Sunday, 14 December 2014

Remembering The "Ursula" Suit.



Early in the war Philips and his crew had become dissatisfied with the conventional garb of oilskins and designed a special form of clothing more suitable for submarines. Ursula's navigating officer, Lt Lakin, was a keen motorcyclist and wore a one-piece motorcycling suit made by Barbour. Philips asked the company to adapt the suit, splitting it into jacket and trousers and adding a hood. The suit became standard watch-keeping clothing in Royal Navy submarines.

Picture  showing the lookout left of camera in his Royal Navy issue Ursula Suit.

Thursday, 11 December 2014

Mr. Turner, by Mike Leigh.


Mr. Turner is a 2014 British biographical drama film, written and directed by Mike Leigh, and starring Timothy Spall, Dorothy Atkinson, Paul Jesson, Marion Bailey, Lesley Manville, and Martin Savage. The film concerns the life and career of British artist J. M. W. Turner (played by Spall). It premiered in competition for the Palme d'Or at the 2014 Cannes Film Festival, where Spall won the award for Best Actor and cinematographer Dick Pope received a special jury prize for the film's cinematography.
Leigh has described Turner as "a great artist: a radical, revolutionary painter," explaining, "I felt there was scope for a film examining the tension between this very mortal, flawed individual, and the epic work, the spiritual way he had of distilling the world."

A look at the last quarter century of the great British painter J. M. W. Turner. Profoundly affected by the death of his esteemed father, loved by his housekeeper, Hannah Danby, whom he takes for granted and occasionally exploits sexually, he forms a close relationship with a seaside landlady with whom he eventually lives incognito in Chelsea, where he dies.

Throughout all this, Turner travels, paints, stays with the country aristocracy, visits brothels, is a popular if anarchic member of the Royal Academy of Arts, has himself strapped to the mast of a ship so that he can paint a snowstorm, and is both celebrated and reviled by the public and by royalty.

Mr. Turner had its premiere at the 2014 Cannes Film Festival, where it competed for the Palme d'Or, with Timothy Spall winning the Best Actor award and cinematographer Dick Pope winning the Vulcan Award. Entertainment One are scheduled to release the film in the United Kingdom on 31 October 2014. Sony Pictures Classics will handle the United States distribution, with a scheduled release date of 19 December 2014. It is scheduled to be screened in the Special Presentations section of the 2014 Toronto International Film Festival.

Directed by     Mike Leigh
Produced by   Georgina Lowe
Written by      Mike Leigh
Starring           Timothy Spall
Dorothy Atkinson
Marion Bailey
Paul Jesson
Lesley Manville
Martin Savage
Music by         Gary Yershon
Cinematography         Dick Pope
Edited by        Jon Gregory
Production
company        
Film4
Focus Features International
Lipsync Productions
Thin Man Films
Xofa Productions
Distributed by            Entertainment One
Release dates 
15 May 2014 (Cannes)
31 October 2014 (United Kingdom)
19 December 2014 (United States)
Running time  150 minutes
Country          United Kingdom
Language        English



Impressions of Mr Turner: a film researcher’s view from books to screen
Premiere of director Mike Leigh’s film ends a collaborative creative process that started more than two years ago
Jacqueline Riding

On a sunny afternoon in December two years ago, the cast and crew of the film Mr Turner – then only known as Untitled 13 – gathered in central London for a read through. Only there was no read through, because there was no script.

Mike Leigh’s film-making process is intensive and collaborative, with character, action and dialogue gradually emerging from months of research, discussion and improvisation – and he told us that this method is broadly the same whatever the subject. It was a process that would develop over six months of rehearsals, and a four-month shoot.

At the initial stage there was a lot of reading (the books on JMW Turner alone can be measured by the yard), and site visits and dossiers to be created – of Turner’s family, partners, fellow artists, friends, patrons, associates – out of which the time span of the film is settled, themes and events are defined, characters are selected and actors cast. We managed to get agreement from a large number of museums and galleries to use their images and selected hundreds of works that could be included in the set-piece reconstructions, such as Turner’s Queen Anne Street gallery and the magnificent 1832 Royal Academy summer exhibition. The next research stage was a sort of actors’ art/history boot camp, which happened alongside the actors’ sessions with Mike, because everything and anything that was read or experienced might find its way into the character, the scene and the dialogue.

This meant a lot of work for each actor, particularly Timothy Spall, playing Turner. For a character such as Turner, one challenge is knowing when to stop. With others, such as his close companion Sophia Booth (played by Marion Bailey) and his housekeeper Hannah Danby (Dorothy Atkinson), surprisingly little had been written about them, considering the gamut of Turner biographies.

