Forget the height difference – here’s why the
stars of The Crown don’t need to look like the real Royals
Elizabeth
Debicki is very tall. Princess Diana was not. It doesn't matter.
Monday,
17th August 2020 at 4:59 pm
https://www.radiotimes.com/news/tv/2020-08-17/the-crown-netflix-casting-resemblance/
After news
broke that Elizabeth Debicki had been cast as The Crown’s next Princess Diana,
the first thing I did was cry “of course!” and send a silent thanks to the
Netflix show’s inspired casting directors. But I must confess, the second thing
I did was go straight to Google and fire off a search for “Elizabeth Debicki
height”, closely followed by “Princess Diana height”.
This
brilliant example of investigative journalism revealed that, at least according
to the search engine, The Night Manager actress Debicki is 6’3″ tall. Princess
Diana was, apparently, 5’10” tall. Now I’m no maths genius, but I reckon that’s
almost half a foot’s height difference. Which is a lot. Also, season four’s
Princess Diana actress Emma Corrin is (unreliably) said to be 5’8″, so that’s
going to be even more of a leap!
I was not
the only person wondering about this. Here’s what happened to Google searches
the moment the news broke:
Height
comparison for the crown
But the
funny thing is, the whole thing came with a sense of déjà vu. We’ve been here
before with The Crown – and we’ve already established something crucial: it
ultimately doesn’t matter whether the person looks exactly like the person
they’re playing or not.
Height-wise,
The Crown set a precedent by starting off with Vanessa Kirby (5’7″) as Princess
Margaret (5’1″); it didn’t matter, because Kirby turned out to be brilliant.
Then, when the cast changed for season three, Margaret shrunk back down
dramatically towards her true height as Helena Bonham Carter (5’2″) took over
the role. This was jarring for all of five minutes before we quickly adjusted
and moved on.
Winston
Churchill was 5’6″, but American actor John Lithgow (6’4″) earned huge critical
acclaim for playing the British Prime Minister. There was some resemblance in
the face, but in his physical build he was clearly much, much taller than the
man he played. And lo – we got over it.
Similarly,
there have already been plenty of comments about Jonathan Pryce – the new Prince
Philip for seasons five and six – and how he doesn’t look like the real-life
person he’ll play. They are correct. But none of that will matter if his
performance is good enough, and The Crown’s casting directors haven’t failed us
yet (even if I was really rooting for them to cast Jeremy Irons in this
particular role).
Sometimes,
of course, a physical feature helps capture the character.
Josh
O’Connor has been pretty sporting about being “reliably informed I have the
ears for the part” to play Prince Charles. The kid actors who played Young
Charles in seasons one and two were also required to have suitably distinctive
ears (no offence intended). It remains to be seen whether the actor who takes
over the role of the heir to the Throne for seasons five and six will have big
ears of his own. (I’m also keen to see how he will measure up, literally, to
Elizabeth Debicki. The real Charles was four inches taller than his first
wife.)
And sure,
the main cast will always be closely scrutinised for a resemblance (or lack
thereof) to the people they play in real life: do Claire Foy and her successor
Olivia Colman look like the Queen? Do Matt Smith and Tobias Menzies look like
Prince Philip? How about the actors playing Anne, or Camilla Parker-Bowles, or
Margaret Thatcher? Some of them do, some of them don’t.
The Crown
Olivia Colman and Claire Foy
But then
again, many of the real-life people featured in The Crown are known more by
name, and less by face – or not widely known to the public at all. How many of
us have a picture in our mind’s eye of Lord Mountbatten, so ably played on
screen by Charles Dance? Or Peter Townsend (Ben Miles)? Or Tommy Lascelles (Pip
Torrens)? Can many people in the year 2020 remember the face of King George VI
– and does it matter that Jared Harris hardly looks like him at all?
Perhaps the
scrutiny will increase as The Crown moves relentlessly towards the present and
we’re able to do a more direct comparison with what the Royals look like today
and the pictures we see of them in the newspapers. In seasons five and six, the
new Queen (Imelda Staunton) and Margaret (Lesley Manville) and Philip (Jonathan
Pryce) will take us through some events from very recent memory, and it’s
possible that the juxtaposition with the real-life royal family will get
weirder as we get closer to the present day.
But from
the very beginning, The Crown has cast more for talent and less for physical
resemblance – and it has worked. That takes a certain confidence, especially
when you’ve made the decision to swap out the entire cast every two seasons and
replace them with actors who a) don’t have to look exactly like the person they
play, and b) don’t even have to look like the actor who previously played the
same role. It’s bold.
So bring on
Elizabeth Debicki and bring on Jonathan Pryce and Imelda Staunton and Lesley
Manville and more. This isn’t a documentary; it’s a drama – and The Crown’s
casting team knows exactly what it’s doing.
No comments:
Post a Comment