Princess Pushy: The Fabulous Life of Princess Michael of Kent.
By Elizabeth Kerri Mahon / http://scandalouswoman.blogspot.nl/2008/08/princess-pushy-fabulous-life-of.html
She's tall, blonde and striking, married to a handsome prince, a member of The Royal Family. She's also haughty, gaffe (she once complained "The English distrust foreigners, they think the wogs begin at Calais") prone, and been linked to other men. Princess Anne dubbed her 'Princess Pushy' and the Queen once remarked mischievously to her husband's uncle, Lord Mountbatten 'that she sounds a bit grand to us.' Also known amongst the Royal Family as "Our Val" for Valkryie, Princess Margaret's son was said when asked what he would wish on his worst enemy, 'Dinner with Princess Michael of Kent.' The media have dubbed her the "Rent-a-Kents," for their habit of turning up at the opening of an envelope.
Who is this woman that has provoked such a sharp reaction in both the establishment and the media? How did the wife of a minor royal become such a lighting rod for bad behavior in a family where Prince Charles's youngest son once wore the uniform of a Nazi to a costume party (apparently he had no idea why that was such a no-no. And they say that Americans no nothing about history!), and the Duchess of York was caught getting her toes sucked by her financial advisor?
They married in June 30, 1978 in a civil ceremony in Vienna. Prince Michael had to give up his place in the succession since due to the Act of Succession of 1701 (at the time he was 15th in line for the throne), as no member of the Royal family can marry a Catholic and keep their place in the line of succession (their children Lord Frederick and Lady Gabriella were raised Anglican, and thus are still in the line of succession, although way down on the list, 31 and 32 respectively). Princess Michael has been quite vocal about how in the dark ages the attitude is, "They can marry a Moonie, A Seven-Day Adventist, a Scientologist, A Muslim. " (Okay, I have to agree with her on this one. If the heir to the throne can marry a divorcee that he had a thirty year affair with, I think they can bend and get rid of that Roman Catholic clause.)
Since then, Princess Michael has put her court shoes in her mouth more often than not. She attributes it to the fact that at 6ft tall in her stocking feet, she's hard to miss. Others put it down to her sense of entitlement. One of the first blows was the revelation that Princess Michael of Kent's father had not only been a member of the Nazi party but had also been in the SS, where he held the rank of Sturmbannfuhrer or "Assault Unit Leader" during the Second World War, although she produced papers that proved that he had actually been expelled from the party in 1944 (one wonders what he did to get the Nazi's to kick him out!)
Then there were the charges of plagiarism on her first two books Crowned in a Far Country, and Cupid and the King, which Princess Michael claims wasn't her fault but the fault of one of her researchers who didn't properly right down where the offending passages came from. In another interview, she allegedly claimed that she had more royal blood in her vieins than any person to marry into the royal family since Prince Philip. She's also a cat lover, in a family that adores dogs, particularly corgis. When she once complained about a cat being mauled by a corgi, she was promptly put in her place.
Controversies. ( Wikipedia)
The media claim she
once declared to an American fashion magazine that she had "more royal
blood in her veins than any person to marry into the royal family since Prince
Philip". She is also reported to have said she was "probably the first
tall person to marry into the clan" (also true if males are discounted;
Princess Michael stands about six feet (1.83 m ) tall). The Queen reportedly has
referred to her as "Our Val", a reference to the warrior-like
Valkyries, and – sarcastically – as "a bit too grand for" the rest of
the royal family.
In May 2004 she was in the news when a group of black diners
in a New York restaurant alleged that the Princess had told them to "get
back to the colonies" when complaining about their noise – an accusation
she denied, though it made headlines around the world. Her account of the story
was that she remarked to one of her fellow dinner guests that she would be glad
to go back to the colonies in order to escape her noisy neighbours. She later
described her accusers as a "group of rappers". This was untrue; the
group consisted of an investment banker, a music mogul, a reporter, a
television fashion correspondent, and a lawyer.
In February 2005 she gave a series of interviews to promote
her book, in one of which she claimed that Britons should be more concerned
about the bloodlines of their children, and claimed that the British media were
"excited" by Prince Harry's decision to wear a swastika for a fancy
dress party because "of the ownership structure" of the British
press. She claimed that the press would not have been so concerned had he worn
a hammer and sickle, which "stands for Stalin and gulag and pogrom and
devastation".
In September 2005, she appeared in the news again, after the
News of the World reporter Mazher Mahmood apparently gained her confidence and
claimed that she made a number of intemperate remarks, including calling Diana,
Princess of Wales, "bitter" and "nasty".
On hearing that the research of Dorothy Cheney and Robert
Seyfarth seems to indicate that rank among female baboons is hereditary, the
Princess said, "I always knew that when people who aren’t like us claim
that hereditary rank is not part of human nature, they must be wrong. Now
you’ve given me evolutionary proof!"
