Sunday, 19 September 2021

King has to keep Het Loo nature reserve open all year or lose subsidy / King closes part of Kroondomein Het Loo again on Wednesday

 


WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2021 - 08:38

King has to keep Het Loo nature reserve open all year or lose subsidy

https://nltimes.nl/2021/09/08/king-keep-het-loo-nature-reserve-open-year-lose-subsidy?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook

 

King Willem-Alexander must keep Kroondomein Het Loo open all year if he wants to keep getting the 4.7 million euros subsidy for the maintenance of the nature reserve, Minister Carola Schouten of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality said in a letter that will soon be sent to parliament, sources told NOS.

 

The nature reserve is closed every year From September 15 to December 25. It is suspected that the royal family uses that time to go hunting in the park, according to the broadcaster.

 

For years there has been opposition from nature and animal welfare organizations, local residents, and political parties to the annual closure of the nature reserve. The annoyance increased when it turned out that the King receives a subsidy of 4.7 million euros for the maintenance of the nature reserve.

 

If the King receives subsidy, he must adhere to the subsidy rules, opponents said. The conditions of this subsidy state that nature reserves must be open for 358 days a year - so can only be closed for one week a year.

 

From 2022, the same subsidy rules will apply to King Willem-Alexander as to other nature reserve subsidy recipients, Schouten said in her letter, according to the broadcaster's sources. 



King loses multimillion-dollar subsidy for Kroondomein Het Loo if he continues to close off the area

 

In order to maintain the multimillion-dollar subsidy for the Crown Domain, King Willem-Alexander must open the nature reserve on the Veluwe 358 days a year. Agriculture Minister Carola Schouten has removed the shadowy exception rules from the subsidy scheme for the coming years.

 

Niek Megens 8 Sep. 2021 Last update: 08-09-21, 12:19

https://www.destentor.nl/apeldoorn/koning-verliest-miljoenensubsidie-voor-kroondomein-het-loo-als-hij-gebied-blijft-afsluiten~a33897ca/?referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F

 

The minister reports this today in a letter to the House of Representatives. So far, the king has been allowed to lock down the subsidised Crown Domain during the hunting season in order to be able to hunt the Veluwe undisturbed in the autumn.

 

Campaigners have been objecting to this for years, supported by the Party for the Animals in the House of Representatives. Lawyers have also strongly criticised this. They claim that the king makes improper use of the 4.7 million in subsidy for nature management that the Crown Domain has received over the past five years.

 

Exception

Anyone who wishes to claim this subsidy scheme must open the nature reserve in question to the public 358 days a year. In addition, the applicant may close a maximum of one hectare for private use. That did not happen, because for the royal family, however, the Ministry of Agriculture made an exception in 2016. The king was allowed to close off 7200 hectares of the area from mid-September to mid-December while retaining the multimillion-dollar subsidy.

 

Only last spring, the minister insisted that 'protection of the privacy' of the king was the reason for this. Earlier, Schouten gave as a reason that closure of the Crown Domain was necessary to preserve the 'unique character of the area'. According to the minister, the periodic closure was 'essential for the balance between wood production, the presence of ungulates and recreation'.

 

The Crown Domain is a gift from Wilhelmina to the people and must therefore always be accessible

 

Frank Wassenberg, Party for the Animals

In the new subsidy scheme for the period 2022-2027, none of this is the case anymore. The Ministry of Agriculture will follow the subsidy regulation of the province of Gelderland for the coming years. 'By applying for the subsidy, the applicant undertakes to open the eligible sites for 358 days from dawn to sunset', the minister writes to the Chamber. 'Exceptions to this are fully in line with the conditions of the Gelderland scheme.'

 

Conditions

Mp Frank Wassenberg (PvdD) is surprised by Schouten's letter but calls it 'great news'. "If the king wants a subsidy, he simply has to meet the conditions. That's obvious.'' Should Willem-Alexander waive the subsidy, the Crown Domain will still have to remain open throughout the year, says Wassenberg. He rejects a motion to that effect from his party that was passed by the House of Representatives in 2018. "The Crown Domain is a gift from Wilhelmina to the people and must therefore always be accessible. Subsidy or no subsidy.''

 

'Hunting decisive'

Last spring, at the request of the House of Representatives, Minister Schouten released the underlying documents from this file. It could be concluded from this that the exceptional position for the Crown Domain was forced under pressure from the official and political top. Wassenberg deduced from this that this was not the privacy of the king but the hunt that was decisive.



King closes part of Kroondomein Het Loo again on Wednesday

 

King Willem-Alexander will close part of the Kroondomein Het Loo to the public again next week for three months. This is confirmed by the Government Information Service after reporting by RTL Nieuws.

 

9-9-2021

https://nos.nl/artikel/2397168-koning-sluit-deel-kroondomein-het-loo-woensdag-opnieuw-af

 

Yesterday it was announced that the nature reserve may not be closed from 2022, if the king wants to keep a five-yearly subsidy of 4.7 million euros for maintenance. From then on, the same rules apply to the head of state as to other subsidy applicants for nature reserves. This means that the park may only be closed for one week a year.

 

The Crown Domain can still be closed this year, because the new rules will not take effect until 1 January 2022. The king is therefore not anticipating the new situation, despite the criticism of nature organizations and from politics.

 

Almost all parties in the House of Representatives demanded clarification about the closure last year. Prime Minister Rutte stressed at the time that the forest is private and that the king, as a large landowner, is free to do whatever he wants with the area.

 

New grant application

If the king decides to foreke a new subsidy application, the nature reserve may be closed to the public for months. The Government Information Service does not yet want to say whether the king will refrain from such a new multimillion-dollar subsidy. Applications can still be submitted until the end of the year.

 

The park on the Veluwe is closed annually from 15 September to 25 December. It is suspected that the royal family will then hunt game.

 

Crown domain closed again for three months to 'privacy' king

 

Landgoed Kroondomein Het Loo will close for another three months in the autumn, despite the protracted discussion about that annual closure. According to outgoing Minister schouten of Agriculture, the closure of the nature park has to do with the protection of the "privacy"  of King Willem-Alexander. She answers this to the House of Representatives to questions from D66 and the Party for the Animals (PvdD).

 

FRI 23 APRIL, 00:57

https://nos.nl/artikel/2377844-kroondomein-opnieuw-drie-maanden-dicht-om-persoonlijke-levenssfeer-koning

 

Those parties wanted to know exactly what the king's access to the nature park on the Veluwe is. For years there has been discussion about the fact that a large part of the park is closed to the public from September 15 to December 25, while the king receives government money to keep the park in order.

 

Fences

The great-grandmother of King Willem-Alexander, Wilhelmina, gave the Crown Domain to the State in 1959. The king does have the usufruct, that is, he can use it. However, he will receive a subsidy from the government for the maintenance, about 4.7 million euros.

 

For other grant recipients, they must open a site to the public at least 358 days a year. The king is therefore not allowed to simply close the gates, according to D66, the PvdD and also the Faunabescherming foundation. This is not the first time that they have sounded the alarm. Last year, a majority of the House of Representatives supported a motion to make the Crown Domain publicly accessible throughout the year.

 

But the cabinet does not agree with this, according to Schouten's answers. On the basis of certain subsidy conditions, the conclusion of the Crown Domain would indeed be possible. The minister says there is a link "with the protection of the king's privacy". No further explanation is given.

 

Yacht

So it remains unclear why the park will be closed for three months in the fall. In previous letters, the minister said it was necessary "for the balance between wood production, the presence of large ungulates and the recreational opportunities". PvdD MP Wassenberg wants to know whether the royal yacht plays a role in the cabinet position that the Crown Domain may be closed. Schouten denies this and writes that "there is no link between granting subsidies and managing populations".

