Our Zoo review – it's hard not to like this
sentimental, animal-happy drama
It's a period drama full of familiar characters, but I
found myself rooting for George's idealism, scoffing at his cynical mother and
hoping they wouldn't shoot the monkey
Rebecca
Nicholson
Thu 4 Sep
2014 06.00 BSTFirst published on Thu 4 Sep 2014 06.00 BST
https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2014/sep/04/our-zoo-review-sentimental-animal-happy-drama
Our Zoo
(BBC1) arrived with an air of early Sunday evenings: a new six-part drama on
BBC1, set in 1930, about George Mottershead, a plucky man who loves animals and
adventure, and so decides to set up a zoo. Will he triumph, against the odds?
Well, yes, because it's "based on a true story", and – spoiler alert!
– that zoo became Chester zoo, which is currently open and thriving, and
offering visitors a truly "ANIMAZING day out".
The
televised story of its genesis is a bit grimey, like Call the Midwife, and it's
northern, like The Village and The Mill, in the sense that its actors settle on
accents located in a generic North, somewhere between Durham, Leeds and
Manchester. It's got posh people and it's got poor people, like Downton Abbey.
It's shot with the same sepia-ish hue that afflicts photographs on the covers
of heartstring-tugging airport novels with titles like Please Daddy Come Home.
It's Sunday telly through-and-through, and yet here it is, piggybacking on the
Great British Bake Off in the middle of the week, slightly out of step with its
competitors (on Wednesday, Grand Designs and a documentary about the dark web).
I wonder why it's here in this slot; I can't work out if it's being given a leg
up, or has been put out to pasture already.
It's a
shame if it's the latter, because Our Zoo is better than it sounds. Lee
Ingleby, an actor with a contrary knack for bringing out watery-eyed steeliness
in his roles (Inspector George Gently, The Street), plays Mottershead with
kindness; his character is a fundamentally decent man, prone to PTSD following
a near-catastrophic injury in the war. Early scenes in which his
"shellshock" is triggered by a shootin' cowboy at the local circus
hint that there is more depth than the show's initial cutesiness suggests.
Mottershead leans against the gate of his backyard, stricken and weeping, as
his baffled daughters run into the house, afraid. Although we had only just met
these people, it was a surprisingly desolate and moving moment.
Then the
animals appeared. Mottershead brings home a parrot and a monkey from the docks,
because the dockmaster is about to chloroform the tiny simian into next week.
He sets up a prototype zoo in the outside loo in the backyard, and sticks a
bucket behind a curtain to accommodate the family's privy-based needs. On
reflection, he decides he should sell the monkey to the circus, but the
ringmaster suggests that an old camel may need to be put down, so instead,
Mottershead brings the camel home to his little terraced house to join his
nascent menagerie. He's possessed of a spontaneity that in real life would
warrant immediate divorce, yet in the context of this programme, it is adorable
and quirky and noble.
Anne Reid,
as his long-suffering mother, is the only voice of dissent. She's set up as a
cranky working-class version of the Dowager Countess, and says things like
"Elephants? Yer off yer rocker!". But as the son has essentially
ruined the family business by sticking a camel in the backyard, and then forced
them to sell up to move to a crumbling house in an unwelcoming village, it's
quite clear that she's the only one talking sense. To be sensible lacks heart,
however, and Our Zoo has bucketloads of that.
"I
can't make a decision based on sentiment," a stern bank manager tells
Mottershead, as he applies for his loan to buy a crumbling mansion (naturally,
he is turned down, then makes a rousing speech about bringing beauty into the
world, causing the financier to do an about-turn so reckless he could have been
a banker today). I felt his dilemma. Ostensibly, this is drama by the book. I
have seen the sulky, runaway teenage daughter before. I've seen the
aristocratic neighbour whose well-spoken charms set the action in motion. I've
seen the weary yet loving wife, the quiet, supportive father, the caddish
brother-in-law, the kindly vicar, the unfriendly new neighbours. Yet despite
being well aware that I was manipulated at every turn, I made a decision based
on sentiment, and found myself rooting for George's idealism, and scoffing at
his cynical mother, and hoping they wouldn't shoot the monkey, even though he'd
– gasp! – stolen some eggs. It wasn't quite animazing, and it wasn't quite
mid-week, either, but it was almost shamefully watchable.
No comments:
Post a Comment