Review
Spare by Prince Harry review – dry your eyes,
mate
For all he may have suffered, and despite his clear
love for his wife, the Duke of Sussex’s misfiring memoir is not only tone-deaf
to his privilege but at times downright bizarre
Rachel
Cooke
@msrachelcooke
Sun 15 Jan
2023 07.00 GMT
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/jan/15/spare-by-prince-harry-review-dry-your-eyes-mate
It’s now
almost a week since Prince Harry’s memoir Spare was published and what
thrillingly hectic days they’ve been: hard to pick a highlight. Amusing as it
was to find Nicholas Witchell reporting for the BBC on the book’s release by
filming the sole person queueing outside Waterstones’ London flagship to buy
it, I think the sound of the ex-Sun hack Dan Wootton railing flatulently in the
Daily Mail at Harry’s description of him as a “sad little man” just edged it
for me (“no, YOU’RE the sad little man, Mister Prince!”). Meanwhile, in the US,
Harry went on The Late Show With Stephen Colbert, where he performed a skit
with some trumpets and Tom Hanks and spoke of his “frost-nipped todger” – said
todger being, by the way, just one of dozens of be-nicknamed rude mechanicals who
appear in his masterwork (others include his mates Badger, Skippy and Chimp;
the venomous royal courtiers known as the Bee, the Wasp and the Fly; and
Rehabber Kooks, AKA Rebekah Brooks, chief executive of Rupert Murdoch’s News
UK).
It has to
be said, however, that none of this coverage, barmy and excessively fixated, is
even half so unlikely as Spare itself, a book that must rank as one of the most
bizarre I’ve ever read. Yes, it is – at moments – very sad. There’s ongoing
shame in it for tabloid journalism. But for a title written explicitly in the
cause of securing sympathy and understanding for its so-called author, boy,
does it misfire. It’s not only that Harry is so petulant: a man who thinks
nothing, even now, of complaining about the bedroom he was allotted for his
summer hols in Granny’s castle. With every page, his California makeover grows
less convincing.
Where, for
instance, did he leave his newfound feminism when he came to describe Pat, a
matron at his prep school who was slightly disabled? (“Pat wasn’t hot,” he
says. “Pat was cold.”) Does he really expect us to believe that, into his 20s,
he didn’t know the word “Paki” was offensive? Since a certain fateful day when
he and Meghan had a row while roasting a chicken and she threatened to dump
him, he has had, he tells us, an awful lot of therapy and yet it seems to have
done him no more good than the Elizabeth Arden cream he once applied to his
tingling thing post-north pole. What kind of person insists on an air-clearing
meeting with their father on the day of his father’s funeral? A myopic,
self-obsessed, non-empathic kind of person, I would say. Exactly the same kind
of person, in fact, who would talk about reconciliation in the same breath as
they publicly slag off their family.
‘He literally peed his pants in the hours before their
first date’: the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.
Such things
are made all the more jarring by the yawning gap between the way Harry speaks
and the way his ghost, JR Moehringer, writes. In the revelation stakes,
Moehringer has done his job; when Harry thanks him in his acknowledgments for
having spoken with “such deep conviction about the beauty (and sacred
obligation) of Memoir”, you can only wonder what manner of mesmerism he
deployed (“Look into my eyes, Harry, and tell me how many Taliban you
killed…”). But in the prose stakes, Moehringer just can’t help himself.
Gratitude is not something with which Harry seems to
be much acquainted
I suppose
he wishes he were Ben Lerner, or some other hip young literary American
gunslinger, rather than having to channel a raging Sloane who must look up the
word compere in a dictionary when his brother asks him to be one at his wedding
and whose epigraph from Faulkner – “The past is never dead. It’s not even past”
– he found on brainyquote.com. Sometimes, Moehringer writes. Like this. In
short sentences. Bang. Bang-bang. At other times, it’s as if he’s been at
Harry’s weed or something. At one point, the prince talks about tuck at school,
specifically his love of Starburst, formerly known as Opal Fruits. “I devised a
way of super-sizing my sugar rush,” the passage reads. “I’d take all my Opal
Fruits and squeeze them together into one massive gobstopper… As the wad melted,
my bloodstream would become a frothy cataract of dextrose. Whatsoever thy hand
findest to do, do it with thy might.” And lo, Billy Bunter morphs into Renton
out of Trainspotting.
Harry’s
meaner critics like to point out that plenty of people lose someone as a child;
his self-proclaimed exceptionalism annoys them. This is, of course,
disingenuous as well as harsh. No other boy ever had to walk behind his
mother’s coffin in full sight of millions, nor have many been trailed by those
they believe killed their parent into grief-struck adulthood. In his book,
however, Harry’s special pleading extends far beyond all this. Is it a
manifestation of his extreme privilege that he seems not to realise that most
British people struggle with the expression of feelings; that the desire to run
a mile at the thought of “talking it out” isn’t limited to those with titles?
Love need
not always be showy, whatever he thinks now he lives in the land of Meghan and
her gruesome love poems (the one he quotes is unbearable: pure vomit emoji).
His description of his father’s failure to hug him after he has told him his
mother is dead is piercing – a scene out of a historical novel – but
thereafter, Charles sounds so quietly doting: leaving encouraging notes on his
pillow, tickling his face until he falls asleep (his “darling boy” was afraid
of the dark). Gratitude is not something with which Harry seems to be much
acquainted and perhaps this is why his Aunt Margaret once gave him a Biro for
Christmas and his stepmother, Camilla, once suggested a little job in Bermuda
might be nice.
Does he at
last spell out his reasons for leaving Britain? Not really. There are loads of
vague accusations. “You know why [I left]!” he yelps at William, in the royal
burial ground at Frogmore, their feet almost “on top of Wallis’s grave”. But
nothing concrete emerges, unless you think a misreported row over a
bridesmaid’s dress is a reason to “flee” a country. Was it down to Meghan,
then? Who knows. All I can tell you is that this manchild who once wanted
nothing more than to work in an alpine fondue hut is patently obsessed with his
wife. (Long story, but he literally peed his pants in the hours before their
first date.)
How
impressive she is, talking of women’s rights and something called Eat, Pray,
Love! Packing only jeans, shorts and a yoga mat for Botswana! He will give her
anything, even a California house with a pond full of koi, though to do so he
would prefer not to have to spend even “some” of his inheritance from his
mother. So here we are. Penguin Random House has helped him out and we can only
hope he’s happy with his end of the deal, a pact more Faustian by far than
anything his father or brother have ever signed.
Spare by Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex is
published by Bantam (£28). To support the Guardian and Observer order your copy
at guardianbookshop.com. Delivery charges may apply
No comments:
Post a Comment