CLICK TO ENLARGE |
From: https://bespokeunit.com/suits/styles/american/#american
Here’s a
brief hit list of the details that we typically see on American-style suits:
Center vent
3-button
single-breasted stance
Dartless
front
No shoulder
padding
No waist
suppression
Unpleated,
uncuffed, low-slung trousers
It’s well-known negative stereotype that Americans aren’t the best-dressed people in the world. Anyone in any airport in the world can spot the comfort-above-all-else Americans.
American
Suit Vs British Suit
If you take
a British suit, remove its waist suppression, and lower its armholes, you get
an American suit. Further, British suits are almost never made in three-button
single-breasted stances, whereas this is relatively commonplace for American
suits.
American Suit
Vs Italian Suit
Traditional
American suits and the ones you’ll find at the likes of Jos.A Bank and other
such retailers are, in many ways, the polar opposites of Italian or Continental
suits. American suits are known for looseness, lack of shape, and a general
sense of being about a size too big.
Italian
suits, on the other hand, are known for extreme cleanliness, slimness, and lack
of bulk. They can get so slim, in fact, that their wearers can come off, as
Flusser has said, “as walking phallic symbols.”
History Of
The American Suit: Brooks Brothers, J.Press, & Sack Suits
On the
positive stereotype front, America is known for a love of equality. Whether or
not it lives up to that ideal is worthy of debate, but as it relates to suits,
keeping this in mind makes the sack suit make sense, as it was a suit designed
for anyone to wear.
Brooks
Brothers’ “No. 1 Sack Suit” was released in 1901. A child of the Industrial
Revolution, the Sack suit was the first-ever mass-produced tailored garment for
men.
Mass-produced
garments, to be economically viable to the companies making them, need to fit
what we call the “largest common denominator.” In terms of suits, this
translates to a boxy fit with large armholes (a small man can fit into large
armholes, but a large man can’t fit into small ones). The ability to walk into
a retail store and buy tailored clothing that was ready to wear was unheard of
at the time.
It wasn’t
until the 1920’s when Brooks’ invention became popular. Ivy Leaguers (students
at elite Northeastern American universities such as Harvard or Yale) were the
ones to fall in love with the suit and popularize it, wearing it with penny
loafers.
Interestingly,
the sack suit was considered fine for college kids at the time, but
inappropriate for grown men. As college kids became adults, they were expected
to dress with more sophistication. Baggy clothing has typically been the
purview of the young, especially those of us who grew up in the sartorially
dreadful 1990’s. That college kids seventy years prior were wearing baggy
versions of their parents’ clothes serves as proof that the more things change,
the more they stay the same.
After the
Second World War, the sack suit’s popularity amongst middle-aged adults soared.
In large part we can attribute this phenomenon to a common desire of postwar
American men to blend into the background, desiring peace and quiet after years
of violence and war. A suit that retained the wearer’s anonymity through
shapelessness was the perfect uniform for that.
The Sack
suit became the silhouette of choice for American men in the 1950’s. Though
Brooks Brothers barely makes them anymore, J.Press, the last bastion of
American sartorial conservatism, makes nearly all of their tailored clothing in
this silhouette.
Old Brooks Brothers Sack Suit |
From: http://www.guarotti.com/joomla/index.php/homepage-3/fahion-advisor-2/menswear-3
In the
1920s, the target group encompassed a wide target group made of the dominant
and wealthy business class. Companies, like Brooks Brothers for example – who
are considered among the pioneers of the American suit, had to start
reinventing the suit in order to make it suitable for mass production. And we
see these elements loud and clear just by having a quick attentive look at the
American suit.
The
American Suit: The Jacket
The
American jacket also goes by the name of “the sack”. Now, common practice
associates the name to the look of the jacket itself. Which may or may not be
the case, depending on whether you had to jacket custom fitted or just picked
it off the rack.
“The sack”
actually comes from the French “sacque”, which is a particular construction
technique for coats and jackets. The jacket, in fact, is made out of only two
straight fabric panels. A technique that would be perfect for large scale
production of clothes.
The jacket
also comes with almost no padding and a straight silhouette. It is usually
single breasted, with two or three buttons. The canvas features no darts, which
– in case you’re not familiar – are folds in the canvas layer that give it a
more voluminous look.
It also has
a single vent in the back, low armholes and flap pockets. The sleeves wear with
a loose fit and feature three buttons only.
Bookster
Tailoring
Was
established from a background of a deep passion and interest in historic fine
quality, in the main British clothing. But not exclusively. Classic and rare
American leather jackets, Pioneer wear and US styles from the early part of the
last century but with a particular focus and interest from the 20’s to the
60’s. We acquired and traded in some incredible pieces over the years.
Always
knowing that genuine Vintage clothing was a finite resource, and most often
found in quite small sizes led us to make our own and here we are. Being a
relatively small but well established Tailoring House means we have the
flexibility to indulge our long loved interests. We make quality rather than
quantity. One offs for our loyal band of customers that is still growing.
As it is
some of our existing models cross over nicely into Ivy Style, the most obvious
being our made to order top notch Boating Blazers from a vast choice of colours
and patterns. But our other separates such as Trousers and our Sack Suit or
Jacket etc can be tweaked with a large range of detail options, again from a
huge choice of cloths and fabrics.
We are
ready and waiting to welcome new prospective customers to create one of a kind
garments including Sack Suits, Overcoats, Trousers, Blazers ad Jackets in as
good or better quality as the 50’s and 60’s originals.
Below is an
example of our Sack Suit in English Cavalry Twill, inc. a snapshot of the happy
US customer who has a penchant for iconic cloths from here in the UK, a great collaboration.
As a native New Yorker, a preppy and an Ivy League grad ( and "Oxfordian" ) who worked in a Boston law firm and Wall Street investment ( Merchant) bank, I grew up in a family wearing BB, J Press, Triplers, etc. Both suits and the ubiquitous blue BB blazer from first year of school through private ( public) "prep" school. However, My GGF, GF, F and Uncles wore bespoke suits as well as the sacks, although I recall only during work days, the reason being comfort. Twelve plus hours at a desk ( especially when gentlemen did not remove jackets in the office) in a "properly" fitted suit may have lead to its popularity. The comment regarding off- the - rack, RTW sack suits is also relevant. I recall being fitted in BB as a teen which likely took less than 5 minutes. Sleeve, trouser length, perhaps a tuck in the waist, but still baggy. BB was notorious for trousers being shortened to about a half inch above the shoe so that the cuffs( turn ups) would swing while one walked! I had to complain to the "tailor" every time as I watched his chalk marks. You are correct that ( likely in the 60s) the waists were too low so that a belly - however slight-was usually prominent over a low-slung belt. The Sack suit was perfect for big athletic guys and the obese. The 60s brought in the narrow- lapel slim suit to the RTW market ( JFK is an ex., except his were bespoke) But on needed to be slim. things have changed here- Many men just don't wear suits if not "required" which results in horrid clothing. Joseph M Banks? Chinese trash
ReplyDeleteErrata: Joseph " M ' Banks should be Joseph "A", I believe my memory bank sourced "Rosey M Banks " from Mr Wodehouse?
ReplyDeleteThanks Lexington Whitney for your reactions. JEEVES
ReplyDelete