Mikhail Kravchenko, Russian tycoon friend of Princess Michael of Kent, shot dead in Moscow
A long-standing friend of Princess Michael of Kent was found
shot dead in a Moscow suburb yesterday morning.
By John-Paul Ford Rojas8:20AM BST 21 May 2012 / http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/russia/9278889/Mikhail-Kravchenko-Russian-tycoon-friend-of-Princess-Michael-of-Kent-shot-dead-in-Moscow.html
The royal was said to be "very distressed" last
night after the Russian tycoon Mikhail Kravchenko was found in a pool of blood
beside his Mercedes in an apparent contract killing.
Police said the killing appeared to be carried out by two
professional gunmen who knew his whereabouts.
The 46–year–old furniture company tycoon was said to have
been driving at around 2am just yards from a home in the suburb of Peredelkino
that he had built for his parents, when he was overtaken and the road blocked.
He was then shot five times in the body before being dragged
from his car and shot in the head. There was speculation over whether his death
may have been linked to a business dispute.
A source reportedly said: "We cannot rule out the
common scenario for such shootings – a debt he couldn't repay or a dispute over
the ownership of a company or property."
Simon Astaire, a spokesman for the Kents, told a newspaper:
"Prince and Princess Michael of Kent are very distressed to hear of this
tragedy."
Mr Kravchencko was pictured holding hands with the princess,
67, during a holiday in Venice six years ago. The princess spoke about their
relationship in an interview with Hello! magazine.
She said: "The true nature of our relationship is that
it is a very good friendship. I hold hands with all my friends. I don't think
that's being intimate at all. I'm a very tactile person – I do it all the
time."
Mr Kravchenko also denied claims of an affair, saying:
"We (the princess and I) have just normal human relations. We are friends."
Support: Russian exile Boris Berezovsky said there was
nothing underhand in the money he had given.
So why did a controversial Russian oligarch give Queen's
cousin Prince Michael £320,000 through offshore companies?
The 56 payments, worth between £5,000 and £15,000, were made
between 2002 and 2008
Money channeled through a private firm run by Prince
Michael's Old Etonian private secretary
By SAM GREENHILL
PUBLISHED: 11:10 GMT, 13 May 2012 | UPDATED: 09:07 GMT, 14
May 2012 / http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2143711/Queens-cousin-given-320-000-controversial-Russian-oligarch-pay-grace-favour-flat-upkeep.html
The Queen’s cousin Prince Michael of Kent has been secretly
receiving hundreds of thousands of pounds from Russian oligarch Boris
Berezovsky.
Dozens of payments worth at least £320,000 from the exiled
tycoon were channelled through offshore
companies.
Prince Michael is already known for accepting charity from
the Queen who started paying the rent at Kensington Palace when MPs wanted to
evict him and Princess Michael of Kent.
But now the royal, dubbed the ‘pauper prince’, faces
questions about whether he has offered anything in return for the billionaire
Russian’s money.
His spokesman yesterday said ‘absolutely not’, adding: ‘Mr
Berezovsky has known the prince since the early 1990s and has a high regard for
the prince’s work. He therefore chose to be supportive over a period which
ended some years ago.’
A friend of the oligarch suggested he simply wanted to be a
part of high society, and his friendship with Prince Michael gave him coveted
access.
Mr Berezovsky was a key figure in the Kremlin before falling
out with Vladimir Putin and seeking asylum in Britain 12 years ago. He became
friends with Prince Michael – a distant cousin of the last tsar, Nicholas II –
and the pair have frequently dined together at Kensington Palace.
High Court papers reveal that a fund controlled by the
Russian made 56 payments worth between £5,000 and £15,000 to a company run by
Prince Michael’s private secretary.
The money was paid every two to three weeks between 2002 and
2008.
Mr Berezovsky told The Sunday Times: ‘There is nothing
underhand or improper about the financial assistance I have given Prince
Michael. It is a matter between friends.’
Yesterday sources close to the prince said the money was
used to pay for ‘his staff, his office and his private secretary’.
Although a member of the Royal Family, Prince Michael does
not receive money from the public purse, and his money worries have been
previously well publicised.
His wife – nicknamed ‘Princess Pushy’ by the rest of the
Royal Family – once said she would ‘go anywhere for a hot meal’. In 2000, two
years before the first payment from Mr Berezovsky, the prince’s consultancy
firm Cantium Services was reported to have had debts of £200,000.
The financial support from Mr Berezovsky went to Bulmer
Investments, a private firm run by private secretary Nicholas Chance, an Old
Etonian. The oligarch made his fortune during the Russian state privatisation
programme in the 1990s.