 

In October, the House of Representatives will again discuss the king's budget. Then the opening up of the king's hunting forest will be discussed again. The subsidy for the Crown Domain expires at the end of this year and Prime Minister Rutte has promised to discuss a new subsidy for issuing it with the Chamber.



Why did the king receive an exception for hunting the Crown Domain? 'This is a clap of hands'

 

The cabinet deliberately made a derogation for King Willem-Alexander, which allows him to close kroondomein Het Loo three months a year and still receive a subsidy of 4.7 million. The Chamber was not informed about this at the time. That's according to underlying documents released last Friday.

 

Niek Megens 07-03-21, 15:48 Last update: 08-03-21, 11:20

https://www.destentor.nl/regio/waarom-kreeg-de-koning-een-uitzondering-voor-de-jacht-op-het-kroondomein-dit-is-handjeklap~a80dfbac/

 

Campaigners have been objecting to the royal hunt for Kroondomein Het Loo for years. The central question is whether King Willem-Alexander can close the forest and nature reserve near Apeldoorn for three months every year for this purpose. Conservationists don't think so. Now it appears that the government has adjusted an existing scheme to facilitate hunting. "This is a piece of hands in a word," says Member of Parliament Frank Wassenberg (Party for the Animals).

 

POLL

It is fine that the king closes his crown domain on the Veluwe to hunt

No, stop right away! Hunting is out of date (41%)

Fine if he wants to hunt and shut down, but then the subsidy for the area must stop (52%)

No idea, the issue is too complicated for me (7%)

8612 votes

 

According to the letter of the law, a nature manager who receives government subsidy must open the area to the public 358 days a year. In principle, this also applies to the king, who receives millions for nature conservation. Nevertheless, an exception to this rule was deliberately made, according to the documents that Agriculture Minister Carola Schouten sent to the Chamber on Friday at Wassenberg's insistence.

 

Gift to the people

Kroondomein Het Loo, a nature reserve between Apeldoorn and Elspeet, was once purchased by the Oranges as a hunting ground. Queen Wilhelmina gave the area as a gift to the Dutch people in 1959, but its management is still the responsibility of the king. It receives an annual subsidy for management and maintenance. For the period 2016-2021, this is 4.7 million euros.

 

In the hunting season from mid-September to Christmas Day, the king is also allowed to close no less than 7200 hectares of the Crown Domain 'to protect his privacy'. This is contrary to the permit requirements for the subsidy as they apply in the province of Gelderland, because it states that a manager may only keep 1 hectare for private use.

 


Wopke van der Lei and his wife went to pick cranberries last September despite the closure of the Crown Domain and were promptly hurled at the voucher by a boa. They were guilty, he says, but were acquitted for lack of evidence. © Kevin Hagens

The Gelderland regulations have been used as a basis for the exemption regulation that the Crown Domain reached with the cabinet in 2016. "They have scrapped a crucial provision from the Gelderland scheme," Wassenberg said. "Namely, that subsidized nature areas must be accessible to the public all year round, just one week after a week." Wassenberg deduces from the documents that it was not the privacy of the king but the hunt that was decisive.

 

It has been knowingly chosen not to follow the royal path and thus the Chamber has been denied information

 

Frank wassenberg, Member of Parliament party for the animals

This is evident from the released documents. "Within one week in March 2016, two almost identical notes were published in which a passage was added in the second note about the opening times in relation to hunting. I want to know what happened in that week, because you can't deduce that from the pieces. Has there been any intervention from above?'' Wassenberg suspects so. "Prime Minister Rutte and Minister Schouten can answer this."  

 

Fear of unrest

The documents also show that no separate subsidy scheme for the king has been set up for fear of unrest. The Senate and the House of Representatives should be informed about this, and that could cause a political and social fuss. "They have therefore copied and adjusted the Gelderland scheme. It has been knowingly chosen not to follow the royal path and with that the Chamber has been denied information. A political sin'', says Wassenberg. 

 

Safety

Prior to the granting of subsidies, the Ministry of Economic Affairs has been frantically emailing back and forth between civil servants how to formulate this exemption. This is ultimately 'primarily motivated by safety considerations for the crown bearer'.

 

Wassenberg calls that nonsense. "The site is open 8.5 months a year. Then it's safe, isn't it? This is purely about hunting and that can never be a legal basis for the closure of the Crown Domain.''

 

The Crown Domain has been unfairly closed all this time

 

Frank Wassenberg, Party for the Animals

 

Wassenberg believes that the king has a 'moral obligation' to repay the subsidy of millions. "The Crown Domain has been unfairly closed all this time. I assume that the gates will remain open on 15 September this year.'' Wassenberg wants a debate on this issue as soon as possible after the elections.

Saturday, 18 September 2021

The future of fashion: Bolt Threads / Fashion faces a stark choice: stop flogging cheap clothes or go out of style


The uncomfortable truth is that because fashion is indeed 'made from nature', its current industrial practices gobble up staggering quantities of water, chemicals and fossil fuels, degrading the land and the diversity of nature's species while belching out 1.9 billion tonnes of waste per year.

Dilys Williams, Director of the Centre for Sustainable Fashion; Professor of Fashion Design for Sustainability, London College of Fashion

 

As the demands on the Earth's resources by the fashion industry continue to grow, innovative research is underway to address the impact on the natural world. Ranging from synthetic biology to the use of root structures as potential fibres, these creative solutions and their early adoption by the industry indicate a willingness to change and become more sustainable in the future.

https://www.vam.ac.uk/articles/the-future-of-fashion?gclid=Cj0KCQjw1ouKBhC5ARIsAHXNMI8xNxOsx0lKa5OPs25_jlCxskN4dq4ievoy8_nUuheci3rPs3apxFkaAjbdEALw_wcB

 

Opinion

Fashion



Jess Cartner-Morley

Unless the industry starts taking sustainability seriously, it risks becoming the thing it most dreads – uncool

Thu 16 Sep 2021 16.30 BST

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/sep/16/fashion-cheap-clothes-style-sustainability-uncool

 

Fashion has become a dirty word – and believe me, it hurts. Not long ago, fashion was the VIP room of popular culture and movie stars and politicians flocked to the front row. Now it has come to symbolise everything that is wrong with the modern world – from carbon emissions to global inequality and from crass materialism to unrealistic beauty standards. Fashion is not the only polluting industry, or the only morally dubious one. But even if you love fashion, as I do, it’s hard to deny that it tracks in the 99th percentile for pretty much all of the most problematic contemporary issues.

 

Everyone in fashion knows that they need to get back on the right side of history, and fast. Sustainability is a baseline responsibility that every self-respecting brand must be seen to engage with. The New York brand Collina Strada last week staged one of the first live shows of the first back-to-real-life catwalk season on the rooftop of Brooklyn Grange, an organic city farm that donates 30% of its produce to community members with limited means. Much of the collection was made out of “deadstock” – fabric and product that already exists, rather than being newly produced. Clothes made in 2020, which had been stuck in lockdown and never shipped or sold, were cut up and repurposed into something new. “Old birthday presents” were taken apart and reassembled into beaded bags and rhinestone jewellery, said the designer Hillary Taymour. Taymour was rewarded with a benediction in the form of Ella Emhoff, stepdaughter of the vice-president, Kamala Harris, applauding from the front row.

 

There is a powerful business case for fashion to find its conscience: consumers increasingly demand it. Responsible production has become the hallmark of a respectable brand. To the people of Idaho, Washington and Oregon, who recently endured intense heatwaves, the fact that it takes 2,700 litres of water to produce a single cotton T-shirt in a world where droughts are becoming more common probably feels like more of an urgent issue. LVMH, the world’s biggest luxury group, faces the prospect of carbon emissions from the fashion industry affecting its lucrative alcohol business. “If climate increases a couple of degrees in the next 25 years, then we simply will not be able to make champagne in Champagne anymore … our economic future depends on the climate change being reduced,” wrote Antoine Arnault of LVMH in Womenswear Daily last year.

