Saturday, 13 March 2021


 Computer model of how the Antikythera mechanism may have worked. Photograph: UCL


Scientists may have solved ancient mystery of 'first computer'

 

Researchers claim breakthrough in study of 2,000-year-old Antikythera mechanism, an astronomical calculator found in sea

 

Ian Sample Science editor

@iansample

Fri 12 Mar 2021 10.00 GMT

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2021/mar/12/scientists-move-closer-to-solving-mystery-of-antikythera-mechanism

 

From the moment it was discovered more than a century ago, scholars have puzzled over the Antikythera mechanism, a remarkable and baffling astronomical calculator that survives from the ancient world.

 

The hand-powered, 2,000-year-old device displayed the motion of the universe, predicting the movement of the five known planets, the phases of the moon and the solar and lunar eclipses. But quite how it achieved such impressive feats has proved fiendishly hard to untangle.

 

Now researchers at UCL believe they have solved the mystery – at least in part – and have set about reconstructing the device, gearwheels and all, to test whether their proposal works. If they can build a replica with modern machinery, they aim to do the same with techniques from antiquity.

 

“We believe that our reconstruction fits all the evidence that scientists have gleaned from the extant remains to date,” said Adam Wojcik, a materials scientist at UCL. While other scholars have made reconstructions in the past, the fact that two-thirds of the mechanism are missing has made it hard to know for sure how it worked.

 

The mechanism, often described as the world’s first analogue computer, was found by sponge divers in 1901 amid a haul of treasures salvaged from a merchant ship that met with disaster off the Greek island of Antikythera. The ship is believed to have foundered in a storm in the first century BC as it passed between Crete and the Peloponnese en route to Rome from Asia Minor.

 


The Antikythera mechanism

The Antikythera mechanism is estimated to date back to around 80 BC. Photograph: X-Tek Group/AFP

 

The battered fragments of corroded brass were barely noticed at first, but decades of scholarly work have revealed the object to be a masterpiece of mechanical engineering. Originally encased in a wooden box one foot tall, the mechanism was covered in inscriptions – a built-in user’s manual – and contained more than 30 bronze gearwheels connected to dials and pointers. Turn the handle and the heavens, as known to the Greeks, swung into motion.

 

Michael Wright, a former curator of mechanical engineering at the Science Museum in London, pieced together much of how the mechanism operated and built a working replica, but researchers have never had a complete understanding of how the device functioned. Their efforts have not been helped by the remnants surviving in 82 separate fragments, making the task of rebuilding it equivalent to solving a battered 3D puzzle that has most of its pieces missing.

 

Writing in the journal Scientific Reports, the UCL team describe how they drew on the work of Wright and others, and used inscriptions on the mechanism and a mathematical method described by the ancient Greek philosopher Parmenides, to work out new gear arrangements that would move the planets and other bodies in the correct way. The solution allows nearly all of the mechanism’s gearwheels to fit within a space only 25mm deep.

 

According to the team, the mechanism may have displayed the movement of the sun, moon and the planets Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn on concentric rings. Because the device assumed that the sun and planets revolved around Earth, their paths were far more difficult to reproduce with gearwheels than if the sun was placed at the centre. Another change the scientists propose is a double-ended pointer they call a “Dragon Hand” that indicates when eclipses are due to happen.

 

Computer model of the mechanism’s gears. Photograph: UCL

 

The researchers believe the work brings them closer to a true understanding of how the Antikythera device displayed the heavens, but it is not clear whether the design is correct or could have been built with ancient manufacturing techniques. The concentric rings that make up the display would need to rotate on a set of nested, hollow axles, but without a lathe to shape the metal, it is unclear how the ancient Greeks would have manufactured such components.

 

“The concentric tubes at the core of the planetarium are where my faith in Greek tech falters, and where the model might also falter,” said Wojcik. “Lathes would be the way today, but we can’t assume they had those for metal.”

 

Whether or not the model works, more mysteries remain. It is unclear whether the Antikythera mechanism was a toy, a teaching tool or had some other purpose. And if the ancient Greeks were capable of such mechanical devices, what else did they do with the knowledge?

 

“Although metal is precious, and so would have been recycled, it is odd that nothing remotely similar has been found or dug up,” Wojcik said. “If they had the tech to make the Antikythera mechanism, why did they not extend this tech to devising other machines, such as clocks?”

