Secrets, lies and passion smoulder beneath the glamorous and
stylish world of the early 1960s, in the brand new drama Breathless.
Is that Don Draper? - No, it's Jack Davenport as Dr Otto
Powell in Breathless. Photograph: ITV
|
Breathless; Trust Me I'm a Doctor – TV review
Yes, it's the 60s,
and there's smoking, sex and even a Don Draper type – but don't call it the
British Mad Men
Sam Wollaston
The Guardian, Friday 11 October 2013 / http://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2013/oct/11/breathless-tv-review
I saw the WikiLeaks movie, The Fifth Estate, the other
night. Benedict Cumberbatch is fantastic but the film isn't, for several
reasons, one of which is that it doesn't really work visually. It's a problem
with a lot of drama about the 21st century. People now spend their entire lives
staring into screens and communicating via text. Looking at a screen of people
looking into screens isn't a very fulfilling experience. You have to go back to
the 20th century to find people actually talking to each other, having
old-fashioned touchy sex not Skype sex, expressing emotions not emoticons, and
anger in a way that isn't snapping shut a laptop. It's maybe why there's so
much period drama about.
In Breathless, ITV's latest period piece, we're in London in
1961. Of course, being about the 60s it's already been called the British Mad
Men (as The Hour was, and that wasn't even set in the 60s). Med Men might be
better, given it's a hospital drama. And Dr Otto Powell (Jack Davenport) is the
Don Draper character – you know, suave, smoking (in every sense), Brylcreemed
etc. He just has to walk into a room, and women spread their legs. Well, he is
a gynaecologist.
Not just a devilish cad though, Dr Otto is also an unlikely
champion of choice and performs abortions (still illegal) on the sly.
"Otto, is that you, I've been such a silly muffin," he's greeted by a
silly aristocratic muffin (scone?) with a extra unwanted bun you know where.
He's kinda Don Draper meets Vera Drake, then.
There's no such complexity from Dr Powell's doctor
colleagues. All male, of course, and all randy as Jack Russells; after a brisk,
rude group round of the wards, they're all off doing their damnedest to hop on
and off the nurses like they're the Routemasters plying Piccadilly. I say, are
you headed for Eros, room for one more on top, eh?
So 1961 doesn't look very jolly for a woman. The music may
be getting a little better, the dresses too. And this so-called sexual
revolution is gaining some momentum. Who's it for, though? Maybe the pill,
which was around then, I believe, wasn't in general circulation yet. Because if
you join in the revolution, chances are you're going to get knocked up by some
twit. And if you don't get to Dr Otto (who's the one you really want to be
with) in time, you're going to have to spend the rest of your life in the
twit's kitchen. Quite a cool, 60s kitchen, admittedly, possibly even with a few
new electric appliances about the place depending on the salary of your twit –
but he's still a twit, and his kitchen's still a kitchen.
Breathless is good at that; the 60s kitchens, the dresses,
the Brylcreem and the buses, the Austins and the Morrises, the drink-driving.
Also at the paradoxes of the age – the looking both forwards and backwards, the
rampant sex and rampant sexism, the shiny new NHS and the lingering stuffiness
etc. It looks great, and it captures an age, a fascinating one – key elements
in any period drama. Plus there are no screens or texting. You can forget the
modern world for an hour (except that you're probably tweeting along).
But then Downton Abbey does all that too, and Downton is
posh froth. What's beneath the gloss of Breathless? I'm talking about the drama
part of period drama – its ability to get a hold of you so you become
emotionally tangled up, go on thinking about it and the characters, new people
in your life, after the credits roll. And I'm not getting that. Perhaps it
doesn't matter – you can admire the shine, without worrying about what is – or
isn't – underneath. Just don't go calling it the British Mad Men.
Trust Me I'm a Doctor (BBC2) is brilliant; I learned so many
interesting things. Like BMI – the fat thing not the regional airline – is
rubbish. OK, not rubbish, but it can be misleading, as an indicator of health;
you can be fat and fit. I can be fat and fit. I also don't need to drink two
litres of water a day. Yay, water's boring.
I'm a bit confused about whether I should take a quarter of
an aspirin a day: it seems to depend on which distinguished expert you listen
to. I'm certainly going to wash my hands a lot more often and a lot more
thoroughly because a third of us have faeces on them … NO! I don't, you do, go
away. And I'm going to bed early, because sleep deprivation is linked to all
sorts of horrible and life-shortening ailments. Put another way, Newsnight
gives you cancer.
