Even the monarchy doesn’t want a new royal yacht.
But Liz Truss does
Royal Yacht Britannia was decommissioned in 1997. Now
the Tory leadership hopeful is backing another one despite minimal public and
political support
Esther
Addley
Sat 23 Jul
2022 07.00 BST
All the
clocks on the Royal Yacht Britannia, now moored beside the blue car park at
Ocean Terminal shopping centre in Leith, near Edinburgh, show the same time: 3.01pm.
That was the moment on 11 December 1997 that the Queen stepped off the ship for
the last time, famously weeping as a Royal Navy band piped a farewell to the
soon-to-be-mothballed vessel.
No one, not
even the Queen herself, can seriously have expected ever to see another royal
yacht. But 25 years later, here we are. On Thursday, as the country recovered
from state of emergency temperatures and amid an escalating cost of living
disaster, Liz Truss sought to strengthen her case to be Britain’s next prime
minister by pledging support for another national big ship.
“I do
support the idea of promoting our trade around the world,” she told reporters
in Peterborough. However – new broom and all that – she wouldn’t do it Boris
Johnson’s way. Rather than expecting taxpayers to stump up the projected £200m
cost, “what I would be seeking is to get investment into a yacht, looking to
the private sector to assist with that to make it financially viable”. Sponsors
with nine-figure marketing budgets, do step this way.
What is it
about the thought of a big British ship that gets some people so excited? The
Daily Telegraph has been campaigning for one since 2016, not coincidentally the
same year the paper and its then columnist helped secure Brexit. Johnson
announced last May that a new “national flagship” would indeed be built,
“reflecting the UK’s burgeoning status as a great, independent maritime trading
nation”.
The
Ministry of Defence, with a £16bn backlog in its equipment budget, isn’t keen
to pick up the tab, however. Truss’s rival Rishi Sunak, while chancellor, was
also at odds with Johnson on the subject, with a source telling the Sunday
Times last year that there was “a huge row” over funding; another described the
yacht plans as “a complete and utter shitshow”.
The British
royal family has had its own yacht since 1660 when Charles II, newly restored
to the English throne, bought the small coal ship on which he had fled for
France a decade earlier, naming it, rakishly, HMY Royal Escape. Eighty-two
ships later, Britannia was launched in 1953 with a bottle of “Empire wine” – a
rationing-friendly substitute for champagne.
The new
Queen and her husband were closely involved in its design, which made it
“rather special”, the Duke told an interviewer in 1995: “All the other places
we live in had been built by predecessors.” Britannia was extensively used by
the royal family and in almost 1,000 state visits, but became increasingly
costly to maintain and Tony Blair took the decision in 1997 not to recommission
it, a decision (unlike some others) that he later said he regretted.
Today,
however, it is not clear who really wants a yacht. Not the public – YouGov
found only 29% in favour last year. Not the royal family, who were unhappy
about plans to name a new ship after the Duke of Edinburgh and have called it
“not something we have asked for”.
Senior
military figures aren’t keen either, among them R Adm Chris Parry, a former
senior naval commander (“Frankly the narrative around this has been really
poor. And the designs I’ve seen – I wouldn’t go to sea in that”). And many
Tories, too, agree with Lord (Ken) Clarke who told the BBC it was “silly
populist nonsense”.
Six weeks
before Conservative members choose Britain a prime minister, however, Truss
knows that talking about a yacht while saying she wants to privately fund it
“allows her to pledge support for the idea without it ever happening,” as
Sunder Katwala, director of the thinktank British Future, noted.
Sunak,
meanwhile, is yet to be drawn on his plans for the yacht if he wins, though as
some have observed, if need be the multimillionaire could comfortably fund it
himself.
No comments:
Post a Comment