 

Sustainability is not a new issue. What does feel very different this time around, as the industry gathers for the first shows and cocktail parties since the olden times, is fashion’s psychological state. Establishment figures are aware that for the first time in their careers, what they do is seen as a bit, well, uncool. This year has seen a steady exodus of editors from fashion magazines to tech. Netflix recently hired editors of Allure and Them, while TikTok hired Vanessa Craft from the Canadian edition of Elle. Silicon Valley doesn’t just have deep pockets: it’s also seen as the place to be.

 

For years, fashion waved away criticism with the cry that we all need escapism, a defence that rings increasingly hollow against the seriousness of the charges. “Covid and the climate emergency both show that money and luxury can’t protect you from the real world,” the British designer Roland Mouret told me this week. “That fashion fantasy of a beautiful woman in a gown on an exotic beach – I don’t think that resonates now, because that kind of perfection just doesn’t exist any more.” Wilful escapism feels twee and old-fashioned in an age when it is cool to engage. Billie Eilish played out a Marilyn Monroe fantasy on the Met Gala red carpet this week, wearing a fairytale blush silk ballgown by Oscar de la Renta – but in return, the brand agreed to a request by Eilish, a vegan animal rights activist, that it would stop using fur in all collections with immediate effect. That is the stuff young girls’ dreams are made of – these days.

 

The Met Gala was a glitzy showcase of fashion’s new progressive bent. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s “Tax the rich” dress grabbed the headlines. Versha Sharma, editor of Teen Vogue, carried a clutch bag engraved with the words “Protect Roe / Kill the Filibuster” in response to the Texas abortion ban. Jonathan Anderson, the British designer of the Spanish luxury house Loewe, collaborated with actor and writer Dan Levy to dress him as “a gay superhero” in a polo shirt embroidered with an artwork of two men kissing, which Levy described as a celebration “of queer love and visibility”. In support of the message, Loewe made a donation to an organisation promoting Aids awareness and education.

 

But although the emotional engagement with social justice and the climate emergency is real, action is not happening at the speed required. (As so often, fashion reflects the rest of the world in this – just in a more exaggerated and exasperating form.) There is still far too much talk of “raising awareness” around sustainability, which with less than three months to go until Cop26 is the equivalent of liking photos of stable doors on Instagram after the horse has bolted. A new report on greenwashing, published this week by Eco-Age and the Geneva Centre for Business and Human Rights, reports that while “all major fashion brands claim to be engaged in sustainability efforts … many are struggling and indeed failing, because they are using a flawed definition of sustainability, unscientific methods and selective implementation”. The report also identifies “greenwishing” – fancying oneself less environmentally harmful than one is in reality – to be a problem in fashion.

 

By producing too many clothes, the fashion industry has not just harmed the climate, it has also undermined its own status. A dress in the new season silhouette or a pair of boots in autumn’s hot new shade were once aspirational objects. But a two-decade deluge of cheap-as-chips items has left the world disdainful of clothes – and, as a result, tired of fashion. Fashion faces a stark choice: keep flogging cheap clothes, or get back in vogue.

 

Jess Cartner-Morley is associate editor (fashion) at the Guardian


Friday, 17 September 2021

Queen of Denmark hired as set designer on new Netflix film

 



Film

Queen of Denmark hired as set designer on new Netflix film

 

Queen Margrethe II, the reigning Danish monarch, will add an adaptation of Karen Blixen’s fantasy novel Ehrengard to her two previous screen credits

 

Andrew Pulver

 @Andrew_Pulver

Tue 31 Aug 2021 16.38 BST

https://amp.theguardian.com/film/2021/aug/31/queen-of-denmark-margrethe-ii-set-designer-netflix-ehrengard-karen-blixen

 

Queen Margrethe II, reigning monarch of Denmark, is to design the sets for a forthcoming Netflix film adapted from a novel by Karen Blixen, it has been announced.

 

A romantic fantasy set in the fairytale kingdom of Babenhausen, Ehrengard will be directed by Bille August, the veteran Danish director of Pelle the Conqueror (which won both the Palme d’Or and Oscar for best foreign language film in 1988) and The Best Intentions (which won August a second Palme d’Or).

 

Margrethe, who ascended to the Danish throne in 1972 and is commander-in-chief of the country’s defence forces, has also had a long career as an artist, including drawing the illustrations for Danish editions of Lord of the Rings, and exhibitions at galleries including the Arken Museum of Modern Art in Ishoj near Copenhagen. She also has screen credits as a production designer on the 2009 fantasy fairy tale The Wild Swans, and a short film adaptation of Hans Christian Andersen’s The Snow Queen in 2000.

 

In a statement, Margrethe said: “Karen Blixen’s stories have always fascinated me, with their aesthetic tales, their imagination and their, to me, image-creating worlds – and I’m very happy to be part of this project. I have tried to interpret Blixen’s fantastic universe in the creation of the decoupages and costumes and I’m looking forward to seeing the tale of Ehrengard come to life in this film.”

 

August added: “The Queen has created the most fantastic decoupages for the occasion, and they will be the dominant feature of the film’s overall scenographic expression. ‘Fantastic’ (in the most literal sense) is our starting point for the film; we wish to use humour and elegance to create a devil-may-care, burlesque, fabulous and autonomous visual universe.”

 

Ehrengard is due for release in 2023.

Thursday, 16 September 2021

Dandy Style: 250 Years of British Men's Fashion by Shaun Cole (Editor), Miles Lambert (Editor


 

Dandy Style: 250 Years of British Men's Fashion

by Shaun Cole (Editor), Miles Lambert (Editor

 

The style of the dandy is elegant but bold—dedicated to the perfection of taste. This meticulously choreographed look has a vibrant history; the legacy of Beau Brummell, the original dandy of Regency England, can be traced in the clothing of urban dandies today. Dandy Style celebrates 250 years of male self-expression, investigating the portraiture and wardrobe of the fashionable British man. Combining fashion, art, and photography, the historic and the contemporary, the provocative and the respectable, it considers key themes in the development of male style and identity, including elegance, uniformity, and spectacle. Various types of dandy are represented by iconic figures such as Oscar Wilde, Edward VIII as Prince of Wales, and Gilbert & George. They appear alongside the seminal designs of Vivienne Westwood, Ozwald Boateng, and Alexander McQueen; and portraits by Thomas Gainsborough and David Hockney.

 


REVIEW

Dedicated Followers

 

A thoughtful long view of men’s participation in, and consumption of, fashionable dress.

 

Jade Halbert | Published in History Today Volume 71 Issue 3 March 2021

https://www.historytoday.com/archive/review/dedicated-followers

 

The fashionable man is something of a shape-shifter in the history of British dress. Alternately worshipped and reviled, he has represented – across various centuries – the vain ‘Fop’, the ridiculous ‘Fribble’, the flamboyant ‘Macaroni’, the posturing ‘Peacock’ and, most prominently, the exquisite ‘Dandy’. ‘A Dandy’, wrote the historian Thomas Carlyle in an oft-quoted passage, ‘is a clothes-wearing Man, a Man whose trade, office and existence consists in the wearing of Clothes ... others dress to live, he lives to dress’. This (rather monstrous) caricature has endured and thus men’s fashion as a topic of study has sometimes been reduced to overly simplistic analyses (usually tied up with questions of gender and sexuality), or ignored altogether in favour of women’s fashion. Of course, there are exceptions – Christopher Breward’s The Suit (2016) and Peter McNeil’s Pretty Gentlemen (2018) stand out – but a more holistic treatment of the topic has been long overdue.