But to give an indication of the overall scale and scope of the research covered: in early December 2012 there were 40 actors, which gradually expanded to 76 as the rehearsal period went on, until the characters included a monarch, a barber, an earl, an art critic, a sherry merchant, an evangelical Anglican, a doctor, a slave ship carpenter, a photographer, an army officer, an architect, two prostitutes and 15 artists (including the great man himself).

The research took us from Kensington Palace to Berry Bros & Rudd fine wine merchants, from the Royal Hospital Museum in Chelsea to the Royal London Hospital at Whitechapel, and from Sir John Soane’s Museum to Margate and Twickenham (Turner’s House). Paul Jesson (playing William Turner senior) had lessons in traditional wet shaving, while Leo Bill (as the photographer John JE Mayall) had sessions on daguerreotype photography with expert David Burder.

I spent months in the British Library and the London Library – the latter packed full of wonderful material such as an 1813 housekeeping manual that provided a useful contemporary recipe for a pig’s head stuffing, using brains and bread crumbs, and early travel guides to Kent.

There were sessions for the “artists” in the library and archive of the Royal Academy, hands-on pigment and oil-paint classes at Winsor & Newton fine art materials and back at U13 central, group discussions on art theory, history and practice. At the Royal Museums and Old Royal Naval College at Greenwich, the same group covered everything from Lord Nelson, Trafalgar and the Temeraire to decorative history painting and European marine art – the latter courtesy of my sister, Christine Riding, who happened to be curating the major exhibition, Turner and the Sea, which Leigh opened in November 2013.

From early on, some form of reconstruction of Turner’s most famous painting, The Fighting Temeraire, was discussed. Clearly computer-generated imagery would be required, but the reality was very different to Turner’s vision. It is known that the Royal Navy had stripped the ship of anything useful, including her masts, and that she was taken up the Thames to Rotherhithe by two tugs and that her last journey to the breaker’s wharf began on the morning of 5 September 1838 to take advantage of the spring tides. No masts, no ethereal glow, no lone jaunty tug, no elegiac sunset.

But then Turner’s painting is essentially a construct of his own imagination using the bare facts of the event as a starting point. That the scene in the film shows a masted war ship and a sunset, with Turner and his companions Clarkson Stanfield (Mark Stanley) and David Roberts (Jamie Thomas King) taking a boat down the Thames to see her, is following Turner’s lead – an imagined scene full of poignant historical resonances, and a little knowing humour, based on the event and in this case the painting it stimulated. I believe the result is spectacular.

A highlight of one rehearsal involved seven actors, including Spall and Josh McGuire (Turner’s champion John Ruskin), which began with a discussion on gooseberries and then segued into the relative merits of Claude Lorrain (then, as now, a revered French 17th-century painter) and Turner’s own representations of the sea.

In the film, you are watching months, years actually, of preparation and graft, gradually evolved from improvisations, then honed into an elegant, funny and revealing five-minute scene. Ultimately, my role was to provide information, to advise, to avoid any howlers and then to stand back. For, as Mike says, this is a movie, not a documentary.

The author was the lead researcher on Mike Leigh’s Mr Turner




The real Mr Turner: has Mike Leigh’s film got its man?

Timothy Spall plays the painter as a rough diamond, a blast of the roistering 18th century in the moralising Victorian era

Timothy Spall’s Turner is a strange, magnificent being. He gurns, he growls, he mumbles and grumbles. It is impossible not to be fascinated and moved by him. His onscreen death made me cry. But how much does this great plum pie of a man churning his way through a 19th-century England resemble the actual JMW Turner, who was born in 1775 and died in 1851?

The real Turner was a lot more handsome and elegant, at least in his own eyes. Spall’s Turner admits that “when I look in the mirror, I see a gargoyle”. Real Turner, when he was about 24 years old – much younger than when we meet him in the film – gazed in the mirror and saw a handsome, debonair, fiercely perceptive youth, his wide open eyes looking straight ahead, seeing everything.

It is those eyes that contain the true Turner. It is in their fiery vision of nature, myth and history that all his secrets can be found.

Turner lives in his paintings. You only have to stroll through Tate Britain’s Clore Gallery, which displays works from the copious bequest of his own work that Turner left the nation, or visit the same museum’s Late Turner exhibition, to realise that most of the painter’s time, energy and emotion must have gone into producing sketches, watercolours and oil paintings. The sex life and affairs whose enigmas drive the film did not matter to him except as light relief from all that exhausting work.

In short, the real Turner was not as cuddly as Leigh makes him. He was a driven artist. He wanted to compete not just with contemporaries such as John Constable – who in the film looks appropriately downtrodden by Turner’s remorseless artistic strength – but Poussin, Rembrandt and Leonardo da Vinci. He did it – he painted himself into the pantheon of the greatest artists of all time. There is no evidence that he cared who he hurt to get there.

