Saturday, 7 January 2023
Friday, 6 January 2023
35 Savile Row - EDWARD SEXTON
https://www.edwardsexton.co.uk/pages/35-savile-row
Located at
No.35 Savile Row, our new store is just a few doors down from the legendary
Nutter’s shop, and represents a poignant homecoming. No.35 isn’t quite as
provocative as the original Nutter’s of Savile Row store, but it does offer a
unique experience on the Row.
Designed by
friend of the house, interior designer Daniel Hopwood, No.35 is a contemporary
ode to the craft of tailoring. The space is finished with striking touches that
speak to Edward Sexton’s rebellious, yet elegant design philosophy. Subtle Art
Deco and 1970s details reflect the two eras that we find most inspiring, from
the metallic angle-poise lighting, to the decadent central marble island. The
island forms a centre-piece in the shop and evokes a familiar, bar-like feel
for clients to gather round and socialise. Of course, it also doubles as a
tailor’s cutting table. Two fitting rooms are separated by plush navy velvet
brocade curtains, finished with standing mirrors and carefully curated
midcentury furniture.
ES MAGAZINE
MY LONDON: EDWARD SEXTON
The Savile Row legend gets his shoes from Gaziano
Girling, finds spiritual answers at Brompton Oratory and would be happy to
dress the King
BY SORAYA
GAIED CHORTANE
15 DECEMBER
2022
Home is…
Here in my
cutting room on Savile Row. I live in Surrey and grew up in Dagenham.
What was
your first job? I had an uncle who worked as a dressmaker and every holiday I’d
deliver trousers to the shops we were working with. Creating has always been in
the blood.
First
memory of London?
When I
first came to London, I hated it. I moved when I was 10 from the country-side,
with big open cornfields. Moving into the city with tower blocks was a change.
Where do
you go to let your hair down?
You know,
I’ve done my fair share of letting my hair down all over the world. From Studio
54 to [Kensington nightclub] Yours or Mine, it was mind-blowing. I was in my
30s, travelling for my own company, going to see my clients in restaurants.
Now, I blow off steam in my garden and I think it is the best for everyone that
I don’t get too excited.
Which shops
do you rely on?
I like
Gaziano Girling very much for the most elegant and comfortable shoes. They tend
to go well with my suits.
Best dinner
you’ve had out?
I’ve been
to all the top restaurants but I’d rather have a good fish and chips on the
Brighton seafront at The Regency. It’s the best when you’re sitting and the sun
is shining in the evening — you could be anywhere in the world.
Where would
you recommend for a first date?
Well, in my
time we would go dancing at The Lyceum. We would start the evening there, then
around 10.30 we’d find a local inexpensive restaurant and then get the bus
home. The money and technology just wasn’t there to do extravagant things, but
dancing is dancing.
What would
you do if you were Mayor for the day?
I would get
rid of these electric scooters and bikes on the roads. They are so frightening
and dangerous. When I drive over Putney Bridge it’s like the Tour de France!
The first
guy I saw wearing a suit with trainers was Paul McCartney and I thought that’s
really cool
What do you
collect?
I collect
years! I’m sentimental about people and feelings, but not objects. I even throw
away the celebrity pattern bags, I don’t keep them for the archives. You’re
only as good as your next job so it doesn’t matter about the pattern you made
30 years ago. I’m not starstruck about celebrities. If you brought me in King
Charles today, obviously I’d be very flattered, but at the end of the day I’ve
got a huge responsibility to dress him perfectly.
What’s your
idea of elegance?
Being natural
is elegant, someone savvy who tries different things, like a suit with
trainers. The first guy I saw doing that was Paul McCartney and I thought,
that’s really cool.
Biggest
extravagance?
I would say
it is my new studio and shop. I’ve taken this beautiful building for my
workshop because I want to be close to my tailors and where my garments are
being made.
What’s your
London secret?