Breathless is so much more than a Mad Men rip-off
EVERYONE has been
banging on – well, OK, not everyone, but quite a few people – about ITV’s new
60s drama Breathless, and how it’s allegedly ripping off the cult US series Mad
Men.
By Mike Ward
Published 10th October 2013 / http://www.dailystar.co.uk/columnists/mike-ward/344281/Breathless-is-so-much-more-than-a-Mad-Men-rip-off
Take it from me, these people are all idiots. And it's OK
for me to say that because I was initially one of them.
Being quite a shallow human being, I took one look at the
distinctive 60s style of the whole thing – the fashions, the cars, the home
furnishings, the music, the opening titles, the fact that everyone was smoking
their tar-caked little lungs out – and thought, yeah, d’you know what, I’m
going to slag this series off as a Mad Men rip-off, I bet no other TV critic
will think of that, aren’t I jolly clever and original and perceptive, huh?
But now that I’ve watched episode one again, properly this
time – followed by previews of episodes two, three and four – I realise just what
an ignorant ninny I was being. Breathless is, in fact, superb.
All right, so the influences from that American series are
fairly transparent, but is that really such a big deal? Pretty much every show
on television borrows ideas from other programmes, a huge proportion of them
from America (Ricky Gervais’ comedies, for example, and Jonathan Ross’s chat
shows, are massively influenced by their US counterparts).
Sod originality. What really matters is the substance. If
superficial 60s snazziness were all Breathless had to offer us, the whole thing
would have disintegrated within the first 20 minutes of episode one, like one
of those tragic Bake Off trifles where the custard refuses to set.
Instead, it had me hooked. Britain was such a different
place in 1961, the year the story gets underway, that the characters in
Breathless, working in the gynaecological department of a leading London
hospital, are having to deal with situations that seem fascinatingly alien to
us.
Women weren’t allowed the new contraceptive pill, for
example, unless they were married. And only then with their husband’s
permission. Also, abortion was still illegal, which meant reluctantly pregnant
women would resort to terrifying backstreet terminations, carrying all sorts of
appalling risks.
The abortion thing is key here, because Jack Davenport’s
character, charismatic surgeon Otto Powell, offers these desperate women a
better alternative – still wholly illegal, and enough to get him struck off and
banged up if word ever got out, but carried out safely, sensitively and
responsibly.
It was when he defended his actions in episode one to nurse
Angela Wilson (Catherine Steadman), who’d unwittingly found herself in
attendance at one of these so-called “specials” of his – that we sensed there
may be more to this guy than we’d initially given him credit for.
He insisted he was helping these people out of a nightmare
they shouldn’t be forced to suffer – and he sounded very much as though he
meant it.
“The law,” he told her, rejecting her protests “makes
miserable lives and miserable women.”
So, OK, maybe he’s not just a rich, suave, self-satisfied
womaniser after all. Otto may be smitten by nurse Angela (so am I, but that’s
another story). And the more she rejects his advances – possibly because Otto
sounds like a name better suited to a Labrador – the more he relishes the
chase. In that sense, he seems just your average adulterous slimeball.
But the marriage that Otto is putting at risk, we’ll come to
realise, isn’t quite right. Not so much in the sense that it’s a miserable one,
more that it’s an act of some sort, an arrangement he and his wife Elizabeth
have both agreed to, for reasons we’ve yet to figure out. And beneath their
trappings of wealth and suburban respectability, they’re nursing a significant
secret.
Elsewhere, we’ve just witnessed ninnyish junior consultant
Dr Richard Truscott (Oliver Chris) marry pregnant ex-nurse Jean Meecher (Zoe
Boyle). Jean has actually lost the baby on the morning of the wedding, but has
insisted on going ahead with the ceremony – and not telling the groom about the
miscarriage, terrified he’ll call the whole thing off. Will he eventually find
out in any case? If so, will he go ballistic?
Richard and Jean’s is a relationship already weighed down
with a whole heap of 60s issues. A working-class lass wedding a posh chap. A
bride walking down the aisle when she’s supposedly up the duff. A nurse being
forced to quit work because that’s what the rules used to demand if you got
hitched to a doctor. All wrapped up in one merry little marital package.