Spall’s Turner is a rough diamond. Really rough. We see him spurn a former mistress and refuse to acknowledge paternity of their children; completely true. We also see him drawing a prostitute in a brothel – again, true to what is known about him. But the greatness of Spall’s acting lies in humanising a man who at times seems so brutal and cold. When he thinks about the daughter whose funeral he didn’t attend, he weeps. When he makes the prostitute pose, he also weeps. Is it guilt?

Leigh and Spall are just as blind as the moralising Victorians were to what is likely to have been Turner’s real attitude to love, sex and family responsibilities: he probably never felt a shred of anxiety about any of it. Where he came from, loving and leaving was natural. For he came from the 18th century.

Turner was the victim of a culture clash. He grew up and became an artist in the freewheeling Georgian age, when London was full of Hogarthian rakes and Moll Flanders types on the make. Even coffee houses frequently doubled as brothels. Don’t even ask about the bathhouses. As the Cambridge historian Vic Gatrell, whose recent book The First Bohemians delves into the artistic and sexual scene of 18th-century Covent Garden, told me: “I don’t think he’s self-conscious about his libertine ways.”

Eighteenth-century libertinism was simply the culture that shaped young Turner. He was born in Maiden Lane, close by Covent Garden, then the heart of London’s gambling, drinking and commercial sex district. His father was a barber, his mother was mentally ill, perhaps schizophrenic, and ended up in the notorious Bedlam hospital. It was, says Gatrell, a bohemian world.

This London of loose morals was remote from the same city in which he died in 1851. In the course of his lifetime, British manners were transformed. The freedoms of the Georgian age had become constrained by starched collars and cast-iron respectability. Turner’s great critical champion, John Ruskin, was one of the most Victorian of Victorians, and when he went through Turner’s artistic bequest at the National Gallery, he felt ill. He found not just the landscapes he loved, but sketches “of the most shameful sort – the pudenda of women – utterly inexcusable and to me inexplicable”. Ruskin revealed that he burned most of Turner’s erotic art, for the good of his hero’s reputation and the national soul. Strangely enough, he seems to have been lying. Tate Britain has now located enough of Turner’s sexy watercolours to establish that Ruskin never did burn them – or if he did destroy some, there must really have been a lot.

This was the second shock Ruskin and other Victorian Turner fans had suffered. The first was when he died in the secret Chelsea home he shared with his last lover, Mrs Booth, a Margate landlady. Leigh is on firmer ground in making this relationship touching and warm – they were both old enough and their life together lasted long enough for it to have been emotional, not just a libertine’s last fling.

In Turner’s painting Apollo and Python in Tate Britain, the ancient Greek god Apollo has just slain a horrific serpentine monster. Turner surrounds Apollo with golden light. He is the embodiment of reason and – literally – enlightenment. The monster Python lies tangled in the branches of devastated trees, its viscera spewing out. Its jaws are almost invisible in the darkness that envelops this part of the picture. Looking into that gloom, you start to notice something disturbing. There are other monsters in the dark. A glittering eye, a gruesome set of fangs glisten in the shadows. Python is dead, but unreason lives on. More monsters are creeping forward to threaten all that is good.

Is this painting autobiographical? It might be an exploration of the artist’s own dark side. He may be thinking of his mother’s madness. Was he scared of going mad himself? Yet any such personal feelings are translated by Turner to the lofty level of history painting. His art aspires all the time to say things not about him, but about the human condition. Apollo and Python is one of the greatest of all paintings of a Greek myth because it so deeply and resonantly reveals the poetry and philosophy of the ancient legend – that it is a story about reason, unreason and the nature of civilisation.

The inarticulacy of Spall’s Turner is true to life. He was mocked for it – and again it comes from his unvarnished London childhood. He came “out of the people, out of the plebs”, says Gatrell. But there’s always going to be something missing from our understanding of Turner if we only listen to his sometimes stumbling words. His paintings, truly, are where the real Mr Turner can be found. In them he does not stumble. He never has – Ruskin was right to insist – a mean or ignoble thought. Apollo and Python is unutterably profound. It is in his works of unparalleled insight and nuance that we encounter the real Mr Turner – the genius.

Wednesday, 10 December 2014

Tamara de Lempicka.