Friday, 12 March 2021

Pooh and the Philosophers by John Tyerman Williams

 




Pooh and the Philosophers is a 1995 book by John Tyerman Williams, purporting to show how all of Western philosophy from the last 3,000 years was a long preparation for Winnie the Pooh. It was published in 1995 by Dutton in the United States and by Methuen in the United Kingdom, using A. A. Milne's fictional bear Winnie-the-Pooh, and is both humorous and intellectual.

                                                              --------------------------

“I don’t know how an austere scholar of philosophy might react to “Pooh and the Philosophers” by John Tyerman Williams, but this is an enjoyable volume for the lay reader. Dr Williams has delved into the minutiae of the Pooh books and derived interpretations, metaphors, allegories that can be considered absurdly brilliant or brilliantly absurd, depending on your point of view. He has an incredible felicity with words and the sometimes serious, sometimes flippant style of writing in the first half initially had me wondering how serious he actually was in his asseverations, some of which seem a bit far-fetched. (Interestingly, the dedication at the beginning of the volume states that the book is the result of a casual joke).

 

The second half of the book veers towards more of a serious tone though still with touches of humour. It does become a bit repetitive, however, because the author frequently goes over the same excerpts from the text for the various philosophers instead of giving readers a wider selection of examples from different chapters. Drawback notwithstanding, the way Dr Williams links Pooh and company to Socrates, Plato, Milton, Aristotle, Stoicism, Epicureanism​, Descartes, Leibniz, Spinoza, Hobbes, Alexander, Locke, Berkeley, Hume, Mill, Russell, Ayer, Popper, Wittgenstein, Kant, Hegel, Nietzsche, Marcel, Heidegger, Sartre, and Camus is quite fascinating, instructive, and amusing, and it certainly kept me entertained for a day!”

Date: 18 Feb 2019

 Shivani Adib / https://shivaniadib.wordpress.com/2019/02/18/book-review-pooh-and-the-philosophers/

Wednesday, 10 March 2021

The curious british regimental tie zig zag stripes royal artillery and fleet air army


 




british regimental tie zig zag stripes royal artillery and fleet air army

 

In Britain, regimental stripes have been continuously used in tie designs at least since the 1920s. In Commonwealth countries, necktie stripes run from the left shoulder down to the right side. In Commonwealth countries, only people affiliated with a regiment (or university, school or organisation) should wear a necktie affiliated with that regiment. When Brooks Brothers introduced similar striped ties in the United States around the beginning of the 20th century, they had their stripes run from the right shoulder to the left side, in part to distinguish them from British regimental striped neckties.

 



A British Tradition

Regimental ties are woven deeply into British heritage. Following an existing trend of striped ties, the Regimental accessory was born within the military environment. The specific colours, stripes and width would be worn by each member of a brigade with an identifiable pride and unity. When the military action came to a close and there was a time of peace, people continued to wear their regimental ties, it was this which went on to be a pivotal point in establishing the ties as an elegant British tradition around the world.

A Royal Influence On Fashion

In the early 20th century, the Prince of Wales (to briefly become King Edward VIII before abdicating) made his first official visit to America, which unbeknown to him would change how regimental ties were being worn and by whom. American journalists were fascinated with the Prince’s attire, especially his chosen tie on that trip. After reporting heavily on the red and blue striped accessory that represented the Grenadier Guards regiment that he’d served during the war, the fashion of regimental ties rocketed.

Tie Etiquette

The colours of the stripes and the direction of the stripe represent the wearer’s membership to a military regiment, although this has evolved to belonging to prestigious clubs or Universities such as Oxford or Cambridge. The bespoke element of the tie design is there to provide a clear identity to these groups and it is believed that wearing a tie with the custom colours of an institution you’re not affiliated would be considered offensive.