 

With this in mind, Dandy Style: 250 years of British Men’s Fashion is most welcome. Published to accompany a landmark exhibition at Manchester Art Gallery (now expected to open in November 2021), Dandy Style is a thoughtful long view of men’s participation in, and consumption of, fashionable dress, which brings together a range of authors to provide a vibrant and meticulous new account of men, their clothes and sartorial self expression across three centuries. It considers elegance, subversion, globalisation and representation of the masculine in fashion and brings clarity to the historiography around dandyism. Richly illustrated and beautifully designed, it is both an intellectual and visual treat.

 

For various reasons, far less fashionable menswear has survived the centuries than fashionable womenswear; as Lambert notes, this has resulted in a ‘historical paucity of studies of men’s clothing’ and thus a distortion of the historical record as it relates to dress. Refreshingly, in addition to an excellent introduction on the history of men’s fashion and the intellectual frameworks that have defined its study, and chapters that illuminate the importance of portraiture, performance, and extravagance in menswear, Dandy Style prioritises surviving objects. Through them, the imbalance of museum collecting policy is highlighted, while the wardrobes of noted modern dandies (including that of the infamously modish Sir Roy Strong) are plundered and studied in microscopic detail for what they reveal not only about the lives of their wearers but about men, clothes and fashionable masculine tastes more generally. What emerges is the clear realisation that dandyism is more than just fashion history; it is a thriving modern fashion culture that stretches across social, economic, race and gendered boundaries. This is the triumph of Dandy Style; it is not encumbered by the caricature of the dandy as the wealthy white exquisite who lives to dress, it looks closely, stands back, shifts focus and sees beyond that caricature.

 

It has proved too tempting in the past to consign men who express an interest in fashion to some imagined category of people who mistake novelty bow ties for personality, or to assume that men who care about style and taste must be lacking in more ‘typically’ masculine interests. Dandy Style demolishes these clichés and shows that the relationships between men and the clothes they choose to wear is far more complex, far more interesting and, actually, far more fabulous than that.

 

Dandy Style: 250 Years of British Men’s Fashion

Edited by Shaun Cole and Miles Lambert

Yale 168pp £25

 

Jade Halbert is Lecturer in Fashion and Cultural Studies at the University of Huddersfield.








Wednesday, 15 September 2021

Former models expose the ugly truth of the beauty industry | 60 Minutes ...


‘He wanted to control me completely’: the models who accuse Gérald Marie of sexual assault

 

Elite Models boss Gérald Marie was one of the most powerful men in fashion. Was he also a sexual predator? As French prosecutors investigate, four women tell their stories for the first time

 

A special investigation

 



by Lucy Osborne

Sat 17 Oct 2020 07.00 BST

https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2020/oct/17/he-wanted-to-control-me-completely-the-models-who-accuse-gerald-marie-of-sexual-assault

 

In the spring of 1980, Wendy Walsh and her mother flew to Paris from their home in a suburb of Toronto, Canada. Walsh was 17, a straight-A student who excelled at maths. She was also an aspiring model whose blond, blue-eyed, girl-next-door look had already got her noticed; at a local hairdressing event, a couple of stylists from a Paris salon had offered to send her headshots to a leading model agency, Paris Planning. Letters and phone calls had been exchanged, and Walsh was invited to Paris.

 

At the agency’s offices, Walsh and her mother, Ellen, were introduced to the charismatic 30-year-old boss, Gérald Marie. Marie offered to take them to lunch. “So we went to a little outdoor bistro in the Place de la Madeleine, around the corner from the agency,” says Walsh, speaking on the phone from her home in Los Angeles. “It was the first time I ever had a croque monsieur, and he was explaining what it was. I realise now it’s a fancy grilled cheese sandwich. And I remember distinctly him fawning over my mother, and this was surprising to me. She had been an extremely beautiful woman in her youth, but lupus had left scars on her face.

 

“He reached over and was stroking her hand, and something in my 17-year-old stomach was like, this is weird.” Later, in their hotel room, Walsh remembers her mother saying: “‘Oh, that man is lovely, he’s going to take care of you.’ I look back on it with adult eyes, and I believe this is the way that he groomed families. He lured girls in by convincing them that somehow he would be this very safe guardian of their teenage daughter.”

 

Two months later, in June 1980, Walsh moved to Paris. “I was young, I was naive, and I had stars in my eyes,” she says now. “I was not scared one little bit, because I trusted all the adults who were going to take care of me and make me a famous model.”

 

Walsh, who is now 58 and a respected US radio host, was one of dozens of hopefuls from across North America and Europe who made the journey to Paris in the summer of 1980. Over the following decades, thousands of young women went to work for Marie and other agencies there, desperate to make it as a model. But few became stars, and many were not taken care of in the way Walsh’s mother would have expected.

 

Within weeks of arriving in Paris, Walsh says, she was raped by Gérald Marie. A Guardian special investigation has found that she is one of eight women who allege they were sexually assaulted by Marie between 1980 and 1998. Four are speaking for the first time.

 

Last month, French prosecutors announced that they had opened an investigation into Marie, after a criminal complaint from four women: three former models, who have taken part in this investigation, and Lisa Brinkworth, a journalist who says she was sexually assaulted while working undercover for the BBC. Marie, who at 70 still works in the modelling industry, denies the allegations. In a statement to the Sunday Times about the French investigation, he said: “It would not be appropriate for me to comment at this time on the allegations of historic wrongdoing being made against me, other than to make it clear that I categorically deny them.”

 

By the time Wendy Walsh came to Paris in 1980, Marie had been at Paris Planning for five years, reportedly after a brief stint working as a dancer on local television. The son of a hospital administrator, he quickly earned a reputation as one of the most powerful and well-connected agents in Europe, a man who could make a model’s career with the click of a finger or a call to Vogue. In 1986, Paris Planning merged with Elite Model Management, the agency later credited with inventing the supermodel, and Marie became its European president. He ran the agency alongside Elite founder John Casablancas, who was based in New York; together, they helped launch the careers of Naomi Campbell, Cindy Crawford, Helena Christensen and others.

 

But behind the gloss and glamour of the 90s fashion world, Marie had established a reputation as a predator. A number of former models and industry insiders have told the Guardian his abusive behaviour was “an open secret”, and part of an ingrained culture of exploitation at the heart of the modelling world.

 

In Paris, Walsh was assigned to Paris Planning’s new-faces division, and sent to “go-sees” with potential clients. In the evenings, the now 18-year-old was told to go to parties that might help her career. “It would be rich old playboys in very glamorous apartments with big bowls of cocaine. Everybody drunk. There was no business being done, no photographers there,” she says.

 

Around six weeks in, Walsh was told by a female booker that Marie wanted her to dye her hair brown, and she was sent to a hairdresser. That evening, she was invited to a party at which Marie would be present. “The only times I’d seen him had been in the agency, holding court,” Walsh says. At the party, in a tiny apartment, she found Marie sitting on a bed. “He said, ‘Come here’, and he put his hand through my hair, and he said, ‘This is good, this is what I like.’ And I thought he was my boss, telling me I was going to get a lot of work now.”

 

Based on my own experiences, I believe these women are telling the truth. It breaks my heart and I admire their courage

Linda Evangelista

 

The next day, at the agency’s offices, Walsh was told that Marie wanted to meet her again, this time at his apartment. “With the wise eyes of a grownup, business meetings don’t take place at apartments at nine o’clock at night,” she says. “But when you’re 18 and believing all the adults around you, you just do what you’re told. So I went.

 

“In Paris, you hit the light switch at the bottom of the dark stairway, then you work your way up. I stood outside his door, and I knocked and knocked until the lights went out after three minutes, and I was scrambling around looking for a switch. I waited another three minutes, and then walked all the way home.”

