Sunday, 28 June 2026

The moment Harry gave up any chance of reconciliation with William


Prince Harry may cancel UK family visit after being refused police protection

Prince Harry is reconsidering his upcoming trip to the UK with Meghan Markle and their children after his request for taxpayer-funded police protection was rejected.

The family had planned a five-day visit to Britain in early July 2026 to attend events marking the "One Year to Go" countdown for the Invictus Games in Birmingham. They were also scheduled to stay at a royal residence as guests of King Charles III. However, the Royal and VIP Executive Committee (RAVEC) denied his application for state security during the trip.

 

Key Details of the Security Dispute

  • The Denial: RAVEC informed Prince Harry that his application for a state security package was denied shortly after details of the family trip were made public.
  • The Core Conflict: The Duke of Sussex has stated that he feels it is unsafe to bring his family to the UK without armed police protection. While the family would be safe inside royal residences, they will not receive taxpayer-funded protection when moving around Britain.
  • Private Security Limitations: A source close to the Sussexes stated that their private security team identified serious safety concerns. Private teams cannot replicate state-level protection or access local intelligence.
  • Potential Compromise: Insiders report that Prince Harry is currently looking at alternatives, which include flying his family into the UK for just a single day instead of five.
  • Legal Context: This dispute follows a string of legal defeats for the Duke. He previously lost a high-profile Court of Appeal challenge to fully reinstate his automatic, taxpayer-funded security, which was downgraded to a "case-by-case" basis after he stepped down as a working royal in 2020

 


"Tweedland" has reached 10.000.000 page views ! Thanks to you all ! Jeeves.




 

Saturday, 27 June 2026

Royals Have No Savings: Why MPs Approved £369m Palace Refurbishment | Baroness Margaret Hodge

The king, his millions, and the first public royal tax bill | The Latest

 

Now we know how much tax King Charles pays, and it is very little

 


Analysis

Now we know how much tax King Charles pays, and it is very little

Juliette Garside

The monarch’s declaration does not tell us much, except that his bill is lower than for people with much smaller fortunes

 

Fri 26 Jun 2026 18.23 BST

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/jun/26/now-we-know-how-much-tax-king-charles-pays-and-it-is-very-little

 

The veil of secrecy that surrounds the royal finances was nudged aside a little on Thursday to allow the release of a new piece of information. We learned for the first time how much the king’s annual tax bill comes to.

 

This was not a full tax return. It was a two-sentence declaration, stating his tax payable amounted to £12.9m in 2024-25, and a slightly smaller sum the year before. His total tax payable since accession comes to £30m.

 

It has been a long time coming. Unlike other citizens, the monarch is not liable for tax, but the king and his mother before him started paying it voluntarily in 1993.

 

The declaration was short on detail. We don’t know what his total income was for those years. We don’t know the total value of his private fortune. And we have no idea how much his tax bill was reduced by for expenses such as those incurred performing royal duties.

 

The small nugget of new information has brought to light one startling fact though. The king’s tax bill is low, even when compared with those who have smaller fortunes.

 

Thanks to painstaking investigations by the Guardian, in its 2023 cost of the crown series, the king’s private wealth, known as the privy purse, is estimated to be at least £1.8bn. This includes the Duchy of Lancaster estate – a £690m land and property portfolio handed from one monarch to the next and which provides him with income of £25m a year; and an even larger pile of other assets, such as cars, jewels, art and the private residences of Balmoral and Sandringham. We have very little idea how much the king holds in financial investments, or what the revenues from these are.

 

The tax the king pays covers all of the privy purse, all £1.8bn or more of assets.

 

Because we don’t know the total income, we are not able to check what the king’s effective tax rate is, but comparisons with other taxpayers raise questions.

 

A scan of this year’s Sunday Times tax list shows that the hedge fund boss Suneil Setiya, also estimated to be worth £1.8bn, paid £114m in annual tax. This is 10 times the sum the king paid in 2023-24.

 

The musician Ed Sheeran, whose fortune at £410m is a fraction of the king’s, paid £20m to HMRC. The author JK Rowling, worth an estimated £975m, was billed £47m on her earnings and gains.

 

Even the Manchester City footballer Erling Haaland, who is Norwegian, pays more than the king – his most recent tax bill was £17m.

 

Without more information about the size and shape of the privy purse, it is impossible to say why the king’s bill is so low.

 

What we do know is that the Duchy of Lancaster is not liable for the kinds of taxes that might be paid by a company or a trust. The capital gains made by buying and selling property, and the rents received from tenants, can all accumulate and be reinvested tax free, allowing the king’s wealth to grow more quickly than that of his subjects.

 

The privy purse could be described as operating like a mini-tax haven. The assets held by the duchy are untaxed, while the king’s other holdings are undeclared. The palace says the king voluntarily pays capital gains on his privately held wealth, and that the accounts are externally audited each year. They say this part of his personal holdings remains private, as for any other citizen. But no other citizen has such discretion over the tax they choose to pay.

 

The palace was approached for comment.