Brompton
Oratory. I’m quite religious even in my flying years! You don’t have to say set
prayers, you can just be in the building and sometimes answers come.
Do you have
a mantra?
My father
told me years ago, once you’ve learnt your trade, you’re always your own
master. You can pick up your tools and work elsewhere. That stuck with me.
Edward
Sexton has just opened his new flagship store and studio at 35 Savile Row, W1
(edwardsexton.co.uk)
Thursday, 5 January 2023
SPARE : Prince Harry details physical attack by brother William in new book
Prince Harry details physical attack by brother
William in new book
Exclusive: Harry writes in new autobiography Spare
that William ‘knocked me to the floor’ during confrontation in London in 2019
Harry and William in London in September, following
the death of the Queen. The Guardian obtained a copy of Harry’s autobiography.
Martin
Pengelly in New York
@MartinPengelly
Thu 5 Jan
2023 00.03 GMT
In his
highly anticipated autobiography, Spare, Prince Harry recounts what he says was
a physical attack by his brother, William, now Prince of Wales, as their
relationship fell apart over the younger prince’s marriage to the actor Meghan
Markle.
Describing
a confrontation at his London home in 2019, Harry says William called Meghan
“difficult”, “rude” and “abrasive”, which Harry calls a “parrot[ing of] the
press narrative” about his American wife.
The
confrontation escalated, Harry writes, until William “grabbed me by the collar,
ripping my necklace, and … knocked me to the floor”.
The
extraordinary scene, which Harry says resulted in visible injury to his back,
is one of many in Spare, which will be published worldwide next week and is
likely to spark a serious furore for the British royal family.
Amid stringent pre-launch security around the book,
the Guardian obtained a copy.
The book’s
title comes from an old saying in royal and aristocratic circles: that a first
son is an heir to titles, power and fortune, and a second is therefore a spare,
should anything happen to the first-born.
Spare is a
remarkable volume, in which the altercation between the two princes forms a
startling passage.
Harry
writes that William wanted to talk about “the whole rolling catastrophe” of
their relationship and struggles with the press. But when William arrived at
Nottingham Cottage – where Harry was then living, in the grounds of Kensington
Palace and known as “Nott Cott” – he was, Harry says, already “piping hot”.
After
William complained about Meghan, Harry writes, Harry told him he was repeating
the press narrative and that he expected better. But William, Harry says, was
not being rational, leading to the two men shouting over each other.
Harry then
accused his brother of acting like an heir, unable to understand why his
younger brother was not content to be a spare.
Kate,
William, Harry and Meghan at Windsor Castle in September following the death of
the Queen.
Kate,
William, Harry and Meghan at Windsor Castle in September following the death of
the Queen. Photograph: Kirsty O’Connor/AFP/Getty Images
Insults
were exchanged, before William claimed he was trying to help.
Harry said:
“Are you serious? Help me? Sorry – is that what you call this? Helping me?”
That
comment, Harry says, angered his brother, who swore while stepping towards him.
Now scared, Harry writes, he went to the kitchen, his furious brother
following.
Harry
writes that he gave his brother a glass of water and said: “Willy, I can’t
speak to you when you’re like this.”
He writes:
“He set down the water, called me another name, then came at me. It all
happened so fast. So very fast. He grabbed me by the collar, ripping my
necklace, and he knocked me to the floor. I landed on the dog’s bowl, which
cracked under my back, the pieces cutting into me. I lay there for a moment,
dazed, then got to my feet and told him to get out.”
Harry
writes that William urged him to hit back, citing fights they had as children.
Harry says he refused to do so. William left, Harry says, then returned
“looking regretful, and apologised”.
When
William left again, his brother writes, he “turned and called back: ‘You don’t
need to tell Meg about this.’
“‘You mean
that you attacked me?’
“‘I didn’t attack
you, Harold.’”
Harry says
he didn’t immediately tell his wife – but did call his therapist.