Not so much another age as another planet. I shan’t go into
any more detail about Breathless for now, just in case I give away some vital
plot twist (you know, like I stupidly did when I mentioned the Martian invasion
in next week’s Downton).
Suffice to say this is another cracking ITV drama – as
gritty as it is stylish. And rest assured, the best is yet to come.
Review: Breathless – Series 1 Episode 2 – ITV
By Lina Talbot
Arts
Last updated: Wednesday, 16 October 2013 / http://blogs.independent.co.uk/2013/10/17/review-breathless-%E2%80%93-series-1-episode-2-itv/
Spoiler Alert: This review assumes you have already watched
episode 2 of ‘Breathless’.
Female viewers must be feeling relieved after every episode
of Breathless because things are different now. The control exerted by social
codes and above all, by male authority over women, tied them down to being
little more than kitchen maids and baby makers. Male viewers I hope will agree
with Mr Powell, the debonair doctor with a dark past, that to keep women this
miserable makes no sense.
For women to become properly liberated after the Second
World War took a strangely long time. Men must have been very afraid, perhaps
more so in the upper echelons where a certain family life needed to be on
display. As the Powells’ marriage with one sprog and one housemaid demonstrates
– concealing beneath it some terrible truth.
Natasha Little gives the most plausible performance as the
fearful yet restrained Mrs Powell, whether supporting her husband and son or
confronting Iain Glen’s sinister Chief Inspector Mulligan. It’s enjoyable
stuff, so I am not going to “Wiki” what British commandos were doing in Cyprus
in ’53 and spoil the mystery.
The other main characters have a touch of caricature about
them. Even Jack Davenport as Powell overdoes the jolly father role. He also
overplays his perplexity in the presence of Nurse Wilson (Catherine Steadman)
after some very minor encounters. Perhaps she represents the future and the
challenge facing these Sixties social paragons, but I may be over-interpreting.
The Enderbys (Shaun Dingwall and Joanna Page) are most
watchable in their struggle to achieve higher status, though sadly they have a
sexual problem to solve too. Baby making in these days is certainly fraught
with difficulties. Happily, pills for some women’s problems are now available
if you know the right chap, which former Nurse Meecher, now Mrs Jean Truscott
(Zoe Boyle), does. As a modern girl struggling with Sixties society, she is not
telling her husband and - clap on the
back for the man – neither is Powell. Or is he being all things to all people?
So the sexual charade of the Sixties continues, this time
with Pippa Haywood popping up as the cheated on wife whom her husband wishes to
quieten with a dose of Librium. He warns Mr Truscott (Oliver Chris), who
hesitates to prescribe this: “We can go and see the top man.” Later his wife
holds a scalpel over his mistress’s head as a different sort of warning –
presumably the only justice available for the wronged woman. Of course her
mention of Holloway immediately recalls Haywood’s recent outing in Prisoners’
Wives.
Then there is the romantic subplot. Mmm. It is silly… but
despite that charming, as the nervous Powell waits amongst the plebs in a
street cafe for the object of his desire. He is now aware of Wilson’s
background and her actions in helping Miss Mulligan (Holli Dempsey) escape
marriage. He doesn’t yet know that she is Jean’s sister, nor that Mulligan has
him by the goolies.
Once again the scenes are lovely to behold. In the
Truscotts’ new flat, for example, the camera beautifully presents both its
décor and its metaphorical meaning as the cage for the new wife. Indeed the
formidable exterior has the look of Wormwood Scrubs. The Sixties’ hospital ward
rounds become comic parades, the private consultation almost an assignation.
I bet the writer and director Paul Unwin is having a ball.
He has built up considerable expertise with medical drama, having co-created
Casualty and worked on Holby City. Most recently he was lead director on the US
network series Combat Hospital. No doubt he realised that people who watch
medical drama are more interested in the social milieu of the protagonists, and
this time he focuses on the milieu.
Though the dialogue still bothers me. It’s too unnatural –
comic book even – I presume Unwin intends to mimic Sixties TV shows in the
mould of Danger Man and The Avengers. With such a visual feast, a terse
dialogue may be a blessing, providing the bon mots keep coming. This week
Matron (Diane Fletcher) offers her reactionary guideline for women: “we need to
be tamed.” OK, the blame does not lie entirely with the men then.
No comments:
Post a Comment