Friday, 6 November 2026
Agatha Christie's Greenway A Home In Devon. VIDEO below
The Queen of Mystery: Discover the World of Agatha Christie
Critic’s
Notebook
The
Mysterious Case of the Real Agatha Christie
At the
British Library, visitors are invited to sift through a lifetime of clues to
uncover the woman behind the world’s best-selling crime novels.
By Rosa
Lyster
Reporting
from London
Nov. 4,
2026
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/11/04/books/agatha-christie-british-library.html?searchResultPosition=1
One
evening in the early 1960s, the 72-year-old Agatha Christie put on a sparkly
dress and went to a party at the Savoy Hotel in London. It was a celebration of
the 10th anniversary of her play “The Mousetrap,” which had, at that point,
been seen by 1.5 million people.
Christie
was famously publicity shy, but even so, she stood in front of the assembled
guests and made a speech for the cameras. She thanked everyone for coming,
emphasized her surprise that the play had run for so long — she had thought it
would run for only eight months — and, in general, struck a remarkably
diffident pose. If this had happened in one of her books, she said, “it really
wouldn’t be a person like me who had written a play that had run for years.”
She smiled at her delighted audience, displaying what can only be described as
a set of old-fashioned English teeth.
Image
A display
evoking the style of country house that featured in Christie’s
tales.Credit...Sam Bush for The New York Times
Footage
of the speech can be seen in the final room of the British Library’s charming
new show “Agatha Christie: A World of Mystery.” Watching, I was
surprised at how thin and reedy her voice sounded — and how grand. She says “gretitude”
and “ectors” and manages to squeeze a whole lot of extra vowel sounds
into the word “old.” But I would probably have been surprised no matter what
her voice sounded like.
For
someone with a career as dense with superlatives as hers — author of the
longest-running play of all time (“The Mousetrap” is celebrating its 75th
anniversary this month), best-selling novelist of all time, most translated
author of all time, a woman who has moved beyond “household name” status into
something like “pillar of civilization” status — she remains an elusive and
misunderstood figure.
Image

A
typewriter that once belonged to Christie.Credit...Sam Bush for The New York
Times; courtesy Christie Archive Trust
Because
she spent most of her outrageously successful career avoiding the spotlight,
people have tended to fill in the blanks by conflating her with Miss Marple,
one of her most beloved creations, and have projected onto her the qualities of
a snuggly old village busybody who never ventured too far outside the parish.
The
British Library show’s stated aim is to dismantle this false picture and reveal
the real woman behind the books. From room to room, visitors move through a
series of settings that will be immediately recognizable to Christie’s fans,
and to people who have never read her books but have nevertheless absorbed her
influence through osmosis: the country house, the dispensary, the train car,
the archaeological dig.
Image

Elements
like an old train car will be familiar even to those who haven’t read
Christie’s books.Credit...Sam Bush for The New York Times
It’s fun.
Visitors are invited to treat the show as a case to be cracked, to view the
material on display as clues that will not only reveal the truth about the
woman who left them behind, but also, per the wall text, “uncover the secrets
of her success.”
The
strategy is partly effective. The idea of Christie as a matronly vicarage-fete
type does not, for instance, survive contact with photographs on display in the
archaeological dig section, which details her life with her second husband, Max
Mallowan, an archaeologist 14 years her junior. Here, an image of an
adventurous and unconventional life emerges.
Image

Christie’s
passport in which she lists her profession as “married woman.”Credit...Sam Bush
for The New York Times; courtesy Christie Archive Trust
For most
of the 1930s and 1940s, Christie and Mallowan spent several months each year in
what is now Iraq, living and working on digs together. It was an extremely
productive period for Christie. It seemed she could write almost anywhere, and
during that time she published an average of two books per year.
One of my
favorite things in the show was a slightly out of focus photograph of Christie
at work at her desk on site in Nineveh, near Mosul, in a simply furnished room
with light streaming through the window onto her typewriter. It’s almost a
parody of an ideal writing life.
Image

A
photograph of Christie working at a desk in Nineveh, near Mosul in present-day
Iraq.Credit...Sam Bush for The New York Times
When she
wasn’t churning out novels, she was assisting Mallowan and his team. Also in
the show are delicate ivory plaques from the 9th to the 7th century B.C., a
sphinx and a male figure, accompanied by an explanation that Christie used her
face cream to clean the ancient carvings. As she later recounted, “There was
nothing left for my poor old face for a couple of weeks.”
Image