When Meghan
later noticed “scrapes and bruises” on his back, and he therefore told her of
the attack, Harry says she “wasn’t that surprised, and wasn’t all that angry.
“She was
terribly sad.”
Harry’s
resentment of being the “spare” is the unifying theme of his book, through
chapters on his childhood, his schooling, his career as a royal and in the
British army, his relationship with his parents and brother and his life with
Meghan through courtship, wedding and marriage to their own experience of
parenthood.
Early on,
Harry recounts the story of how his father, now King Charles, supposedly said
to his wife, Princess Diana, on the day of Harry’s birth: “Wonderful! Now
you’ve given me an heir and a spare – my work is done.”
Whether
describing his memories and love for Diana, who was killed in a car crash in
Paris in August 1997, or his similar love for his grandmother, Queen Elizabeth
II, who died last year, Harry is unsparing in his recounting of intensely
private scenes and conversations.
Harry met
Meghan in 2016. They married at Windsor Castle in 2018. As Duke and Duchess of
Sussex, they began life as working royals but quickly drifted apart from the
family and eventually embarked on a largely separate existence, moving to
Canada and then California.
Their
acrimonious split from the royal family has been the subject of endless press
coverage, some of it steered themselves, including via a famous interview with
Oprah Winfrey in 2021 that caused huge controversy on both sides of the
Atlantic and around the world.
Subjects
from that interview and a recently released Netflix documentary, including a
miscarriage suffered by Meghan and her thoughts of suicide, and suggestions of
racism within royal circles, are covered extensively in Harry’s book.
The book
has been trailed and two interviews with Harry are due to be broadcast in the
UK and US this weekend, with ITV News at Ten and CBS 60 Minutes. Both
interviews are eagerly awaited, trailers and teasers reported on as news as
speculation about what Harry has chosen to say in his book continues.
In a clip
from the ITV interview, Harry said: “I would like to get my father back, I
would like to have my brother back.”
Given the
details recounted in his book, that might not seem immediately likely. Indeed
one of Harry’s most pertinent revelations of private conversations between the
senior royals comes from the very front of his book.
Harry
recounts an anguished meeting with Charles and William after the Windsor Castle
funeral of Prince Phillip, the queen’s husband, in April 2021.
Charles, he
says, stood between his warring sons, “looking up at our flushed faces”.
“Please,
boys,” Harry quotes his father as saying. “Don’t make my final years a misery.”
Wednesday, 4 January 2023
Oh NO ! Another ‘Bridgeton’ version of a classic novel !?! / Dangerous Liaisons | Official Trailer | STARZ
“You’re better off thinking of it as Bridgeton in
France. Gossip Girl in powdered wigs. Game of Thrones in silks, slaying only
reputations. Which is to say: park your brain at the door and enjoy the ride.”
Review
Dangerous Liaisons review – a classic novel becomes
Gossip Girl in powdered wigs
Yes, the script for this adaptation of Choderlos de
Laclos’ book is terrible. Sure, the French accents are ropey. Never mind – park
your brain at the door and enjoy the ride
Lucy Mangan
@LucyMangan
Sun 6 Nov 2022 09.00 GMT
Put aside Choderlos de Laclos’ novel. Forget
the magisterial 1988 film version starring Glenn Close and John Malkovich. The
new eight-part Starz adaptation of Dangerous Liaisons (Prime Video) is billed
as the origin story of the marquise de Merteuil and vicomte de Valmont we know
and love-hate. You’re better off thinking of it as Bridgerton in France. Gossip
Girl in powdered wigs. Game of Thrones in silks, slaying only reputations.
Which is to say: park your brain at the door and enjoy the ride.