 

Back at her apartment, the phone rang. It was her booker, telling her that Marie had been busy and that she should go back: he was waiting. By then it was 10pm, and Walsh had no money for a cab. “And so again, I walk and walk for 20 minutes through Paris at night.”

 

Walsh knocked on Marie’s door. This time a young model came out, smiling and giggling. “She kissed him on both cheeks, said goodbye. So then I went in, and he said, ‘Oh, that girl, she’s one of our models, and she’s having so many problems with her boyfriend. They always come to me about their boyfriend problems.’”

 

Marie poured her a glass of champagne and offered her hors d’oeuvres. He told Walsh that he had heard she was Catholic, and that he was, too. “It was like, what was going to happen was OK, because he was a trusted person in my club or tribe.” Then, within minutes, “his hand was down my shirt, and he was saying to me, ‘You are the only model in the agency with large breasts – I love it.’ All I was thinking was, ‘If I make this man angry, I’ll never get work again.’”

 

Walsh tried to make excuses, telling Marie she wasn’t on the pill, and bargaining with him, like “a sweet, young, naive girl who’s afraid of people of power, who tries to say no, but doesn’t know how”. She alleges that he took off her clothes and anally raped her. “It hurt and I remember one thing distinctly: I buried my face in the pillow and said, ‘No’. It smelled of somebody else’s perfume.”

 

Afterwards, Walsh says, Marie grabbed a bunch of bananas from his kitchen, handed her one and asked if her roommate was “the other Canadian” (Walsh was sharing with another young model from Toronto). When she said yes, he laughed and asked her to give the girl a banana from him, she recalls. She arrived at her apartment, and asked her roommate if she had also had sex with Marie. “That was the only language I had for it then,” she says. Her roommate said yes. The next time Walsh saw Marie, he was at the agency with a male friend. “He was pointing to me and laughing,” she says. “It was the most humiliating moment.”

 

Walsh believes that part of the reason Marie was able to abuse new models like her was the language barrier. “I didn’t meet one French model while I was there. We were chosen specifically because we didn’t understand the language, would be away from home, and didn’t know what the hell was going on. He had complete control.”

 

Soon after the alleged rape, Walsh was invited to accompany her booker on a glamorous-sounding trip to Monte Carlo. But she had already been advised against travelling to the south of France by a more successful model, over tea in the twentysomething’s courtyard garden. The older model warned that this was a world of wealthy men and their boats, and that unsuspecting models could end up being exploited. “Bad things happen there,” she was told.

 

Jill Dodd never got the warning about the “bad things” that could happen in the south of France. Marie had invited the 19-year-old swim instructor to move to Paris after meeting her in her hometown of Los Angeles on a talent-spotting trip. Her Californian agent told her it was a great opportunity.

 

Like Walsh, Dodd spent the spring of 1980 navigating the Paris Métro, and attending “go-sees” set up by Paris Planning. But after several weeks, she started to rack up debts to the agency, who were not only charging her fees, but also billing her for a dingy hotel and her flight from California. After one long day of rejections, Dodd recalls crying on a street corner as it got dark, feeling exhausted.

 

On 23 April 1980, Marie asked Dodd, then 20, and her roommate out dancing. She felt hopeful: time spent with her boss could be good for her career. She had seen Marie send the girls he liked “straight to Vogue without even an interview”. At the club, she recalls dancing awkwardly, watching her boss in his black leather jacket. He was a confident dancer and she thought he looked sexy – a different person from the “moody” manager she’d encountered at the office. In the early hours, Dodd and her roommate went back to Marie’s apartment. When her friend left, she stayed on. Dodd says Marie kissed her and she remembers relishing the attention. “I’d only had one serious boyfriend at that time.” When Marie offered to run her a bubble bath in his marble tub, she agreed, and afterwards joined him in his bedroom to watch a John Wayne film. But “all of a sudden”, she says, Marie raped her. “It happened so fast,” she says. She shouted, “Stop”, but he did not.

 

This man had control of your life. So you make him think you’re enjoying it – then you get the hell out

 

In the days that followed, Marie told Dodd he wanted to be her boyfriend, and scribbled her a note (seen by the Guardian) saying: “I want you to behave when I’m away… don’t forget! Love, Gérald”. “I was so immature, and even though it was rape, I was confused,” she says now. “I was like, ‘Oh, he does like me! He’s so powerful.’”

 

Soon afterwards, Dodd says, she discovered that Marie had tried to have sex with her roommate; the former roommate, who spoke to the Guardian on condition of anonymity, confirms this. She added that, months later, Marie tried again. This time, she alleges, he tricked her into being alone in a room with him; she felt the only way out was to perform oral sex. “This man had control of your life. So you make him think you’re enjoying it – then you get the hell out.”

 

When Dodd was invited to Monte Carlo that summer, she jumped at the opportunity to take a break from go-sees. On her first night, she went to a party where she was introduced by her Paris Planning booker to Adnan Khashoggi, the Saudi billionaire arms dealer, then said to be the richest man in the world. The following day, Dodd says, she and the booker were invited to stay the night on his yacht, and offered their pick from a closet full of couture gowns for the evening. That was the start of a “relationship” between Dodd and Khashoggi: “I was basically one of his harem wives for almost two years,” she says now.

 

But it was a more transactional relationship than she knew. “It wasn’t until the end of our relationship that I found out that he had paid to meet me,” Dodd says. “I was chosen out of a bunch of pictures by Adnan.” She says she realised this when one of Khashoggi’s assistants came into their hotel room one evening with a portfolio of pictures of women. She says the assistant openly went through the photographs, asking whom he would like to meet, and discussing fees between $35,000 and $50,000. She says Khashoggi, who died in 2017, later admitted that he had paid Paris Planning to be introduced to her. “It was all a front. I had been manipulated and used.”

 

Ann Maguire was on her first modelling shoot, in Rome, when she was scouted by Marie. Maguire, from Virginia, was 5ft 11in, with striking blue-green eyes, high cheekbones and thick eyebrows; she was often likened to Brooke Shields. She had just turned 18, and was new to the world of fashion. “I was the jock, always sporty. I’d never even worn mascara before,” she tells me now. She says Marie showered her with compliments and made her feel “a million dollars”. He invited her to Paris and promised to get her work straight away. Maguire signed up to Paris Planning, and on 31 January 1980 moved into Marie’s spare room: she is one of several former models the Guardian has spoken to who were put up in his apartment. (While Maguire, Walsh and Dodd all worked for Paris Planning in 1980, they have never met or heard each other’s stories.)

 

Maguire, now 60, has decided to speak for the first time about what happened next. Initially, she says, Marie was charming. “He would play great music and fix great meals, all this kind of stuff… Then, as it grew into a friendship, he proceeded to abuse that.” She alleges she was raped several times by Marie while living in his apartment, and that at night he would ignore her pleas for him to stop and “crawl into bed with me”. She remembers him “flaunting” other models he was romantically involved with, kissing them in front of her, or joking that their toothbrush was in his bathroom. In her notebook at the time, which she still has, she scribbled: “Fight with Gérald” and “Too fat!”

 

Eventually, Maguire snapped. “I said, ‘Screw you, I’m going to get my own apartment.’” But after moving into an apartment with other models, she says her work stopped. She began busking with her guitar, and one day returned home to find a note from Paris Planning telling her she could no longer live there. She says all her shoes and her passport were missing, which she believes Marie took: “He wanted to control me completely.” She began sleeping on a bench in front of the Louvre.

 

A booker at the agency arranged for her to stay with another man, who she says also sexually abused her. Maguire wishes now that she had reported the assaults to the police, but didn’t consider it at the time “because I was afraid of not working again”. She explains: “I thought they would laugh at me. ‘You’re living in his house, what do you expect?’ I also didn’t speak French well enough to explain.”