Ivory
plaques from the 9th to the 7th century B.C. that Christie cleaned using her
face cream.Credit...Sam Bush for The New York Times; courtesy British Museum
Equally
surprising are Christie’s notebooks, which she used to work out plots and
characterization, grinding through possibilities before arriving at her elegant
solutions. In the “Dispensary” section, which explores her work as a
pharmacist’s dispenser at a hospital during World War I, there is a notebook
opened to a page with the penciled heading “Poisons: Possibilities for Books,”
with details of effects and fatal doses.
There is
also a notebook in the section that deals a breakdown Christie suffered in
1926, which happened after her mother died and she discovered that her first
husband had been unfaithful. Christie fled to a hotel and checked in under the
last name of her husband’s mistress, hiding out for 11 days while a nationwide
search for her went on. (A “Missing” poster on display explains that she was
wearing “a small green velour hat” at the time of her disappearance.)
Image

A
notebook in which Christie, who worked as a pharmacist’s dispenser during World
War I, made notes on “Poisons: Possibilities for Books,” with details of
effects and fatal doses.Credit...Sam Bush for The New York Times; courtesy
Christie Archive Trust
Christie’s
explanation that she developed sudden amnesia is hard to square with what is
known about the condition, but a notebook from around the time of her
disappearance gives some idea of the strain she was under. It shows her
laborious efforts to meet her daily word count for a book she was writing, “The
Mystery of the Blue Train.” She usually seems to have found writing
easy, but this notebook shows her grimly counting each chapter’s words.
Elsewhere,
however, the show’s attempt to address misconceptions about Christie serves
only to deepen the mystery. In a display of Christie’s passports, we see that
her profession is first stated as “author” — but that later on, at the height
of her writing success, she chose to describe herself as a “married woman.” In
her autobiography, Christie says that being a wife was her status and her
occupation, and that “as a sideline, I wrote books.” This self-effacement is as
baffling, in its way, as her shock over having written a successful play.
Agatha
Christie: A World of Mystery
Through June 20 at the British Library in London; events.bl.uk.
Thursday, 5 November 2026
Remembering ... Ten Dukes gathered together.
Wednesday, 4 November 2026
Prince Harry wants a reconciliation - but it won’t happen his way | The Royal T
In today’s
episode of The Royal T, Camilla Tominey and Hannah Furness speak to Arthur
Edwards, a royal photographer who has been following the British Royal Family
for the past 50 years, ahead of the release of his new book ‘Cup of Tea,
Arthur?: My Extraordinary 50 Years Photographing the Royal Family’. He runs
through some of his biggest photo scoops, including the first time he met and
photographed Diana, Princess of Wales, as well as his disagreements with then
Prince Charles, who Arthur says has “matured” over the years as he has taken
the throne. Arthur, who works as The Sun’s principle royal photographer for
over half a century, also explains why he thinks the Royal Family needs a
figure like Prince Harry, who he once considered the institution’s “star”, and
why Arthur believes reconciliation in the form the Duke of Sussex would like
it, won’t happen.
Cup of
Tea, Arthur?: My Extraordinary 50 Years Photographing the Royal Family, a must
have for 2026
by Arthur
Edwards (Author) Format: Kindle Edition
#1 Best
Seller
in
Celebrity Photography
'Arthur’s
experience in the role is unparalleled and this is a truly captivating memoir
of an extraordinary career, told by the man the royals themselves seek out in
the crowd.' Emily Nash.
‘Arthur
Edwards is one of the greatest newspaper photographers in history and a man
whose professionalism and charm have made him liked and respected by many
members of the royal family.’ Piers Morgan
After
half a century in the best job in the world, I have covered two hundred royal
tours in more than a hundred and twenty countries, photographed seven royal
weddings, five funerals, seven births, three Jubilees and a coronation.
For more
than fifty years, Arthur Edwards has been the definitive photographer of the
British royal family, capturing their most private and historic moments.
This
beautifully illustrated memoir traces Arthur's remarkable journey from growing
up as the son of a lorry driver in London’s East End, to earning the trust of
the Royal Family and becoming a close friend to King Charles and Queen Camilla.
Now,
Arthur tells his stories behind the photographs – revealing the moments he had
previously kept private, and the untold stories behind his remarkable access to
the most photographed family in the world.
They say
the harder you work, the luckier you get.
‘He’s a