She was born Maria Górska in Warsaw, Congress Poland under the rulership of the Russian Empire, into a wealthy and prominent family. Lempicka was the daughter of Boris Gurwik-Górski, a Russian Jewish attorney for a French trading company, and Malwina Dekler, a Polish socialite who met him at one of the European spas. Maria had two siblings and was the middle child. She attended a boarding school in Lausanne, Switzerland, and spent the winter of 1911 with her grandmother in Italy and on the French Riviera, where she was treated to her first taste of the Great Masters of Italian painting. In 1912, her parents divorced, and Maria went to live with her rich Aunt Stefa in St. Petersburg, Russia. When her mother remarried, she became determined to break away to make a life of her own. In 1913, at the age of fifteen, while attending the opera, Maria spotted the man she became determined to marry. She promoted her campaign through her well-connected uncle, and in 1916 she married Tadeusz Łempicki (1888–1951) in St. Petersburg—a well-known ladies' man, gadabout, and lawyer by title, who was tempted by the significant dowry.

In 1917, during the Russian Revolution, Tadeusz Łempicki was arrested in the dead of night by the Bolsheviks. Maria searched the prisons for him and after several weeks, with the help of the Swedish consul, she secured his release. They traveled to Copenhagen then to London and finally to Paris, to where Maria's family had also escaped.
                                                                                                   
In Paris, the Lempickis lived for a while from the sale of family jewels. Tadeusz proved unwilling or unable to find suitable work, which added to the domestic strain, while Maria gave birth to Kizette Lempicka. Her sister, the designer Adrienne Gorska, made furniture for her Paris apartment and studio in the Art Deco style, complete with chrome-plated furniture.The flat at 7 Rue Mechain was built by the architect Robert Mallet-Stevens known for his clean lines.

Lempicka's distinctive and bold artistic style developed quickly, influenced by what André Lhote sometimes referred to as "soft cubism" and by the "synthetic cubism" of Maurice Denis, epitomizing the cool yet sensual side of the Art Deco movement. For her, Picasso "embodied the novelty of destruction". She thought that many of the Impressionists drew badly and employed "dirty" colors. Lempicka's technique would be novel, clean, precise, and elegant.

For her first major show, in Milan, Italy in 1925, under the sponsorship of Count Emmanuele Castelbarco, Lempicka painted 28 new works in six months. A portrait would take three weeks of work, allowing for the nuisance of dealing with a difficult sitter; by 1927, Lempicka could charge 50,000 French francs for a portrait, a sum equal to about US$2,000 then and more than ten times as much today. Through Castelbarco, she was introduced to Italy's great man of letters and notorious lover, Gabriele d'Annunzio. She visited the poet twice at his villa on Lake Garda, seeking to paint his portrait; he in turn was set on seduction. After her unsuccessful attempts to secure the commission, she went away angry, while d'Annunzio also remained unsatisfied.

In 1925, Lempicka painted her iconic work Auto-Portrait (Tamara in the Green Bugatti) for the cover of the German fashion magazine Die Dame. As summed up by the magazine Auto-Journal in 1974, "the self-portrait of Tamara de Lempicka is a real image of the independent woman who asserts herself. Her hands are gloved, she is helmeted, and inaccessible; a cold and disturbing beauty [through which] pierces a formidable being—this woman is free!" In 1927 Lempicka won her first major award, the first prize at the Exposition Internationale des Beaux Arts in Bordeaux, France, for her portrait of Kizette on the Balcony.

Lempicka's distinctive and bold artistic style developed quickly, influenced by what André Lhote sometimes referred to as "soft cubism" and by the "synthetic cubism" of Maurice Denis, epitomizing the cool yet sensual side of the Art Deco movement. For her, Picasso "embodied the novelty of destruction". She thought that many of the Impressionists drew badly and employed "dirty" colors. Lempicka's technique would be novel, clean, precise, and elegant.

For her first major show, in Milan, Italy in 1925, under the sponsorship of Count Emmanuele Castelbarco, Lempicka painted 28 new works in six months. A portrait would take three weeks of work, allowing for the nuisance of dealing with a difficult sitter; by 1927, Lempicka could charge 50,000 French francs for a portrait, a sum equal to about US$2,000 then and more than ten times as much today. Through Castelbarco, she was introduced to Italy's great man of letters and notorious lover, Gabriele d'Annunzio. She visited the poet twice at his villa on Lake Garda, seeking to paint his portrait; he in turn was set on seduction. After her unsuccessful attempts to secure the commission, she went away angry, while d'Annunzio also remained unsatisfied.

In 1925, Lempicka painted her iconic work Auto-Portrait (Tamara in the Green Bugatti) for the cover of the German fashion magazine Die Dame. As summed up by the magazine Auto-Journal in 1974, "the self-portrait of Tamara de Lempicka is a real image of the independent woman who asserts herself. Her hands are gloved, she is helmeted, and inaccessible; a cold and disturbing beauty through which pierces a formidable being—this woman is free!"In 1927 Lempicka won her first major award, the first prize at the Exposition Internationale des Beaux Arts in Bordeaux, France, for her portrait of Kizette on the Balcony.