Hayley Bonnick

Feb 22, 2018·

https://medium.com/@hbonnickwt/everything-you-should-know-about-regimental-ties-9079c8871928


GMB Discuss Prince Harry & Meghan's Bombshell Oprah Interview | Good Morning Britain

Tuesday, 9 March 2021

Piers Morgan leaves Good Morning Britain, ITV says in wake of Meghan and Harry comments // Piers Morgan stands by Meghan criticism after Good Morning Britain exit


Piers Morgan to leave Good Morning Britain following Meghan Markle row

Tuesday 9 March 2021, 7:34pm

https://www.itv.com/news/2021-03-09/piers-morgan-to-leave-good-morning-britain-following-meghan-markle-row

 

ITV News reporter Martha Fairlie has the latest on the development

 

Piers Morgan has left his role as a presenter on Good Morning Britain, ITV has announced.

 

The announcement comes after broadcasting regulator Ofcom launched an investigation after it received more than 41,000 complaints regarding comment made by the presenter following Harry and Meghan's interview with Oprah Winfrey.

 

In a statement, the broadcaster said: "Following discussions with ITV, Piers Morgan has decided now is the time to leave Good Morning Britain.

 

"ITV has accepted this decision and has nothing further to add."

 

The Duchess of Sussex opened up about her suicidal thoughts during her time in the Royal Family in a deeply personal and explosive interview with Oprah Winfrey. Meghan said she got to the stage where she “just didn’t want to be alive anymore.”

 

After the clip aired, Morgan said during Monday’s programme: “I’m sorry, I don’t believe a word she says.

 

Piers Morgan storms off Good Morning Britain following heated discussion with co-presenter Alex Beresford

 

“I wouldn’t believe her if she read me a weather report.”

 

An Ofcom spokesperson said: “We have launched an investigation into Monday’s episode of Good Morning Britain under our harm and offence rules.”

 

During Tuesday’s programme, Morgan addressed his comments about Meghan’s mental health.

 

He said: “When we talked about this yesterday, I said as an all-encompassing thing I don’t believe what Meghan Markle is saying generally in this interview, and I still have serious concerns about the veracity of a lot of what she said.

 

“But let me just state on the record my position about mental illness and on suicide. These are clearly extremely serious things that should be taken extremely seriously, and if someone is feeling that way they should get the treatment and help they need every time."

 

 

Morgan also stormed off set on Tuesday after co-presenter Alex Beresford branded his behaviour "diabolical" following his controversial remarks.

 

Speaking about the death of Diana, the 55-year-old former newspaper editor said Harry "couldn't let it go", but "William went through the same thing and he's managed to come to terms with the media and he works with the media".

 

Weather presenter Beresford then interjected and said the Royal couple had "had an overwhelming amount of negative press".

 

"There was bad press around the engagement... and everything that has followed since."

 

He added this had "been incredibly damaging, quite clearly, to Meghan’s mental health and also to Harry...

 

“And I hear Piers say William has gone through the same thing but, do you know what, siblings experience tragedy in their life and one will be absolutely fine and brush it off and the other will not be able to deal with it so strongly and that is clearly what has happened with Harry in this situation.

 

Meghan tells Oprah about “concerns and conversations' about Archie's skin colour

 

“He walked behind his mother’s coffin at a tender, tender age in front of the globe. That is going to shape a young boy for the rest of his life, so I think we all need to take a step back, and I understand that you don’t like Meghan Markle, you’ve made it so clear a number of times on this programme…”

 

“And I understand you’ve got a personal relationship with Meghan Markle or had one and she cut you off.

 

"She’s entitled to cut you off if she wants to. Has she said anything about you since she cut you off?

 

"I don’t think she has but yet you continue to trash her…”

 

Morgan then stood up and said: “OK, I’m done with this” and walked off set, saying: “Sorry, no… sorry, can’t do this…” as he stormed off set as Beresford called his actions "diabolical behaviour".

 

Oprah With Meghan and Harry is available to watch on demand on ITV Hub for viewers in the UK.


Piers Morgan stands by Meghan criticism after Good Morning Britain exit

10-3-2021

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-56343768

 

Piers Morgan has said he stands by his criticism of the Duchess of Sussex as ITV's Good Morning Britain airs for the first time since his departure.

 

It was announced on Tuesday that Morgan would leave the show after saying he "didn't believe a word" Meghan said in her interview with Oprah Winfrey.

 

Addressing his exit, co-host Susanna Reid said she had disagreed with his comments - and added: "Shows go on."

 

Ofcom is investigating his comments after receiving 41,000 complaints.

