Blondet Eliot/Abaca/Rex/Shutterstock

 

“I’m leaving in a state of extreme fatigue and I’ve vowed never to visit again,” she said, declining to give her name. “The noise is so unbearable under the glass pyramid; it’s like a public swimming pool. Even with a timed ticket, there’s an hour to wait outside. I can’t do it anymore. Museums are supposed to be fun, but it’s no fun anymore. There’s no pleasure in coming here anymore. And to get out you’re made to walk the length of a shopping arcade to force people to buy things – commercial interests have taken over everything.”

 

The Louvre’s director, Laurence des Cars, warned in a damning note to the culture minister this month that the facilities were below international standards, the visits were not easy and involved long waits, and the building was in poor repair, including leaks and poor temperature controls. Despite investment in new outposts of the Louvre, including in the northern former coalmining town of Lens and in Abu Dhabi, the vast Paris museum has not had a significant structural overhaul in decades.

 

Macron, who chose the Louvre as the backdrop to his presidential victory speech in 2017, has decided to personally address the crisis. After the recent renovation of Notre Dame cathedral five years after it was damaged by fire, the Louvre could be Macron’s next legacy project, as he seeks to focus on issues that could unite the deeply divided political class and voters. “The Louvre is the most-visited museum in world, it deserves all our care,” said one Élysée official.

 

Another Élysée source said: “The situation is urgent and the Louvre is our shared heritage. France’s power in the coming years is its capacity to show its independence on a range of issues, particularly as a cultural exception.”

 

The Louvre, which has been used for diplomacy and soft power by several presidents, is seen as too important for its image to be tarnished.

 

Nurperi, 40, a physiotherapist from Ankara in Turkey, who had visited with her children, enjoyed the Islamic art and braved the crowds for the Mona Lisa. “The art works were beautiful,” she said, but conceded there could have been better information and signage, more toilets and, ideally, less queuing.

 

Véronique, a retired administrator from Paris said: “The Louvre is just so huge. I went to the Musée d’Orsay recently and, although it’s also popular, it seemed more accessible, and more human – much less crazy than the Louvre.”