In Paris during the Roaring Twenties, Tamara de Lempicka became part of the bohemian life: she knew Pablo Picasso, Jean Cocteau, and André Gide. Famous for her libido, she was bisexual. Her affairs with both men and women were conducted in ways that were considered scandalous at the time. She often used formal and narrative elements in her portraits, and her nude studies produced overpowering effects of desire and seduction. In the 1920s she became closely associated with lesbian and bisexual women in writing and artistic circles, such as Violet Trefusis, Vita Sackville-West, and Colette. She also became involved with Suzy Solidor, a night club singer at the Boîte de Nuit, whose portrait she later painted.
Her husband eventually tired of their arrangement and abandoned her in 1927. They were divorced in 1931 in Paris.

Obsessed with her work and her social life, Lempicka neglected more than her husband; she rarely saw her daughter. When Kizette was not away at boarding school (France or England), the girl was often with her grandmother Malvina. When Lempicka informed her mother and daughter that she would not be returning from America for Christmas in 1929, Malvina was so angry that she burned Lempicka's enormous collection of designer hats; Kizette watched them burn, one by one

Kizette was neglected, but also immortalized. Lempicka painted her only child repeatedly, leaving a striking portrait series: Kizette in Pink, 1926; Kizette on the Balcony, 1927; Kizette Sleeping, 1934; Portrait of Baroness Kizette, 1954–5, etc. In other paintings, the women depicted tend to resemble Kizette.

In 1928, her longtime patron the Baron Raoul Kuffner von Diószeg (1886–1961) visited her studio and commissioned her to paint his mistress. Lempicka finished the portrait, then took the mistress' place in the Baron's life. She travelled to the United States for the first time in 1929, to paint a commissioned portrait for Rufus Bush and to arrange a show of her work at the Carnegie Institute in Pittsburgh. The show went well but the money she earned was lost when the bank she used collapsed following the Stock Market Crash of 1929.

Lempicka continued both her heavy workload and her frenetic social life through the next decade. The Great Depression had little effect on her; in the early 1930s she was painting King Alfonso XIII of Spain and Queen Elizabeth of Greece. Museums began to collect her works. In 1933 she traveled to Chicago where she worked with Georgia O'Keeffe, Santiago Martínez Delgado and Willem de Kooning. Her social position was cemented when she married her lover, Baron Kuffner, on 3 February 1934 in Zurich (his wife had died the year before). The Baron took her out of her quasi-bohemian life and finally secured her place in high society again, with a title to boot. She repaid him by convincing him to sell many of his estates in Eastern Europe and move his money to Switzerland. She saw the coming of World War II from a long way off, much sooner than most of her contemporaries. She did make a few concessions to the changing times as the decade passed; her art featured a few refugees and common people, and even a Christian saint or two, as well as the usual aristocrats and cold nudes.

After Baron Kuffner's death from a heart attack on 3 November 1961 on the ocean liner Liberté en route to New York, she sold most of her possessions and made three around-the-world trips by ship. Finally Lempicka moved to Houston, Texas to be with Kizette and her family. (Kizette had married a man named Harold Foxhall, who was then chief geologist for the Dow Chemical Company; they had two daughters.) There she began her difficult and disagreeable later years. Kizette served as Tamara's business manager, social secretary, and factotum, and suffered under her mother's controlling domination and petulant behavior. Tamara complained that not only were the paints and other artists' materials now inferior to the "old days" but that people in the 1970s lacked the special qualities and "breeding" that inspired her art. The artistry and craftsmanship of her glory days were unrecoverable. In 1978 Tamara moved to Cuernavaca, Mexico, to live among an aging international set and some of the younger aristocrats. After Kizette's husband died of cancer, she attended her mother for three months until Tamara died in her sleep on March 18, 1980. She was cremated and her ashes were scattered over the volcano of Popocatepetl on 27 March 1980 by her Mexican friend Victor Manuel Contreras and her daughter Kizette.

