“The
secrets of Queen Victoria ’s
sixth child, Princess Louise, may be destined to remain hidden forever. What
was so dangerous about this artistic, tempestuous royal that her life has been
documented more by rumour and gossip than hard facts? I first came across
Princess Louise’s name when researching my biographies of Lizzie Siddal and
Kate Perugini, I wondered who this art-loving princess really was. When I
started to investigate, often thwarted by inexplicable secrecy, I discovered a
fascinating woman, modern before her time, whose story has been shielded for
years from public view.
Louise
was a sculptor and painter, friend to the Pre-Raphaelites and a keen member of
the Aesthetic movement. The most feisty of the Victorian princesses, she kicked
against her mother’s controlling nature and remained fiercely loyal to her
brothers – especially the sickly Leopold and the much-maligned Bertie. She
sought out other unconventional women, including Josephine Butler, Elizabeth
Garrett Anderson and George Eliot, and campaigned for education and health
reform and for the rights of women. She battled with her indomitable mother for
permission to practice the ‘masculine’ art of sculpture and go to art college –
and in doing so became the first British princess to attend a public school.
The
rumours of Louise’s colourful love life persist even today, with hints of love
affairs dating as far back as her teenage years, and notable scandals included
an illegitimate baby with her brother’s tutor and rumoured romantic
entanglements with her married sculpting tutor Joseph Edgar Boehm and her
sister Princess Beatrice’s handsome husband, Liko. True to rebellious form, she
refused all royal suitors and became the first member of the royal family to
marry a commoner since the sixteenth century. “Spirited and lively, The Mystery
of Princess Louise is richly packed with arguments, intrigues, scandals and
secrets, and is a vivid portrait of a princess desperate to escape her
inheritance.”
The Mystery of Princess Louise: Queen Victoria 's Rebellious
Daughter by Lucinda Hawksley – review
This life of a
spirited princess who thrived despite her upbringing is both revealing and
enthralling
Rachel Cooke
Sunday 29 December 2013 / http://www.theguardian.com/books/2013/dec/29/mystery-of-princess-louise-review
Princess Louise was the sixth child of
Queen Victoria, a woman who famously loathed babies, and from her very first
wail, Her Majesty was apt to see her as odd and difficult. When she was feeling
generous, she would attribute her daughter's determined, sparky personality to the
fact that she had come into the world in 1848, the year of revolution:
"She was born in the most eventful times & ought to be something
peculiar in consequence." When she was not feeling generous, which was
most of the time, she would insist that "Loosy" was backward:
"God bless the dear child – who is so affectionate and has so many
difficulties to contend with," she wrote to Louise's older sister Vicky in
1864. "I hope and trust she will get over them… and still become a most
useful member of the human family."
Even by the mendacious, self-deceiving
standards of Victoria ,
this was some lie. Not only was Louise more intelligent than the majority of
her eight siblings, she was also, in spite of her loopy upbringing, emotionally
adept, and though this would later cause her some pain when it came to matters
of the heart, it made her popular with the public, even as the rumours swirled.
It's these whispers that make Lucinda
Hawksley's new biography such an intriguing prospect. In old age, Louise was
just another of the batty Victorian relatives (copyright: the Duke of Windsor)
who rattled around the great royal retirement home that was Kensington Palace .
But as a young woman, her life was complicated and modern. Did the teenage
Louise have a baby by Walter Stirling, the devoted tutor of her haemophiliac
brother, Leopold? Did she enjoy a long love affair with Sir Joseph Boehm, the
Queen's sculptor in ordinary, a romance that only ended when he died as they
made love in his London
studio shortly before Christmas 1890? And was her husband, the Marquess of
Lorne (later 9th Duke of Argyll), whom she married at the insistence of her
mother in 1871, a
homosexual whose night prowls she tried to prevent by bricking up the windows
of her apartment?
Hawksley has answers to all these
questions. In essence: yes, yes and yes. But her assertions are based on
instinct, contemporary gossip and the matching up of dates, times and places
rather than revelatory new documents. The princess's files at the royal
archives remain closed, while at Inveraray
Castle , the seat of the
Argylls, the family papers are strictly off-limits. Hawksley doesn't waste
precious time on the various ways she was thwarted, but the reader will
consider this bizarre. Louise died in 1939; she had no legitimate children; the
boy she purportedly gave up for adoption died in 1907. Why shouldn't the truth
come out? It's not as if she murdered anyone.
What she did murder was the idea of what a
princess should be. Louise was a practical girl; in the Swiss Cottage built for
the children at Osborne House on the Isle of Wight ,
she learned to cook, a skill she practised, to the amazement of her staff, for
the rest of her life. She wove a carpet for her beloved brother, Bertie (later
Edward VII). But art was her first love and once she'd persuaded her mother
that she might have her own studio – no mean feat, given that the widowed Victoria wanted her
daughters to breathe the same miserable air as her 24 hours a day – there was
no holding her back. She studied hard, and became a sculptor; wanting to be
taken seriously, she insisted on being paid for her work. Was she any good?
Opinions vary, but the magnificently chilly statue of Victoria
she made to mark the golden jubilee, and which still stands outside Kensington Palace , pulls off the trick of
flattering its subject even as it suggests the iceberg that stood in for the
Queen's heart.
Art and life, for Louise, were intimately
connected. Her friends and associates included Rossetti, Millais, Whistler and,
more controversially, George Eliot (who was living in sin). Her clothes were
fashionable, her jewellery sometimes homemade. A supporter of suffrage for
women, she was in touch with both Josephine Butler and Elizabeth Garrett. No
wonder, then, that she enjoyed her share of love affairs. No wonder, too, that
she refused to be married off by her increasingly panicky mother to a European
royal; exile was not for her. Lorne, offered as an alternative, was not
precisely a catch. He washed rarely, his clothes were eccentric, he was
convinced he had second sight, and he refused to let his wife use his billiard
table. But she accepted him as the least bad option and went with him to Canada when he
was appointed its governor – even if she didn't stay long. The marriage was not
happy. But it was convenient. They could live apart, together.
Hawksley puts her facts in the service of
her hunches with aplomb. I wasn't entirely convinced by her thesis about
Louise's illegitimate son. It's hard to believe that the tyrannical, outwardly
prudish Victoria knew of her daughter's pregnancy; if she had, would she really
have been so happy to holiday with her so soon after the child was supposedly
born? But I bought everything else, and the book is satisfyingly replete with
eye-popping stories of life at the various palaces, even if they're not all
new. Victoria ,
as usual, comes out of it exceedingly badly, something that makes Louise's
evident sanity all the more impressive.
It's odd that while Hawksley tells us that
Louise worried about her niece Alexandra and her obsession with a monk called
Rasputin, she fails to mention the murder of the Romanovs. But I noticed the
omission only when I'd put the book down. I was, I'm afraid, far too caught up
with this improbable princess, a beautiful, charming woman who loved to bicycle
and to smoke, who was always happy to share her recipe for oyster paté and who
holidayed, at the end of her life, in Sidmouth, where she enjoyed the table
d'hote at the exclusive Fortfield hotel.
Just bought my copy -can't wait to read it! Thanks for sharing.
ReplyDelete