We are in Paris, 1793. Les peasants are revolteeng,
but Camille (Alice Englert) and Pascal (Nicholas Denton) are young and in love
and care nothing for the scent of revolution in the air, nor the terrible
script they have been tasked with delivering. Nor for any kind of French
accent. Englert in fact seems to be aggressively Englishing hers instead, which
does make it hard to understand on occasion. “Take me somewhaa I’m not
paaaaawh!” she says breathlessly to Pascal. When he spins a dreamy yarn about
how that might be accomplished, she slightly unfairly asks, “Have you forgotten
my dat?” This, it transpires, means “debt”. Camille (the marquise de
Merteuil-to-be) is a courtesan in hock to her madam. Pascal (the vicomte de
Valmont come the day) is a mapmaker with a side hustle in seducing rich, titled
ladies in the hope of being rewarded with riches and a title.
One of his ladies is the current marquise de Merteuil,
Genevieve (Lesley Manville, somehow grounding the show while soaring above it
all), who has foolishly poured her heart out in letters to him (this is ye
olden days’ equivalent of sending nudes, children) and now wants them back. Hmm
– oui mais non, says her stripling lover. Alors, says the marquise, and carries
on sleeping with him while she works out what to do.
The answer comes when Camille’s friend Victoire (Kosar
Ali) – no great fan of le petit mapmaker – steals the letters from him and
Camille discovers that Pascal has been playing hide the saucisson not just with
Genevieve but several others, too. They take them to the marquise and trade
them for an introduction to high society. Genevieve, heartbroken about her
lover’s betrayal, steps through the stages of grief and arrives rapidly at the
lesser-known sixth stage: Massive and Ongoing Vengeance. She begins training
Camille out of the ways of the cheap courtesan and into the ways of trading sex
for palaces rather than centimes. Camille’s glow-up begins with a Pretty
Woman-esque wardrobe fitting and trip to the opera, where Genevieve takes a
minute out of her busy bewigging schedule to kick Pascal in the virtual
noisettes and send him on his way.
Pascal, meanwhile, has only his penis to work with.
From second-tier project Florence de Regnier (gloriously played with a
fibrillating edge of madness by Paloma Faith) he gets a gold clock, which won’t
do.
Because they are not yet their fully poisonous adult
selves, Pascal is keen to get back into Camille’s good graces, which – for …
reasons – requires seducing the look-how-pious-I-am Jacqueline de Montrachet
(Carice Van Houten), and eliciting epistolary proof after the fact.
From there, it’s just a roiling sea of absurdity. Scam
builds upon scam, scandale follows scandale and everybody – except the rightly
exasperated Victoire – has a whale of a time. Including the viewer, despite (or
perhaps, morally corrupt horrors that we are too, because of) some atrocious
dialogue and a liberal scattering of terrible performances.
For all that it is about love, sex and the deceits
that come with it, this Dangerous Liaisons resists becoming encumbered by any
deeper messages about the damage people are willing to do to each other to get
ahead. It’s about watching Camille learn the manipulative ropes from a mistress
of them and seeing how far she can get on her wits alone. This can get a touch
repetitive – you might need to do an episode or two at a time rather than
binge-watch the lot – but that’s the common weakness of all but the most
riotous escapist fare.
In short, give up, kick back, relax and enjoy. Clear
your mind of any thoughts of how Pierre C de L must be spinning in his grave.
Resistance to the accumulating absurdities is useless. As a wise, if endlessly
malevolent man once almost said: it’s beyond your control.
Tuesday, 3 January 2023
'I want my father and brother back': ITV releases trailer for interview with Prince Harry
Prince Harry: I would like my father and my
brother back
Duke of Sussex tells ITV ‘it never needed to be this
way’ and that ‘I want a family, not an institution’
Miranda
Bryant
Mon 2 Jan
2023 15.46 GMT
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/jan/02/prince-harry-would-like-father-brother-back-itv
The Duke of
Sussex has said he wants his father and brother “back” during an ITV interview
due to be broadcast on Sunday, two days before the publication of his highly
anticipated memoir.