 

On one of several phone calls with me, Maguire breaks down in tears; she tells me it is a time of her life she would rather forget. She returned home to Virginia and didn’t model again for at least another year.

 

Another former model, EJ Moran, says that when she was in her 20s, she was raped so violently by Marie that she feared for her life. Now 61 and an author, she is still scared of him, 40 years on. One evening in the summer of 1981, when she was turning 22, she was phoned by a booker at Paris Planning to say she had to attend a dinner with Marie right away. “I really didn’t want to go,” she recalls. “But I felt coerced into it [by the booker].” Dodd and Walsh say the same woman arranged their evening meetings with Marie, and sent them to parties they didn’t want to go to.

 

The booker “disappeared abruptly right after dinner”, Moran recalls, and Marie persuaded her to go up to his apartment, which was across the street, so he could show her promotional videos for the agency’s most famous models. “VCRs were a new thing in the 80s,” she explains. Moran remembers she was wearing “lavender-coloured pumps, a white blouse and a forest-green sweater”, as well as “mom jeans”. Suddenly, she says, Marie raped her. “Before I know it, I was thrown on the bed. He took his open palm and smashed my face into the bed.” He verbally abused her, in what she describes as “a terrible low voice”.

 

Afterwards, Moran says, the “debonair and charming” Marie returned, asking her to stay the night. She made an excuse about needing to change her contact lenses; she was scared that if she wasn’t polite, he would hurt her again. In the following days, she received a call from the booker telling her she had a well-paid catalogue job in Belgium and needed to get on a train. Moran says now that she believes this was “a message”: that if you “play this game and stay quiet, you’ll get all this work”. Other women who told the Guardian they were sexually assaulted by Marie remember being offered lucrative jobs in the days that followed.

 

Ten years later, by 1991, the modelling industry had hit its golden years, and Marie was firmly at its helm. The original supermodels, Naomi Campbell, Linda Evangelista and Cindy Crawford, had signed with Elite Model Management, then run by Marie alongside Elite US president John Casablancas. Elite had offices around the world, from Tokyo to London; Marie now reportedly owned homes in Manhattan, Saint-Tropez, Ibiza and Paris. He had also been married to Evangelista for more than four years, telling an interviewer that he had left his previous girlfriend, American model Christine Bolster, “within the hour” of meeting Evangelista.

 

In 1991, the couple were among the celebrity guests at the final of Look of the Year, Elite’s annual international modelling contest, in New York. Evangelista wore her hair in a striking red bob with a heavy fringe, and towered over Marie, who wore a black suit and tie, his hair slicked back. Evangelista joined Naomi Campbell to present a prize, while Marie sat with fellow judges Casablancas and Donald Trump in the audience.

 

Canadian schoolgirl Shawna Lee was a 15-year-old Look of the Year finalist the following year. In the weeks leading up to the 1992 contest, she was sent by Elite to Paris from her hometown outside Toronto to build up her portfolio. She had already visited in the spring, staying in Marie and Evangelista’s flat while they were on holiday. “She was my idol,” Lee says now. “I was walking around her apartment and seeing these shoots she’d done with [Vogue photographer] Peter Lindbergh, so it was obviously pretty exciting.” This time, she was put up in an apartment with other models; but after an evening out at the nightclub Les Bains Douches, Lee ended up back at Marie’s apartment where, she says, he raped her – an allegation published as part of a Guardian investigation into Look of the Year in March. Speaking more recently from her home in Toronto, where she works as a makeup artist, Lee adds: “What is grossest is him asking me to put Linda’s T-shirt on to sleep in, then pouncing on me.”

 

Evangelista divorced Marie in 1993, after separating from him the year before. Speaking exclusively to the Guardian, she said: “During my relationship with Gérald Marie, I knew nothing of these sexual allegations against him, so I was unable to help these women. Hearing them now, and based on my own experiences, I believe that they are telling the truth. It breaks my heart, because these are wounds that may never heal, and I admire their courage and strength for speaking up today.”

 

At the time, Lee confided in a fellow model, and this got back to Marie. She says he took her into his office and berated her for “going around saying I raped you”, suggesting her career would be on the line. She says he told her: “What else are you going to do? Go back home and flip burgers?” Other staff at the agency found out: “It was just understood that it was in my best interests to brush it under the rug.”

 

At least five women the Guardian spoke to say they experienced sexual misconduct from other men who worked with or for Marie. Lee says that after Marie raped her, a Paris Elite scout and friend of Marie told her that the two men had been competing over “who was going to get your virginity”. She says the scout was “kind of mad that he [Marie] got it first.”

 

Lee, then 15, went on to have a sexual relationship with the scout, which at the time she thought was consensual. As an adult, she’s not so sure: “It was definitely an abuse of power.” The Guardian has spoken to two other former Elite models, then 15 and 17, who allege they were sexually assaulted by the same scout, and one, then 19, who says he raped her.

 

Swedish model Ebba Karlsson, who was 20 in 1990, alleges she was raped that year by a different Elite scout, and that, days later, she was introduced to Marie. Karlsson says that when she arrived at his office, the first thing he did was lower the blinds. “There was a window between his office and other people in the agency,” she explains. She says Marie then took her through the portfolios of famous models he represented and asked her if she knew what they did to become successful. Then, she says, “Suddenly, his hand was inside my vagina. It was so quick and abrupt, I totally froze.” After the meeting, she sat down on the “first available bench” and cried, feeling “ashamed and in shock”.

 

On another occasion, Karlsson agreed to go to a “casting” at Marie’s apartment. He had told her she had a lot of film potential because she spoke several languages. The other models there looked younger than her, she says, perhaps 16 or 17, and some were living in his apartment. “Some were sick, they had colds or something, and did not look great.” She and the others were told to take off their clothes, don high heels, then walk and pose for Marie and two other men. “They wanted to see our boobs. And I don’t know if that was the common practice, but it was like a meat market. It was horrible.”

 

A movie never materialised, and Karlsson went back to Sweden as soon as she was able, returning to her job at the Body Shop. “Marie took my power away,” Karlsson says now. “I was powerful before, I could protect myself. But after that, I was just a shaking leaf.”

 

In 2011, the supermodel Carré Otis published a memoir, Beauty, Disrupted, which included claims that she was repeatedly raped by Marie when she was 17. In an interview with the Guardian, Otis says it started around 1986, the year Paris Planning merged with Elite. She was staying in Marie and Evangelista’s apartment; it was the early days of his relationship with the supermodel. “Linda was maybe a little bit older than me,” Otis recalls. “She was soaring, she was already a star in the sky.” But when Evangelista was out of town, “he attacked me in the middle of the night”, she says. “I was sick and I had a fever. That was the beginning of many such attacks.”

 

Otis went on to become an enormously successful model, and was married to the actor Mickey Rourke, her co-star in the 1989 film Wild Orchid. But in the mid-1980s, like the other women interviewed for this investigation, she was still pounding the pavements looking for work. In her book, Otis writes that Marie told her she needed to drop more weight, giving her “a small brown glass vial of cocaine every day… this was the key to model weight management”. She says now: “It was made very clear that, if I wanted to make it, I would have to deal with his advances. That continued until I actually did say no, and then my work stopped.” Otis is one of the four women whose complaints triggered the French investigation, along with Karlsson, Dodd and journalist Lisa Brinkworth.

 

Otis says she was also abused by others connected to Marie or his agency. She alleges she was raped in her hotel room by a hairdresser on a shoot arranged by Elite. She believes that Marie and other Elite agents were making money by sending models on trips where there was “no actual work”, or to parties with wealthy men who had no connection to the industry. “I was definitely pimped out,” she says. For Dodd – who says she was sexually assaulted at a party she was sent to by Paris Planning, and by another man on a shoot arranged by the agency – this was “out in the open” in 1980. “There were all these offers of, ‘If you go on this trip, you have to sleep with the photographer,’” she says. “It was talked about out loud.”