 

It is not yet certain who will replace Morgan on the GMB sofa and Ranvir Singh, who was sitting in his chair on Wednesday, said: "We don't call him Marmite for nothing."

 

In a tweet earlier, as the programme was beginning, Morgan said: "On Monday, I said I didn't believe Meghan Markle in her Oprah interview. I've had time to reflect on this opinion, and I still don't."

 

He added: "Freedom of speech is a hill I'm happy to die on."

 

On Tuesday, before leaving the show, Morgan stormed off set after a discussion with his colleague Alex Beresford over the duchess.

 

Piers Morgan leaves GMB after Meghan complaints

An emotional Reid told viewers there are "many voices" on GMB and "everyone has their say", adding that "some of you may cheer and others may boo" Morgan's departure.

 

"He has been my presenting partner, Monday to Wednesday, for more than five years and during Brexit and the pandemic and other issues, he has been a voice for many of you and a voice that many of you have railed against," she said.

 

"It is certainly going to be very different but shows go on and so on we go."

 

Singh added that Morgan was a "big character" and acknowledged that many viewers would be "gutted".

 

On Monday's programme, Morgan said he did not believe a word the duchess had said to Winfrey about her mental health during the headline-making interview, first aired in the US on Sunday.

 

He also said: "The fact that she's fired up this onslaught against our Royal Family I think is contemptible."

 

A total of 41,015 complaints were made to media watchdog Ofcom by 14:00 GMT on Tuesday, the second highest number of complaints in Ofcom's 17-year history.

 

On Tuesday, ITV chief executive Dame Carolyn McCall said she "completely believed what [the duchess] says", adding that ITV is "totally committed to" mental health.

 

Mental health charity Mind, which is a partner with ITV on its Britain Get Talking campaign, also criticised Morgan, saying it was "disappointed" by the presenter's comments.


Piers and Alex Clash Over Prince Harry and Meghan’s Accusations of Racism | Good Morning Britain


Piers Morgan storms off set of Good Morning Britain in Meghan row

ITV co-host calls presenter’s behaviour towards Duchess of Sussex ‘pathetic’ and ‘diabolical’

Morgan later returned to the set and the discussion of the Sussexes’ interview resumed.

 

Lucy Campbell

Tue 9 Mar 2021 09.22 GMT

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2021/mar/09/piers-morgan-storms-off-set-of-good-morning-britain-in-meghan-row-alex-beresford

 

Piers Morgan stormed off the set of Good Morning Britain on Tuesday after his co-presenter, Alex Beresford, criticised the way he “continues to trash” the Duchess of Sussex.

 

His co-host, Susanna Reid, was forced to send the ITV show to an early break after the row boiled over and Morgan walked off live on air. Beresford called his behaviour “pathetic” and “diabolical”.

 

The pair had been discussing the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s tell-all interview with Oprah Winfrey, which aired in the UK on Monday night, that threatens to have devastating repercussions for the reputation of the UK monarchy.

 

Among the most damning disclosures in the interview was the claim that a member of the royal household had asked Prince Harry about about how dark the skin tone of their baby son, Archie, would be.

 

Buckingham Palace is under mounting pressure to respond to the racism allegations in the interview, which Harry has made clear are not related to his grandparents, the Queen and Prince Philip.

 

In the exchange on Tuesday morning, the GMB weather presenter Beresford noted the “overwhelming” amount of negative press Harry and Meghan have been subject to since they got engaged and the impact it has had on the couple’s mental health.

 

Speaking to Oprah, Meghan detailed how her mental health had deteriorated while she was pregnant amid the barrage of negative press and lack of support from the firm, which had repeatedly turned down her appeals for help and discouraged her from leaving the house for months.

 

She disclosed that she had suicidal thoughts during that time and was afraid to be left alone. “It was all happening just because I was breathing,” Meghan said. “I just didn’t want to be alive any more. That was a clear, real, frightening and constant thought.”

 

In reference to Morgan’s previous claim that he used to speak to Meghan and she “dropped him” once she started dating Harry, Beresford told him: “She’s entitled to cut you off if she wants to … yet you continue to trash her”.

 

Beresford said: “I understand that you don’t like Meghan Markle, you’ve made it so clear a number of times on this programme, and I understand you’ve got a personal relationship with Meghan Markle and she cut you off. Has she said anything about you since she cut you off? I don’t think she has but yet you continue to trash her...”