very good photographer, a jolly good bloke and a very special person.’ King
Charles III
Tuesday, 3 November 2026
REMEMBERING 6 Nov 2024: Where is Lord Lucan? | Lucan | Official Trailer - BBC / Lucan review
Review
Lucan review
– stick with this wild documentary to the end and you will be astonished
Fifty years
ago, Lord Lucan murdered Sandra Rivett then disappeared. This surreal series
follows the victim’s son as he hunts down the fugitive peer – and ends up
somewhere totally unexpected
Rebecca
Nicholson
Wed 6 Nov
2024 22.00 GMT
https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2024/nov/06/lord-lucan-bbc-documentary-review
Richard John
Bingham, the 7th Earl of Lucan, was declared dead in 1999, but that did nothing
to halt the highly profitable cottage industry of speculation about him, which
has chugged away since 1974, when he murdered Sandra Rivett, his children’s
nanny, then disappeared.
At first
glance, you might think that this three-part documentary will be another
contribution to this conspiracy-minded canon. But this is not a “have we found
him?” film. I cannot emphasise enough how much it is worth sticking with it
until the end. What unspools is a sometimes tender, sometimes troubling
rollercoaster that ends up in surreal and unexpected territory. There is a fake
monk, catfishing, drag queens and Timothy Leary. You have probably not seen
this side of the Lord Lucan story before.
The first
episode is the most straightforward. The film-maker Colette Camden has found a
new way of outlining what happened on 7 November 1974. A builder in Hampshire
called Neil Berriman thinks he has tracked down Lucan, she explains. (There is
a strong argument that the true subject of the episodes is Berriman, not
Lucan.) Berriman’s mother, who had adopted him, would talk to him about a
“brown envelope” containing information about his biological parents. For
years, he wasn’t interested in even looking for it, but when he did eventually
open it, it delivered a shock: newspaper cuttings about one of Britain’s most
notorious crimes of the 20th century. It revealed that his birth mother was
Rivett, the woman who had been looking after Lucan’s children for mere weeks
when he bludgeoned her to death.
As you would
expect from a modern documentary, and one which involves Rivett’s son, this
shifts its emphasis from the headline-generating exploits of the “fugitive
Lord” – the profligate gambler and drunk, known to his friends, ironically, as
“Lucky” – to the 29-year-old woman whom he murdered, the justice he eluded and
the consequences of this violent crime for those left behind.
Berriman has
made it his mission to learn everything he can about the case – seemingly to
the concern of his family – and episode one provides an overview of what he has
discovered. There are interviews with people who knew Rivett, who knew Lucan,
who attended the crime scene; and with people who, like Berriman, have made the
investigation their primary focus (although without having the same personal
attachment).
It is here
that the series starts to rev up and speed off into the distance, where it
shape-shifts into something else entirely. Berriman has spent years working
with the investigative reporter Glen Campbell, who has reported on the case
extensively (and called his dog Lucan). They have pursued countless theories
and potential sightings. The film joins them as they are on their way to
confront a man they have tracked down in Australia, whom they seem certain is
the aristocrat.
To watch
this with a critical eye is to notice that we, the viewers, cannot see or hear
much of their evidence: a confidential police report that would compromise the
job of the person who leaked it; a detail given off‑camera by Lucan’s brother. There are a lot of people saying “bullshit”. Often, there is no clear sense of
what is true and what the people at the heart of this story want to believe.
(There is, however, a clear sense of how much some of these men will make
excuses for a friend who brutally murdered a woman – a small but deeply
depressing detail.)
It is not a
rigorous investigation so much as an empathic portrait of human obsession.
Camden is evidently fond of Berriman, and her involvement in the story grows
more pronounced as the episodes progress. I kept thinking of The Journalist and
the Murderer, Janet Malcolm’s classic study of journalistic ethics and the
relationship between reporter and subject, wondering to what extent this
documentary exists in a murky area. The programme gives Berriman (and, by
extension, Rivett) a voice – and it’s hard to deny that he deserves that voice.
By the time
Lucan explodes into its surreal final act, you will be feeling astonished and
uneasy about some of the people caught up in the whirlwind of pursuit. This
extraordinary documentary lingers in the mind and leaves a lot more questions
behind it than whether or not Lucan lived beyond 1974.
Lucan airs on BBC Two and is available on BBC
iPlayer
































