1790s:
Women: "age of undress"; dressing
like statues coming to life;filet-Greek classical hairstyle; simple muslin
chemise w. ribbon; sheer; empire silhouette; pastel fabrics; natural makeup;
bare arms; blonde wigs; accessorized with (to demonstrate individuality): hats,
turbans, gloves, jewelry, small handbags - reticules, shawls, handkerchiefs;
parasols; fans; Maja: layered skirt
Men: trousers w. perfect tailoring; linen;
coats cutaway in the front w. long tails; cloaks; hats; the Dandy; Majo: short
jacket
In the
French Revolution, the sans-culottes ("without
culottes") were the radical left-wing partisans of the lower classes;
typically urban labourers, which dominated France . Though ill-clad and
ill-equipped, they made up the bulk of the Revolutionary army during the early
years of the French Revolutionary Wars.The appellation refers to the
fashionable culottes (silk knee-breeches) of the moderate bourgeois
revolutionaries, as distinguished from the working class sans-culottes, who
traditionally wore pantalons (trousers)
Cockades
were widely worn by revolutionaries beginning in 1789. They now pinned the
blue-and-red cockade of Paris
onto the white cockade of the Ancien Régime - thus producing the original
Tricolore cockade. Later, distinctive colours and styles of cockade would
indicate the wearer's faction—although the meanings of the various styles were
not entirely consistent, and varied somewhat by region and period.
In
revolutionary France , the
cap or bonnet rouge was first seen publicly in May 1790, at a festival in Troyes adorning a statue representing the nation, and at Lyon , on a lance carried by the goddess Libertas. To this
day the national emblem of France, Marianne, is shown wearing a Phrygian cap.
The caps were often knitted by women known as Tricoteuse who sat beside the
guillotine during public executions in Paris in the French Revolution,
supposedly continuing to knit in between executions.
Early
depiction of the tricolour in the hands of a sans-culotte during the French
Revolution.
The Liberty
cap, also known as the Phrygian cap, or pileus, is a brimless, felt cap that is
conical in shape with the tip pulled forward. The cap was originally worn by
ancient Romans and Greeks. The cap implies ennobling effects, as seen in its
association with Homer's Ulysses and the mythical twins, Castor and Pollux. The
emblem's popularity during the French Revolution is due in part to its
importance in ancient Rome :
its use alludes to the Roman ritual of manumission of slaves, in which a freed
slave receives the bonnet as a symbol of his newfound liberty. The Roman
tribune Lucius Appuleius Saturninus incited the slaves to insurrection by
displaying a pileus as if it were a standard.
The pileus
cap is often red in color. This type of cap was worn by revolutionaries at the
fall of the Bastille. According to the Revolutions de Paris, it became
"the symbol of the liberation from all servitudes, the sign for
unification of all the enemies of despotism." The pileus competed with the Phrygian cap, a
similar cap that covered the ears and the nape of the neck, for popularity. The
Phrygian cap eventually supplanted the pileus and usurped its symbolism,
becoming synonymous with republican liberty.
The
Incroyables ("incredibles") and their female counterparts, the
Merveilleuses ("marvelous women", roughly equivalent to
"fabulous divas"), were members of a fashionable aristocratic
subculture in Paris
during the French Directory (1795–1799). Whether as catharsis or in a need to
reconnect with other survivors of the Reign of Terror, they greeted the new
regime with an outbreak of luxury, decadence, and even silliness. They held
hundreds of balls and started fashion trends in clothing and mannerisms that
today seem exaggerated, affected, or even effete (decadent, self-indulgent).
Some devotees of the trend preferred to be called "incoyable" or
"meveilleuse", thus avoiding the letter R, as in
"révolution." When this period ended, society took a more sober and
modest turn.
Many
Incroyables were "nouveaux riches" who had gained their wealth from
selling arms and money lending. Members of the ruling classes were also among
the movement's leading figures, and the group heavily influenced the politics,
clothing, and arts of the period. They emerged from the muscadins, a term for
dandyish anti-Jacobin street gangs in Paris
from 1793 who were important politically
for some two years; the terms are often used interchangeably, though the
muscadins were of a lower social background, being largely middle-class.
The
Merveilleuses scandalized Paris
with dresses and tunics modeled after the ancient Greeks and Romans, cut of
light or even transparent linen and gauze. Sometimes so revealing they were
termed "woven air", many gowns displayed cleavage and were too tight
to allow pockets. To carry even a handkerchief, the ladies had to use small
bags known as reticules.They were fond of wigs, often choosing blonde because
the Paris Commune had banned blond wigs, but they also wore them in black,
blue, and green. Enormous hats, short curls like those on Roman busts, and
Greek-style sandals were the rage. The sandals were tied above the ankle with
crossed ribbons or strings of pearls. Exotic and expensive scents fabricated by
perfume houses like Parfums Lubin were worn as both for style and as indicators
of social station. Thérésa Tallien, known as "Our Lady of Thermidor",
wore expensive rings on the toes of her bare feet and gold circlets on her
legs.