 

Morgan, 55, then stormed out of the studio, saying: “OK, I’m done with this, sorry, no, can’t do this.” Beresford called his behaviour “pathetic” and “diabolical”.

 

He added: “I’m sorry but Piers spouts off on a regular basis and we all have to sit there and listen, 6.30 to seven o’clock yesterday was incredibly hard to watch, incredibly hard to watch. This is, you know, he has the ability to come in here and talk from a position where he doesn’t fully understand.”

 

Morgan later returned to the set and the discussion of the Sussexes’ interview resumed.

 

The ITV chief executive, Carolyn McCall, said a senior executive at the broadcaster had talked to Morgan about his criticism of Meghan.

 

Morgan, a former CNN presenter, has previously criticised the couple and said they sought publicity on their own terms without the scrutiny that came with the job.

 

McCall told reporters that Kevin Lygo, ITV’s director of television, had spoken to Morgan in recent days about his comments. She added that she had not spoken to Morgan or seen Tuesday morning’s programme yet as she had been presenting ITV’s annual figures.

 

She said ITV had many voices, was committed to supporting mental health and that the company could not control what Morgan said on Twitter. “ITV has many voices and we try and represent many voices on ITV every day,” she said, insisting GMB was “a balanced show”. “It’s not about one opinion.”

 

Morgan’s comments that he did not believe Meghan’s disclosure that she had suicidal thoughts have drawn criticism from the mental health charity Mind, which said it was “concerned and disappointed” by them.

 

The charity said: “It’s vital that, when people reach out for support or share their experiences of ill mental health, they are treated with dignity, respect and empathy.”

 

McCall added: “I completely believe what she [Meghan] said. It’s important everyone does.”


Piers Morgan: Meghan Markle Has ‘Fired Off a Rocket’ at Royal Family


Piers Morgan storms off Good Morning Britain after Alex Beresford condemns him for ‘trashing’ Meghan Markle

 

Beresford described Morgan’s behaviour as ‘pathetic’ and ‘diabolical’

 

Louis Chilton

https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/news/piers-morgan-gmb-meghan-markle-alex-beresford-b1814352.html?utm_content=Echobox&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwAR1tqacTVSTsU1MeyPRc3OjMFhM4Wcdb37eASKTWwOAY4gp_2scwW2vhkR0#Echobox=1615275482

 

Piers Morgan walked off the set of Good Morning Britain midway through filming this morning (9 March) after co-star Alex Beresford described his behaviour as “diabolical”.

 

The presenter faced heavy criticism for his remarks about Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, following the couple’s interview with Oprah Winfrey which aired in the US on Sunday (7 March).

 

In the interview, Meghan revealed she previously had suicidal thoughts due to the abuse she had received when joining the royal family. On yesterday’s episode of Good Morning Britain, Morgan said: “I’m sorry, I don’t believe a word she said, Meghan Markle. I wouldn’t believe it if she read me a weather report.”

 

His remarks were widely criticised by his co-presenters and on social media, with broadcaster ITV also being called “hypocritical” for allowing him to “cast aspersions” while also running the mental health campaign Get Britain Talking.

 

On this morning’s (9 March) episode of Good Morning Britain, Beresford addressed Morgan’s recent comments, saying: “This is absolutely diabolical behaviour.”

 

“[Harry and Meghan] have had an overwhelming amount of negative press,” he said. “I watched the programme yesterday and yes, they had some great press around the wedding... but everything that has followed since has been incredibly damaging to Meghan’s mental health and to Harry.”

 

“I understand that you don’t like Meghan Markle. You’ve made it so clear a number of times on this programme, and I understand that you had a personal relationship with Meghan Markle and she cut you off. Has she said anything about you after she cut you off? She’s entitled to cut you off if she wants to. And yet you continue to trash her.”

 

At this point, Morgan stood up and walked away from the Good Morning Britain set, saying: “OK, I’m done with this.”

 

As Morgan was leaving, Beresford added: “Do you know what? That’s pathetic. This is absolutely diabolical behaviour. I’m sorry, but Piers spouts off on a regular basis and we all have to sit there and listen – 6.30 to 7 o’clock yesterday was incredibly hard to watch.”