The latest
intervention by Prince Harry, expected to again rock Buckingham Palace with
revelations of its inner workings, is one of two interviews to be broadcast on
the same day either side of the Atlantic. In the other interview, with a US
broadcaster, he accuses the palace of failing to protect his family in the same
way as other royal family members.
The prince
says “I would like to get my father back, I would like to have my brother back”
in a preview clip from the interview with the ITV News at Ten presenter Tom
Bradby.
The
90-minute programme, produced by ITN Productions for ITV, will be broadcast two
days before Harry’s autobiography, Spare, is published on 10 January.
In a series
of clips cut together with no questions heard, Harry says “it never needed to
be this way” and refers to “the leaking and the planting”, before adding: “I
want a family, not an institution.”
He also
says “they feel as though it is better to keep us somehow as the villains” and
that “they have shown absolutely no willingness to reconcile”, although it is
unclear to whom he is referring.
Filmed in
California where Harry lives with this wife, Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex and
their two children, the interview will go into “unprecedented depth and detail”
about his life in and outside the royal family, ITV said.
Bradby, who
has known Harry for more than 20 years, was also behind the interview during
the couple’s 2019 southern Africa trip, when he asked Meghan about the impact
of the pressure she was under during an ITV documentary.
In comments
that became an early public signal that the couple were struggling under the
intense media spotlight, she said: “Thank you for asking because not many
people have asked if I’m OK, but it’s a very real thing to be going through
behind the scenes.”
In a
separate interview, to be broadcast on US television, Harry told the 60 Minutes
programme on CBS News that “silence is betrayal” while talking about the
alleged failure of Buckingham Palace to defend him and the Duchess of Sussex
before they stepped down as senior royals.
In a clip
from the interview, to be broadcast on Sunday, Harry tells the journalist
Anderson Cooper: “Every single time I’ve tried to do it privately, there have
been briefings and leakings and planting of stories against me and my wife.”
“The family
motto is ‘never complain, never explain’, but it’s just a motto,” he added.
“[Buckingham Palace] will feed or have a conversation with a correspondent, and
that correspondent will literally be spoon-fed information and write the story,
and at the bottom of it, they will say they have reached out to Buckingham
Palace for comment. But the whole story is Buckingham Palace commenting.
“So when
we’re being told for the past six years, ‘we can’t put a statement out to
protect you’, but you do it for other members of the family, there becomes a
point when silence is betrayal.”
Buckingham
Palace said it would not be commenting on either trailer.
Harry has
previously said that Spare is written “not as the prince I was born but as the
man I have become”. It will include “the highs and lows, the mistakes, the
lessons learned”, he has said, promising it will be a “first-hand account of my
life that’s accurate and wholly truthful”.
The book’s
publisher, Penguin, described the memoir as “intimate and heartfelt” and
“written with raw, unflinching honesty”.
Promotional
materials say Harry will write for the first time about walking with William
behind their mother’s coffin and include details of his time in the military in
Afghanistan, and Meghan and Harry’s home life.
An
audiobook, read by Harry, will also be released on the same day.
The
interview comes weeks after the release of the six-part Netflix documentary
Harry & Meghan in December, which broke viewing records at the streaming
service and divided viewers with its explosive details.
The series,
directed by Liz Garbus, included personal footage shot by the couple and their
accounts of their heartbreak over wars with the palace, claims of Prince
William shouting at his brother and briefing against them and the stresses over
privacy action against the Mail on Sunday, which they believe led to them
miscarrying.
Last month,
the Sun was forced to apologise after publishing a column by Jeremy Clarkson in
which he said he “hated” Meghan “on a cellular level”.
The article
rapidly attracted widespread criticism and became the Independent Press
Standard’s Organisation’s most complained about article. It was later removed
from the Sun’s website at Clarkson’s request.
A
spokesperson for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex said the apology was “nothing
more than a PR stunt”.


.webp)
.jpg)

.jpg)