In the winter of 1939, Lempicka and her husband started an "extended vacation" in the United States. She immediately arranged for a show of her work in New York, though the Baron and Baroness chose to settle in Beverly Hills, California, living in the former residence of Hollywood director King Vidor. She cultivated a Garboesque manner. The Baroness would visit the Hollywood stars on their studio sets, such as Tyrone Power, Walter Pidgeon, and George Sanders and they would come to her studio to see her at work. She did war relief work, like many others at the time; and she managed to get Kizette out of Nazi-occupied Paris, via Lisbon, in 1941. Some of her paintings of this time had a Salvador Dalí quality, as displayed in Key and Hand, 1941. In 1943, the couple relocated to New York City. Even though she continued to live in style, socializing continuously, her popularity as a society painter had diminished greatly. They traveled to Europe frequently to visit fashionable spas and so that the Baron could attend to Hungarian refugee work. For a while, she continued to paint in her trademark style, although her range of subject matter expanded to include still lifes, and even some abstracts. Yet eventually she adopted a new style, using palette knife instead of brushes. Her new work was not well received when she exhibited in 1962 at the Iolas Gallery. Lempicka determined never to show her work again, and retired from active life as a professional artist.

Insofar as she still painted at all, Lempicka sometimes reworked earlier pieces in her new style. The crisp and direct Amethyste (1946), for example, became the pink and fuzzy Girl with Guitar (1963). She showcased at the Ror Volmar Gallery in Paris from 30 May to 17 June 1961.


Lempicka lived long enough for the wheel of fashion to turn a full circle: before she died a new generation had discovered her art and greeted it with enthusiasm. A retrospective in 1973 drew positive reviews. At the time of her death, her early Art Deco paintings were being shown and purchased once again. A stage play, Tamara, was inspired by her meeting with Gabriele D'Annunzio and was first staged in Toronto; it then ran in Los Angeles for eleven years (1984–1995) at the VFW Post, making it the longest running play in Los Angeles, and some 240 actors were employed over the years. The play was also subsequently produced at the Seventh Regiment Armory in New York City. In 2005, the actress and artist Kara Wilson performed Deco Diva, a one-woman stage play based on Lempicka's life. Her life and her relationship with one of her models is fictionalized in Ellis Avery's novel The Last Nude,  which won the American Library Association Stonewall Book Awards Barbara Gittings Literature Award for 2013.


The good old naughty days
In life Tamara de Lempicka was a Left Bank bisexual with an appetite for bohemian living. Her work, though, portrays the dubious glamour and discipline of fascism
Fiona MacCarthy

If there is a single image that encapsulates art deco, it is Tamara de Lempicka's self-portrait Tamara in the Green Bugatti. It was commissioned for the cover of the German magazine Die Dame, which defined her as "a symbol of women's liberation". The tight, post-cubist composition of the painting; the muted, sophisticated colour; the sense of speed and glamour; her blonde curl edging out of the head-hugging Hermès helmet; her long leather driving gauntlets; her lubricious red lips. Clearly this is a woman who means business - even to the extent of mowing down a few pedestrians.

Her time was the 1920s: a period of transition, an era in which functionalism merged with fantasy and formal social structures lurched into the frenetic. In essence, De Lempicka was a classicist, having admired Renaissance painting since her adolescent travels in Italy. But she astutely combined traditional portraiture with advertising techniques, photographic lighting, vistas of the tower architecture of great cities.

Her milieu was the glittery and scintillating Paris of the years between the wars, a place of high style and lascivious behaviour. With a callous authenticity, De Lempicka depicted the shifting morals of a Paris where nothing was precisely what it seemed. She lived and worked on the bisexual fringes of a society where there were no rules beyond the demands of style and entertainment. She was the great go-getter, a believer in exploiting one's resources to the ultimate. Her iconic green Bugatti wasn't green in reality but yellow. Nor was it even a Bugatti but a Renault. "There are no miracles," she stated with her icy realism. "There is only what you make."

Who was she? De Lempicka shuffled the facts of her biography much as she meddled with her birth date. Tamara Gurnick-Gorzka was born in Moscow - or could it have been Warsaw? - in 1898 or so, to a wealthy Polish mother and a cosmopolitan Russian father. Her background of social confidence and ease was to prove an advantage to a portraitist: she confronted her sitters on equal terms. In St Petersberg, she met Tadeusz Lempicki, a tall, saturnine attorney of noble family and, at the age of 14, announced her love for him. They were married just before the Russian revolution. Lempicki was arrested by the Bolsheviks but his wife secured his release.

Like other exiled White Russians, they arrived in Paris with no money, having abandoned their possessions. They now had a child, Kizette. Tadeusz Lempicki remained unemployed and moody. Tamara's portrait of her husband shows the queasy self-importance of the glamour boy displaced. These were years of deprivation, in which Tamara herself became determined to succeed as a professional artist. "My goal," she later wrote, "was never to copy, to create a new style, bright, luminous colours and to scent out elegance in my models." She became a prime interpreter of modernity.

De Lempicka's painting is a thing of gloss and gesture. In her early days in Paris, she enrolled at the Académie de la Grande Chaumière and absorbed the work of the old masters, especially admiring Bronzino. In some ways, De Lempicka is a mannerist reborn. She went on to study in the studio of the symbolist Maurice Denis, a highly decorative painter who instilled the sense of discipline and structure in her work.

