Why does the Harry and Meghan psychodrama
continue? Because no one really wants it to end
Marina Hyde
They say they’re seeking a new life but the Sussexes
seem obsessed with their old one, and people enraged by them can talk about
little else
‘The Sussexes really only have one story to tell –
admittedly, it’s a dramatic and sensational one.’
Tue 13 Dec 2022
12.32 GMT
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/dec/13/harry-meghan-psychodrama-continues-netflix
Of all the
charges laid at the door of Harry and Meghan, we can reasonably discount the
idea that being paid by Netflix is the sin to end all sins. I’m not sure how
people think the British royal family have historically accrued their vast
wealth, but a contract with a streaming giant is right down the list of
money-spinning horrors.
Let’s face
it, there are a lot worse ways to lay your hands on a reported £88m in today’s
money. No one dissolved the monasteries, here. No one ran a foreign country as
an extraction colony. Looting-wise, no one did much beyond taking a call from
telly warlord Ted Sarandos and thinking: yes please. This is the market value
of my truth.
Anyway, on
with the show. Again. I can’t help feeling the Sussexes increasingly come
across as a pair of ancient mariners with a TV contract, condemned to tell
their tale to everyone they meet. After this latest exhaustive (and fairly
exhausting) six-parter, many will now feel they have seen enough of the
albatross in question, which has been hung around the neck either of the
Sussexes or the news media, depending on to whom you speak. Both sides of this
forever war seem locked in an endless cycle of tale-telling, which will
ultimately have to be moved on from. Or not, if it keeps being lucrative for
both sides (of which more shortly).
Despite the
work that has gone into crafting the impression of a further banquet of
revelations, the Sussexes really only have one story to tell. Admittedly, it’s
a dramatic and sensational one that has sold countless books and papers and
driven online traffic and TV ratings around the world. They told it to Oprah
last year, and now they are telling it again to Netflix viewers.
In some
ways, there’s nothing wrong with telling the same story over and over again.
John Grisham does it, though he is at least able to change the names and
locations. The most successful movie stars have always repeatedly played some
lightly adjusted version of their persona, on the timeworn and financially
proven principle of giving the public what it wants. That’s showbiz.
‘As for the consumers of the endless psychodrama,
there is little so enduring as the public’s unwillingness to see their part in
all of this.’
The
question with Meghan and Harry is how long it can go on after this latest
rather repetitive instalment – or, indeed, how long anyone focused on new
horizons really wishes to be trapped in this same old cycle. The cycle is
certainly of the vicious variety. The Sussexes publicly say something; the
papers pounce on it and make merry hell with it for days or weeks; some
drama-queen palace courtier makes a disparaging off-the-record comment; a new
grievance is thereby minted on which the Sussexes will soon publicly say
something. Repeat cycle.
But is this
just going to be it, for ever? The returns look likely to be diminishing. It
will – surely? – eventually become incredibly boring. Indeed, for many, it
already has, with even some sympathisers now judging that things could be a lot
worse. Then again, I’m not sure they have the cost of living crisis in
Montecito.
Despite it
being a cliche, I do think one of the soundest pieces of advice is that the
best revenge is a good life. However, the more classic form of revenge, which
the Sussexes are pursuing, is much more lucrative. For all their talk of
escape, they are still locked in a destructively symbiotic relationship with
their detractors. “You shut up!” “No, YOU shut up!”
Crucially,
though, their detractors also have a choice, which is to leave the entire thing
alone. We do, after all, know this story now, and pretending that unignorable
news is being made is just something you tell yourself as a fig leaf to keep
running it all, at remorseless length, because it sells papers and drives
traffic and engagement. But hey – everyone’s on the take.
As for the
consumers of the endless psychodrama, there is little so enduring as the
public’s unwillingness to see its part in all of this. A few years ago, Prince
William and his brother participated in a documentary about their mother, in
which they recalled the scenes in the wake of Princess Diana’s death, when the
children were famously forced out in public to view tributes and observe the
crowds. “People wanted to grab us, touch us,” remembered William. “They were
shouting, wailing, literally wailing at us, throwing flowers, and yelling,
sobbing, breaking down – people fainted and collapsed. It was a very alien
environment.”
Alien is a
kind way of putting it. Those people behaved weirdly and appallingly, yet would
never dream of recognising their behaviour as such. Many of them are the same
people now howling about the Sussexes, the same people who absolutely hoovered
up the intrusive coverage of Diana, the same people who then pretended to be
disgusted by it all after she died. The same people who demanded the late Queen
leave off comforting her young grandsons at Balmoral, despite the fact they’d
lost their mother, and come back to London to … what? Comfort them? Grow up.
But then a
lot of people love all this stuff, whether or not they care to admit it. They
love the drama, love to take it personally, love to get angry about it, love to
act as if they know the family, love to paw bereaved children, love to comment,
love the whole endless shooting match. Don’t get me wrong – I too am a grateful
beneficiary, given I’ve just got another column out of it. But it all cuts both
ways. A disapproving and enraged market is still a market. Whatever you think
of Meghan and Harry and their truth, it’s difficult not to judge that much of
the British public has a long, long way to go before it faces up to its own.
Marina Hyde is a Guardian columnist
No comments:
Post a Comment