.jpg)
The Glamour Boys by Chris Bryant review – the
rebels who fought for Britain
The fascinating story of 10 courageous gay MPs who saw
clearly that war was inevitable and were prepared to take a stand against
appeasement
Simon
Callow
Fri 6 Nov
2020 07.30 GMT
In The
Glamour Boys, Chris Bryant sets out to bring to light the remarkable and in
some cases heroic contribution of gay MPs to Britain’s involvement in the
second world war. It is not an unknown story: five years ago Michael Bloch
covered it in his racy, rather tabloid Closet Queens. But Bryant, the Labour MP
for Rhondda, and gay himself – indeed something of a poster boy for the gay
cohort in today’s parliament – offers a much more detailed, infinitely more
complex, account of the 10 “queer, or nearly queer” members of parliament who
took an increasingly forthright stand against Neville Chamberlain’s policy of
appeasing the German, Italian and Spanish dictators of the interwar years,
risking their careers and in some cases losing their lives in battle. Bryant
makes large but not excessive claims for them: “Had it not been for the Glamour
Boys’ campaign against Chamberlain we would never have fought, let alone won,
the second world war.”
In fact,
“the 17-strong Glamour Boys”, as the anti-appeasement faction in the Commons
were nastily dubbed by Chamberlain, were by no means all gay, including as they
did Harold Macmillan, Anthony Eden, Duncan Sandys, Leo Amery and, of course,
Winston Churchill. Bryant’s queer group of 10 were Robert Boothby, Harold
Nicolson, Rob Bernays, Victor Cazalet, Harry Crookshank, Jack Macnamara, Ronnie
Cartland, Ronnie Tree, Philip Sassoon and Jim Thomas. This uncommonly talented
group were for the most part Conservatives, though in the unfathomably complex
party arrangements of the interwar years, at any one time they might sit with
National Liberal or National Labour members.
From the
moment Hitler came to power in 1933, the Glamour Boys saw clearly that war was
inevitable and, tentatively to begin with, then with increasing directness,
they said so, incurring the opprobrium both of their fellow parliamentarians
and of the heavily pro-appeasement press. Many of them had direct knowledge of
Germany; before the Nazis came to power and even after, the gay MPs, like many
other homosexual men, had made a beeline for Weimar Berlin – that “bugger’s
daydream”, as WH Auden put it – relishing a degree of sexual freedom
unimaginable in Britain.
Bryant
notes the courage of these men, not only in adopting an unpopular stance in
parliament, but in standing as MPs at a time when homosexuality was savagely
punished. A number of them were married, some bisexual “or somewhere in
between”, but all of them, if discovered having sex with another man, could
have found themselves brutally prosecuted. Worse even than the punishment was
the public obloquy: threatened with a court of inquiry in 1902, a lauded Boer
war hero, Major-General Sir Hector Macdonald, had chosen to kill himself.
Despite all
of this, gay men still managed to enjoy themselves, and each other. Bryant
paints a kaleidoscopic picture of the clandestine gay scene in the London of
the 1930s. The area around Piccadilly Circus was Queer Central – the Trocadero,
the Criterion Bar, the Lyons Corner House, the Jermyn Street Baths and clubs
such as Rendezvous where one could meet, in the evocative phrase of the actor
and writer Emlyn Williams, “well-behaved male trash”; there was even a gay
guide book (deliciously called For Your Convenience). But danger was ever
present, not least in the form of pretty policemen. Arrests were frequent, and
neither wealth nor class was any protection.
Bryant notes the courage of these men, in standing as
MPs at a time when homosexuality was savagely punished
Meanwhile,
the world was agog at the spectacular rise and fall of the homosexual Ernst
Röhm, scar-faced leader of the Sturmabteilung, the Nazi paramilitary wing. The
Night of the Long Knives, in which he and his cohorts were annihilated, quickly
confirmed the end of any semblance of sexual toleration; a new law,
criminalising the “promotion of homosexuality” (sound familiar?) was enacted.
Between 1933 and 1945, 100,000 gay men were arrested; from as early as 1929 the
party paper, the Völkischer Beobachter, had conflated homosexuality and
Judaism: one of the many “evil instincts” that characterised Jews, the paper
claimed, was that they tried to promote sexual relationships between siblings,
men and animals, and men and men. Such “perverted crimes”, the paper concluded,
should be punished by banishment or hanging.