A Moscow court convicted him in
Simon Astaire, the prince’s spokesman, said the royal was
‘absolutely not’ giving anything in return for the money, which he claimed
funded ‘cultural and charitable activities’.
He said: ‘The way this arrangement was processed is a
private matter, but suffice to say that it was conducted properly and, for
example, all appropriate tax was paid.’
The first payment to the prince in 2002 coincided with
criticism from an MPs committee about the £69 a week rent the prince paid for
his Kensington Palace home. The Queen later stepped in with a personal subsidy
of £100,000 a year to pay a market rent.
Prince and Princess Michael had to sell their eight bedroom
mansion in Gloucestershire in 2006 for £5.75million to cut their costs. They
have faced claims they used their titles to get free trips and boost their
income, earning them the nickname ‘Rent-a-Kents’. In 2010 it emerged taxpayers
were footing a £250,000-a-year bill for armed police protection for the royal
couple, even though they carry out no official duties.
Prince Michael is allowed to take up to three officers with
him on his numerous business trips to foreign destinations such as Moscow and
China. Princess Michael has long had expensive tastes, and spends a fortune on
fine antiques and paintings. She also found herself exposed by a reporter from
the now-defunct News of the World as being available at around £25,000 for
appearances such as opening a shopping centre in Dubai.
Details of the payments by Mr Berezovsky come ahead of a
case in which the Russian is suing the family of a former partner in a £2billion battle. He is pursuing
the widow of Badri Patarkatsishvili, a Georgian tycoon who died in 2008.
The case follows Mr Berezovsky’s high profile £3.5billion
legal action against fellow Russian Roman Abramovich. Judgment in his case
against the Chelsea FC owner has yet to be handed down.
|
Princess Michael 'told black diners to go back to colonies'
By Marcus Warren in New York12:05AM BST 27 May 2004/
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/1462995/Princess-Michael-told-black-diners-to-go-back-to-colonies.html
Princess Michael of
Kent was accused last night of insulting a party of black diners at a smart New
York restaurant with a racist slur, allegedly telling them to "go back to
the colonies".
The reported outburst made the controversial member of the
Royal Family a hate figure in the city, where she was depicted as a jumped-up
aristocrat offending American ideals of equality and racial harmony.
"Royal Bigot", screamed a tabloid, describing the
incident as "Pushy Princess Rage" and labelling her the House of
Windsor's "equivalent to trailer trash".
Her spokesman denied that she made the remarks but not
before they had passed into local lore.
"She needs help," said Merv Matheson, a Wall
Street banker who claimed to have felt the whiplash of the princess's tongue.
"She has a problem and that problem is racism."
Another member of the group, AJ Callaway, a television
reporter, said he had no idea who the woman arguing with them was. "I
thought she was just a crazy woman. I still think she's a crazy woman," he
said.
The row centred on the princess's confrontation with a group
of five black guests at an adjoining table at Da Silvano, where she was with
two friends on Monday evening.
She is alleged to have said "Enough already!" and
slammed her palm down on their table, apparently disturbed by their behaviour.
"You need to quiet down."
The restaurant's owner, Silvano Marchetto, offered to move
the princess's party to a separate room. But before she switched tables she is
alleged to have leant over to the group, supposedly pumping her fist, and said:
"You need to go back to the colonies."
"That she would make a comment like that. I was
fuming," said Nicole Young, a PR consultant, one of the targets of the
alleged snub.
Miss Young later demanded an explanation. The princess is
supposed to have replied: "I did not say 'back to the colonies', I said
you 'should remember the colonies'. Back in the days of the colonies there were
rules that were very good."
"You think about it," she reportedly told Miss
Young. "Just think about it."
According to the princess's spokesman, Simon Astaire, the
clash was provoked by the loud behaviour and swearing of the table of five.
Born of German nobility, Princess Michael once famously
accused the British of being racist. "I will never become British even if
I live here the rest of my life," she said during an interview in the
mid-1980s. "The English distrust foreigners."
If she hoped that her latest alleged remarks would pass
unnoticed, she picked the wrong restaurant. A New York institution, Da Silvano
is a favourite haunt of such grandes dames as Anna Wintour, the editor of US
Vogue, and Nicole Kidman.
Celebrities are scattered through the room at lunch and
dinner, sampling a Tuscan menu that yesterday included delicacies such as
carre' di renna (rack of elk) and anatra muta (vertically roasted duck).
Mr Marchetto, whose restaurant celebrates its 30th birthday
next year, later apologised to the black diners for the princess's behaviour.
"The phrase was trying to be funny but it wasn't so
funny, maybe," he said. "If someone told me to go back to Italy, I
would be offended, too."
No comments:
Post a Comment