Her most influential mentor was the painter and critic André Lhote, perpetrator of a less strident, gentler-coloured form of cubism, a style easily acceptable to the bourgeoisie. In her early Paris paintings, De Lempicka employed this "synthetic cubist" method, an accumulation of small geometric planes used to startlingly voluptuous effect in images of women reclining, women bathing, women embracing, laconically stroking one another's thighs. The blatant display of the naked female body was a feature of art deco - this was, after all, the era of Josephine Baker shaking her banana skins. De Lempicka's pair of pointing-breasted giantesses, The Friends, disport themselves in front of a futuristic stage set of skyscrapers, a 1920s fantasy of big city sex.

But her images of female nudity also recalled the French neo-classical tradition. Her group painting Women Bathing is the Left Bank lesbian version of Ingres's luscious harem composition The Turkish Bath. The critics' divination of "perverse Ingrism" in De Lempicka's paintings did her burgeoning popularity no harm. In real life, she acted up to it, displaying her own tall, slender, curvy body outstretched on a divan, wearing a titillating white satin robe with marabou feather adornments. Tamara played her own art deco goddess of desire.

She was a workaholic, permitting interruptions in her nine-hour painting sessions only for such necessities as champagne, a massage and a bath. She sold herself shrewdly and by 1923 was beginning to exhibit in small galleries in Paris. The next year, her work was shown at the Salon des Femmes Artistes Modernes in Paris, and in 1925 she had her first solo exhibition in Milan.

Her social life advanced in parallel, displaying the full force of Tamara's "killer instinct" (her daughter's description). There was something predatory in the way she acquired so many lovers of both sexes, many of whom were also her models and her patrons. The model for her painting Beautiful Rafaela was picked up in the street and seduced with aplomb. The portrait throbs with an intense erotic energy. The liaison continued for a year.

Tamara gave up on Tadeusz and, brandishing diamond bracelets from wrist to shoulder, joined the European avant-garde celebrities: Marinetti, Jean Cocteau, Gabriel d'Annunzio. She visited d'Annunzio at his notorious villa Il Vittoriale in Gardone where, unusually, she resisted his advances and, equally unusually, failed to paint his portrait - a singular loss to the De Lempicka oeuvre. She was a spectacular attender of Natalie Barney's afternoons "for women only" and claimed to have snorted cocaine with André Gide.

Thanks to her contacts in the world of the Paris couturiers, De Lempicka always looked fabulous. Photographed in the right light, she could be Greta Garbo's sister. She made her entrance at smart parties in magnificent garments donated by Coco Chanel and Elsa Schiaparelli.

In the late 1920s, De Lempicka acquired her most important patrons, Doctor Pierre Boucard and his wife. Boucard was a medical scientist, inventor of Lacteol, a cure for indigestion. He had become an avid modernist and already owned several De Lempicka nudes, including her most flamboyant lesbian painting, Myrto, Two Women on a Couch. He now offered her a two-year contract to paint portraits of himself, his wife and daughter, also asking for an option on any other paintings she produced.

This sudden financial stability allowed her to buy a three-storey house and studio on Rue Mechain on the Left Bank. She commissioned its refurbishment by Robert Mallet-Stevens, the most brilliant French modernist designer of the time. With its svelte grey interior, chrome fittings and American cocktail bar it gave De Lempicka the setting of ultimate urban smartness to which she had long aspired.

A contemporary architectural photograph shows the new studio in all its pristine glory. There in the centre on its easel is the portrait of Madame Boucard, completed in 1931, a sophisticated and accomplished painting that tells us as much about De Lempicka as it does about the sitter. De Lempicka is the connoisseur of textiles, jewels, hairstyles, the cut of the garment, the swathe of the mink stole: no other painter of the period gives us so precise a reading of its material values. Madame Boucard is posed like a Renaissance courtesan, her right nipple erect beneath the oyster satin bodice. She's a figure of power, with something of the brutal allure of Wallis Simpson. What she tells us is that every sex act has its price.

Size mattered in the Europe of that time. De Lempicka's male portraits show gigantic caddishness. Spiv-shouldered Doctor Boucard, with his test tube and his microscope, looks more the slick sharp man about town than man of healing. Count Fürstenberg Herdringen is a glass-eyed monster in a Frenchman's navy beret. Most frightening of all is the colossal portrait of the Grand Duke Gabriel Constantinovich, with his gold-braided uniform and empty, sneering face.