The
Incroyables wore eccentric outfits: large earrings, green jackets, wide
trousers, huge neckties, thick glasses, and hats topped by "dog
ears", their hair falling on their ears. Their musk-based fragrances
earned them too the derogatory nickname muscadins among the lower classes,
already applied to a wide group of anti-jacobins (see above). They wore bicorne
hats and carried bludgeons, which they referred to as their "executive
power." Hair was often shoulder-length, sometimes pulled up in the back
with a comb to imitate the hairstyles of the condemned. Some sported large
monocles, and they frequently affected a lisp and sometimes a stooped
hunchbacked posture.
In addition
to Madame Tallien, famous Merveilleuses included Anne Françoise Elizabeth
Lange, Jeanne Françoise Julie Adélaïde Récamier, and two very popular Créoles:
Fortunée Hamelin and Hortense de Beauharnais. Hortense, a daughter of the
Empress Josephine, married Louis Bonaparte and became the mother of Napoleon
III. Fortunée was not born rich, but she became famous for her salons and her
string of prominent lovers. Parisian society compared Germaine de Staël and Mme
Raguet to Minerva and Juno and named their garments for Roman deities: gowns
were styled Flora or Diana, and tunics were styled à la Ceres or Minerva.
The leading
Incroyable, Paul François Jean Nicolas, vicomte de Barras, was one of the five
Directors who ran the Republic
of France and gave the
period its name. He hosted luxurious feasts attended by royalists, repentant
Jacobins, ladies, and courtesans. Since divorce was now legal, sexuality was
looser than in the past. However, de Barras' reputation for immorality may have
been a factor in his later overthrow, a coup that brought the French Consulate
to power and paved the way for Napoleon Bonaparte.
The Bals
des victimes, or victims' balls, were balls that were said to have been put on
by dancing societies after the Reign of Terror. To be admitted to these
societies and balls, one had to be a near relative of someone who had been
guillotined during the Terror. The balls came to prominence after the death of
Robespierre, supposedly first being held in early 1795 and first mentioned in
popular writing in 1797.
The bals
des victimes allegedly began as part of a rash of merrymaking and balls that
broke out as the Terror came to an end. According to one source, they emerged
as an idea of youths whose parents and other near relatives had gone to the
guillotine, and to whom the revolution had now restored their relatives'
confiscated property. Reveling in the return of fortune they established
aristocratic, decadent balls open to themselves alone.
Descriptions
of the balls' particulars vary, but the common thread is that they were a
cathartic device in which the participants acted out the emotional impact of
their relatives' executions and the social upheavals occurring as a result of
the revolution. Many who described the balls, often generations afterwards,
nevertheless found them a scandalous idea. Whether real or imagined, the very
idea of the balls reflected the post-Terror generations' morbid fascination
with the horror of the guillotine and the excesses of the French Revolution
with its mass executions.
Those who
attended the orgiastic balls reportedly wore mourning clothes or elaborate
costumes with crepe armbands signifying mourning. Some accounts have both men
and women wearing plain but scanty dress in the wake of the impoverishment of
the Revolution, at least until the return of their fortunes at which time ball
dress became highly elaborate. Others describe women dressing scandalously in
Greco-Roman attire, with their feet bare or adorned only by ribbons. The style
of dress at such a ball was known by some as the "costume à la
victime."Women, and by some accounts men too, wore a red ribbon or string
around their necks at the point of a guillotine blade's impact. Both men and
women attending the balls were said to have worn or cut their hair in a fashion
that bared their necks in a manner reflecting the haircut given the victim by
the executioner, women often using a comb known as a cadenette to achieve this
fashion.[According to some, this was the origin of the feminine hairstyle known
as the "coiffure à la victime" or more popularly the "coiffure à
la Titus", or (in England) "a la guillotine". Some sources state
that a woman sporting this hairstyle sometimes wore a red shawl or throat
ribbon even when not attending a bal des victimes.
In another
macabre touch, instead of a graceful bow or bob of the head to one's dancing
partner, a man who attended a bal des victimes would jerk his head sharply
downwards in imitation of the moment of decapitation. Some sources suggest that
women, too, adopted this salutation.
Fascinating -- as always.
ReplyDelete__ The Devoted Classicist