These
developments were enthusiastically received in Britain. The Times demurely
welcomed the fact that “the Führer has started cleaning up”. That same year,
1934, Lord Rothermere’s Daily Mail came out for Oswald Mosley’s British Union
of Fascists: some of the staff even went to work in black shirts, while the
Sunday Pictorial ran a competition to find the nation’s prettiest female
fascist. Antisemitism was universal: when Bernays, whose great-grandfather had
been Jewish, stood for parliament, his campaign posters were plastered over
with stickers saying “JEW”. In the House of Commons, Robert Tatton Bower
bellowed at the London-born Labour MP Manny Shinwell: “Go back to Poland”. In a
debate, Sassoon was told by the Clydesider Labour MP David Kirkwood that he was
no Briton, but “a foreigner”.
Opposition
to government was tightly policed by Chamberlain’s master of dirty tricks, Sir
Joseph Ball, a key mover in forging and disseminating the Zinoviev letter,
which lost Labour the 1924 election. A deeply sinister figure, he fed the whips
gobbets of scandal, which they used to control potentially rebellious MPs; he
it was who masterminded Eden’s resignation as foreign secretary and then
ensured that it was downplayed in the papers. The gay Glamour Boys had to be
very careful. They were, as it happens, far from being inherently radical:
after being shown round Dachau in 1933, Cazalet wrote in his diary: “Great fun.
I visit the ‘Concentration Camp’. It was not very interesting. Quite well run,
no undue misery or discomfort.”
Typically
it was only when calamity befell someone of their acquaintance that their
personal feelings led to political action: Cazalet’s friend, the great German
tennis player Gottfried von Crammok, had an affair with the Jewish actor
Manasse Herbstok, and they both seemed imperilled, so Cazalet leapt into
action, very effectively. Likewise Nicolson managed to intervene on behalf of
the German translator of the books of his wife, Vita Sackville-West. From these
experiences they learned which way the wind was blowing, and quite how savage
and unrelenting that wind was.
The area around Piccadilly Circus was Queer Central,
but danger was ever present, not least in the form of pretty policemen
They all,
to a greater or lesser degree, piled pressure on the government, who in the
face of Hitler’s blatant war-mongering finally had to concede that he could be
appeased no longer. A number of the 10 – Macnamara and Cartland in particular –
fought and died bravely; Bernays’s plane was lost in action, and Cazalet perished
flying with the Polish prime minister in exile, Wladyslaw Sikorski, in still
mysterious circumstances. They are commemorated in a carved memorial behind the
Speaker’s chair in parliament, but, as Bryant observes, they are largely
unknown.
Not any
longer, it is to be hoped: he has done them honour, reminding the world that
gay people are every bit as various as heterosexuals. He has handled the
difficult form of group biography skilfully, using a great deal of never before
published material, and introducing us to a number of little known figures,
notably Cartland and the gallant and dashing Macnamara. The one thing Bryant is
unable to explore is the intimate lives of these people, because they avoided
at all costs confiding their emotional and indeed carnal experiences to paper,
so neither letters nor diaries give us even glimpses of their deepest feelings.
There is a
rare light-hearted section of the book. Cazalet was tasked with recruiting for
the 83rd Light Anti-aircraft Battery, with 10 officers and ranks. He
interviewed and recruited many of the men personally – often at the Ritz or the
Dorchester. Nicolson’s son, the art historian Benedict, one of many gay
recruits, said of it that “it’s so civilised, friendly, incompetent”. Cazalet inspected
the men every week, sent his regards to their parents or lovers, and chatted
with everyone before getting back into his Rolls-Royce, saying: “I have to
hurry. I’m having tea with Queen Mary.” Unsurprisingly, the battery acquired a
reputation. Some called it “the Monstrous Regiment of Gentlemen”, others “a
sissy AA battery”, and Philip Toynbee was keen to join because “it led to all
sorts of ‘amusing things, such as well-known pansies mincing into the Café
Royal in battle-dress’,” but was prevented by his father-in-law from joining
what the old gent described as “a bugger’s battery”. Delicious stuff. Needless
to say, when it came to actual combat, they fought like lions.
.webp)
No comments:
Post a Comment