 

It was just such a trip – to Monte Carlo – that Wendy Walsh had refused to make, back in the summer of 1980. Instead, the 18-year-old Canadian wrote to her parents from Paris, a letter they kept and which she now has. Reading it now, her disillusionment is clear: “I refuse to hang around in their social circles, and act like a prostitute to get work,” she wrote in what Walsh describes as her “swirly, little-girl handwriting”. “Unfortunately, as much as I wish it weren’t so, I have discovered that this business operates on a totally social level. If you don’t cooperate, you get stepped on.”

 

Marie Anderson, who worked for Elite between 1983 and 1990, says that to understand how Marie was able to get away with his alleged behaviour, one has to grasp the “complete control” model agencies had during this era. “It was like a cult mentality,” she says. Anderson, who worked for Elite Chicago, first as a booker and later as vice-president, says she remembers at least six different models telling her that Marie had been sexually inappropriate with them, but they swore her to secrecy, “terrified” that they would stop getting work if they complained. She recalls overhearing Trudi Tapscott, an executive at Elite in New York from 1984 to 1991, and another agent, tearfully pleading with Marie and Casablancas to stop sleeping with underage models, some time in the late 80s. Anderson says she could only warn others against working in Paris: “I wish I could have done more.”

 

Tapscott, who is still a model scout, began working for Elite at the age of 23. She says: “I was only a little bit older than the models, and also taken in by the glamour. We didn’t have the language then to know that this was wrong, and even if we did, who would we report it to? We were like a family and there was no HR department; this was the culture that protected these men. I have tremendous regret about not doing more at the time.”

 

Most of the models who spoke to the Guardian did not tell their agents about their alleged abuse, for fear it would get back to Marie. Walsh talks in terms of “psychological shackles”. “I was trapped by the fact that they’d gotten me into debt right away,” she says. “And then you had your parents at home with stars in their eyes going, ‘Send us pictures, honey, tell us how it’s going, we want to tell everybody about our famous little girl!’ And you just didn’t want to let down your parents. You didn’t want to be a failure. What a horrible catch-22 to put a teenager in.”

 

In 1999, it looked as if Marie’s alleged behaviour had caught up with him when a BBC investigation reportedly filmed him saying he hoped to seduce the contestants at Elite Model Look (the new name for Look of the Year), as well as offering an undercover journalist money for sex. In the wake of the allegations, he was suspended from Elite; in an interview at the time, he said: “I’m destroyed… I’m finished.”

 

But Elite launched a libel action against the BBC, arguing that the report was “dishonestly edited”; the agency successfully made the case that Marie had been set up by the crew. The case was settled, the BBC apologised and conceded that its portrayal was unfair. The film disappeared and Marie was reinstated, continuing to run Elite Model Look for many more years.

 

People ask how I got brave. I say: I’m a woman of a certain age. What I mean is, I learned the hard way. Gérald Marie prepared me

After years of financial mismanagement, Elite was forced into bankruptcy in 2004, splitting into two separate agencies, owned by different corporate entities, which still operate today. Marie is believed to have continued working with the New York division of Elite, Creative World Management, until as recently as 2011. The company declined to comment, but a spokesperson told the Guardian in March that it condemns the kinds of “deplorable behaviour” alleged to have taken place at Elite in the past.

 

Meanwhile, a spokesperson for Elite World Group said: “We find these alleged criminal acts egregious and abhorrent. Gérald Marie’s contract with Elite Model Management ended in December 2010, and the company was sold in 2011 to its current owners Elite World Group, for whom Marie has never worked. Elite World Group is committed to providing a safe environment for our models, and does not tolerate any form of abuse, harassment, discrimination and/or gender bias.”

 

In 2012, Marie joined Oui Management, a prestigious Paris agency whose models front Louis Vuitton campaigns and Vogue magazine covers. He remains an investor in Oui, which is registered in the UK: company documents filed in August this year state that Marie continues to be a “person with significant control” over Oui Management Ltd.

 

Although Marie has claimed he is retired, industry insiders who work with Oui Management say that until recently he had a “hands-on” role. One source has shown the Guardian emails that indicate Marie was accompanying models on castings with photographers as recently as last year. Marie’s LinkedIn page, which he recently deleted, had listed his responsibilities at the “thriving newcomer” agency as scouting for and managing talent. Oui Management has told the Guardian that Marie is not currently an employee.

 

Now married to a Russian model, Marie splits his time between Paris and his home in Ibiza, which according to a local paper has “the best French wine cellar on the island”. Responding to the new allegations put to him by the Guardian, his lawyers said that he was “extremely affected by the accusations made against him, which he contests with the utmost firmness… He intends to actively participate in the manifestation of the truth within the scope of the opened criminal investigation.”

 

Is the predatory culture of the modelling industry in the 1980s and 1990s a thing of the past? Both Anderson and Tapscott say that there is still a pressure to “stay silent” – one that applies to agents, too. Anderson says: “I can’t get a job in the modelling business any more, because I’ve been ostracised for talking out about this stuff.” She adds that it “speaks volumes” that Marie is still involved with an agency today. “It is living proof that the cult-like mentality still exists, and the code of silence remains.”

 

Meanwhile, the eight women who spoke to the Guardian say that, even 30 to 40 years after their alleged abuse, the impact on their lives has been lasting. Walsh, Dodd, Lee and Otis all battled eating disorders as a result, and several accusers went on to experience problems with alcohol or drugs.

 

Otis left Paris in 1987, moving to a farm in northern California for several months to get as “far away from [modelling] as possible”. But when her money started to run out, she approached a small agency in San Francisco and got a few jobs. “It felt safe and stable and normal,” she says. “You knew you were going to get off at five.” From there, her career took off. In 1988, she did an American Vogue cover shoot with Evangelista, the first ever to feature two models, in which they posed together on a Greek beach in matching jumpers and black caps, smiling and laughing. (There is no suggestion that Evangelista was aware of the allegations against her husband at the time.) In 1991, Otis became the face of Calvin Klein and joined Evangelista as one of the world’s most recognisable models; unlike many other women the Guardian has spoken to for this investigation, she found success without Gérald Marie.

 

Dodd, who is now 60, became a successful businesswoman (she is the founder of the surf brand Roxy) and lives with her husband and three children in the north Californian countryside. “I made it out,” she says, although she stresses that the years that followed weren’t easy.

 

Walsh remembers crying down the phone to her parents in 1980, asking them to get her home for the summer, and then back to school. “I was sitting in my mother’s basement, suffering from depression, not knowing what that was at the time,” she says. “I was just eating and crying.” She says she is coming forward now, “because I believe this is still a problem for girls in the industry today, and it needs to stop.”

 

After gaining a degree in journalism and later a PhD in clinical psychology, Walsh became a successful broadcaster. In 2017, she was the first woman to go public with sexual harassment allegations against Fox News host Bill O’Reilly. Walsh told a New York Times investigation that, when she was a regular guest on The O’Reilly Factor in 2013, he reneged on a verbal offer to secure her a lucrative position after she declined an invitation to his hotel suite. He was later sacked by Fox after it emerged he had paid five women tens of millions of dollars to settle various sexual harassment lawsuits. At the time, O’Reilly said there was no merit to the allegations. “I never mistreated anyone,” he said, adding that he had resolved matters privately to protect his children from publicity.

 

Walsh is now a qualified psychotherapist and hosts the Dr Wendy Walsh radio show. “People say, ‘How were you so brave to just go, “No”, to this powerful man who offered you a major job on television in America?’” she says. “And what I said in all the press conferences is that I’m a woman of a certain age, I’ve had some life experience. But what I really meant is, I learned the hard way. What happened with Gérald Marie prepared me for what happened with Bill O’Reilly, 30 years later. What I learned when I was 18 was to never go to the private quarters of any powerful man, whether he held your paycheck or not.”

 BIG CITY



Why an Ex-Supermodel Who Says She Was Raped at 17 Is Suing Now

 

Carré Sutton accuses a former executive at a modeling agency of sexual assault, and a second employee of enabling the attacks.

 

Ginia Bellafante

By Ginia Bellafante

Ms. Bellafante writes the Big City column, a weekly commentary on the politics, culture and life of New York City.

 

Published Aug. 13, 2021

Updated Sept. 7, 2021

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/13/nyregion/carre-otis-sutton-sexual-assault-lawsuit.html

 

In the early 1980s, long before she would become one of the most recognizable models in the world, Carré Otis was living miserably in Northern California. Her parents had split up and her family was deeply unhappy; she was dyslexic and struggling in school. At 16, she ran away and lived on the streets. “It was my only hope,” she told me recently, from her home in Colorado, where she has settled into a quiet life with her husband and children, “that I could make it in modeling.’’

 

In San Francisco, she was discovered by a modeling scout and eventually landed in New York, which she found cold and disorienting. In the boundary-less world of the late-20th-century fashion industry, where go-sees often took place in photographers’ apartments, humiliations mounted one on top of the other. She lived in what was more or less a warehouse — vulnerable, unprotected — with other young, aspiring models. Some girls had mothers with them who kept them safe. Ms. Otis was alone, “in a unique situation, a wayward child primed for what I endured.’’

 

What she endured, she has said since the publication of her memoir, “Beauty Disrupted,” a decade ago, was serial rape. She reiterated that claim in a lawsuit filed in federal court in Manhattan on Thursday. In the suit, Ms. Otis, who now goes by her married name, Carré Sutton, states that in 1986, when she was 17, she was sexually assaulted regularly by Gérald Marie, Elite Model Management’s former European chief. Also named in the suit is her booking agent at the time, Trudi Tapscott, who would later work at Vogue before founding her own agency, the Model Coaches, in New York in 2018.

 

In the wake of the #MeToo movement, Mr. Marie has come under criminal investigation in France for allegations of sexual assault dating back to the ’80s and ’90s — allegations he has denied “categorically.” As of February, 11 women who have accused him of sexual misconduct and rape had been asked to meet with investigators in Paris. Ms. Sutton is scheduled to talk to them next month. In the meantime, she has availed herself of another mode of recourse, New York State’s Child Victims Act, which allows survivors of childhood sexual abuse to pursue civil claims against those who they say harmed them, no matter how long ago.

 

Since the law was enacted in 2019, thousands of such claims have been filed, many of them against the Archdiocese of New York, and a substantial number, like Ms. Sutton’s and Virginia Giuffre’s against Prince Andrew, were brought this week, just before the window provided by the statute was set to close. It is Ms. Tapscott, the complaint maintains, whose negligence enabled the abuse, by sending Ms. Sutton from New York to Paris under the tutelage of Mr. Marie. According to the suit, the two Elite executives arranged for the teenager to live in his apartment, with Ms. Tapscott failing to let Ms. Sutton know that “the modeling agency was sending her to live in the home of a sex offender.”

 

By the mid-1980s, Mr. Marie’s treatment of young models was allegedly known. Before Mr. Marie joined the agency in 1985, Elite’s founder, John Casablancas, was wary of an association with him, the suit claims, quoting a former business partner of his who said Mr. Casablancas had called Mr. Marie “a sleaze” who “beats up girls” and “rapes them.”

 

The pattern of assault began, the complaint states, when Mr. Marie’s girlfriend, the model Linda Evangelista (whom he would later marry and then divorce), was out of town. In the apartment, on Rue du Bac, Ms. Sutton was put in his daughter’s vacant room. “It became clearer and clearer to me that if I did push back, I would not work” Ms. Sutton told me. When she did push back, she said, she did lose work.

 

Not long after this period of emotional and professional descent, she returned to California and moved to a farm, where she lived with midwives and herbalists. She eventually found fame on her own terms, working with superstar photographers like Herb Ritts and Richard Avedon and modeling for Calvin Klein. But intimacy with men was impossible for years, she told me; abusive romantic relationships followed, and she had also grown to roundly mistrust women.

 

If Ms. Sutton was betrayed by Ms. Tapscott in the way the suit lays out, by being directed toward a predator, how should the law respond? “Any time you are working with children, there is a heightened responsibility to keep them safe,” said Carrie Goldberg, a Brooklyn lawyer who has represented many adult victims of child sex abuse. The problem for young models, particularly during the ’80s and ’90s, was that “they weren’t seen as children, but legally they are, and they were.”

 

Ms. Sutton’s lawyers will first have to prove — in the absence of text chains and emails, which did not exist 35 years ago — that Ms. Tapscott knew about Mr. Marie’s proclivities and endangered her anyway. In response to an investigation into Mr. Marie’s conduct and the various accusations against him, published last fall by The Guardian, Ms. Tapscott did not claim obliviousness but said instead: “We didn’t have the language then to know that this was wrong, and even if we did, who would we report it to? We were like a family and there was no HR department.” She went on to say that she had “tremendous regret about not doing more at the time.” In regard to Ms. Sutton’s suit, Ms. Tapscott declined to comment.

 

In the summer of 1986, according to the suit, Ms. Sutton told Ms. Tapscott what had happened to her, and Ms. Tapscott reported the news to Mr. Casablancas, the man in charge, via written memo. Mr. Casablancas, who died in 2013, was said to advise Mr. Marie simply to be more cautious in the future. Mr. Casablancas was in no position to offer a moral counter example. What he described as his affair with the model Stephanie Seymour took place when she was 15 and he was 41. He was married at the time but that relationship ended. At 51, he married again, this time to a 17-year-old.

 

It takes only a quick saunter through the annals of recent history to realize how little cultural condemnation was directed at this sort of behavior. Even as recently as 2017, just eight months before the #MeToo movement exploded, Netflix released the documentary “Casablancas: The Man Who Loved Women,” directed by a former Elite booker, Hubert Woroniecki, who told The Wall Street Journal that it was not his job to “make an investigation.” (The article in which that quote appeared ran under the headline: “A New Netflix Documentary Tells the Story of Elite Model Management’s Colorful Founder.”)

 

I asked Ms. Sutton what she hoped to gain by bringing her case at this moment, just as the deadline was closing. She said she was motivated in large part by her anger over Bill Cosby’s release from prison, and by watching her two daughters enter adolescence only to see clearly how young and unformed girls of that age really are. “They are children,’’ she told me. A lawsuit like this also comes with the potential to encourage other victims to come forward.

 

Exactly a year ago, Ms. Sutton, along with 12 other people, addressed a letter to Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo urging him to support the Adult Survivors Act, which would extend the statute of limitations on civil claims to those who suffered sexual abuse when they were 18 or older. Given the frequency with which women and men in their late teens and early 20s are preyed upon, the law is a logical corollary to the Child Victims Act. Although the State Senate passed the bill earlier this year, the Assembly did not bring it to the floor for a vote before adjourning. Now, perhaps it will go forward. As State Senator Brad Hoylman, the bill’s sponsor in that chamber, put it, “Wouldn’t that be a fitting coda to the end of the Cuomo administration?”

 

Ginia Bellafante has served as a reporter, critic and, since 2011, as the Big City columnist. She began her career at The Times as a fashion critic, and has also been a television critic. She previously worked at Time magazine. @GiniaNYT