De Lempicka was an artist of the Fascist superworld: her portraits were allied to the "call to order" movement, the return to monumental realism in European art. Her art exudes the dark and dubious glamour of authoritarian discipline. When she paints the Duchesse de la Salle, the Duchess is in jackboots, one hand thrust in her pocket in an attitude of menace. It is a tremendous portrait, painted with the sheer theatrical enjoyment, the unerring sense of decor, of De Lempicka's best work.

In 1933 she remarried. Baron Raoul Kuffner was the owner of vast estates donated to his family of stockbreeders and brewers by Emperor Franz-Josef for supplying the Hapsburg court. De Lempicka had already portrayed her future husband as a dandy desperado, gazing out inscrutably from behind hooded lids. She had also painted - and in doing so disposed of - his previous mistress, the Andalusian dancer Nana de Herrera, selecting her as model for the most overtly decadent of the "damned women" in the notorious Group of Four Nudes .

De Lempicka was never a consistent painter. As with many ruthless people, her swagger could give way to a strain of awful mawkishness: cubism and kitsch. Once she became Baroness Kuffner, Tamara lost direction. The urge for fame, and indeed subsistence, left her. The age of art deco, in which she thrived, was over. Her sentimental studies of old men with guitars and lachrymose mother superiors are a dreadful anti-climax after the bitchy candour of her portrait of lesbian nightclub owner Suzy Solidor.

The political terrors of Europe in the 1930s were impinging: she and the baron, on holiday in Austria, were appalled to have their breakfast on the hotel verandah interrupted by a singing parade of Hitler Youth. In 1939, urged by Tamara, who was partly Jewish, Kuffner sold his estates in Hungary and they moved to the US. In New York, she tried abstract expressionism unsuccessfully, and was reduced to the role of a chic curiosity, "the painting baroness".

De Lempicka died in 1980 in Mexico, having directed that her ashes be scattered over the crater of volcanic Mount Popocatepetl. The woman who in her lifetime was described as "a little hot potato" came to a suitably inflammatory end. Her expensively dressed rogues gallery of portraits, though hardly great art, add up to a unique and alarming social document, recording the seductive surface textures of a European society en route to self-destruct.


October 24, 1999
Glitter Art
The life of a Deco painter who was as sybaritic as her subjects.

Jean Cocteau once said of the painter Tamara de Lempicka that she loved ''art and high society in equal measure.'' If her pursuit of society resulted in opened doors and enviable pleasures, two-timing the art world would also prove to be the bane of her existence. ''To artists she appeared to be an upper-class dilettante, and to the nervous haute bourgeoisie she seemed arrogant and depraved,'' Laura Claridge writes in ''Tamara de Lempicka: A Life of Deco and Decadence.''

A Polish-Russian aristocrat, Lempicka barely escaped the Bolshevik Revolution. In 1918, she landed in a drab little hotel room in Paris with her unemployed husband and a small child. Within a few years, marshaling her innate talent, her wit and Greta Garbo looks, she became the most talked about Art Deco painter of her time. To this day, her erotic portraits of stylish sybarites are enduring testaments to the novelty-loving materialism and decadence of the glittering 1920's.

There was nothing ordinary about Lempicka; even her name clings to the tongue like an exotic marmalade. Flamboyant (paradoxically remaining true to herself while being a slave to fashion) and imperious, she pinned down her husbands like butterflies in a case, gave lavish parties for hundreds and indulged in every vice that came her way. In the Paris salon of the poet Natalie Barney, she sniffed cocaine and drank sloe gin fizzes laced with hashish among the likes of Andre Gide. On the banks of the Seine, she picked up sailors and female prostitutes. After her nocturnal debauches, she painted until dawn. Her life style (and her ''affair'' with the Italian poet Gabriele D'Annunzio) sent her first husband, Tadeusz Lempicki, packing into the arms of a plump heiress.

Lempicka's second marriage was to the Hungarian Jewish Baron Raoul Kuffner, which necessitated a second flight, this time from Hitler's Europe to the United States. In New York and Hollywood (where she was known as ''the Baroness with a paintbrush'') she saw her career rise and plummet -- only to have her work rediscovered in the 1970's and 80's (she died in Cuernavaca, Mexico, in 1980) and collected by celebrities like Madonna and Jack Nicholson.

It is Claridge's ambition that Lempicka, whom she calls ''one of the 20th century's most important and iconoclastic artists,'' be returned to her rightful place in the limelight. But her rush to enshrine Lempicka in the pantheon of modern art's greatest masters sometimes results in breathy pronouncements and lapses of judgment that disrupt an otherwise lucid and interesting account of Lempicka's life and art.
In uncovering Lempicka's life, Claridge, the author of ''Romantic Potency: The Paradox of Desire,'' has surmounted a serious handicap. There were no diaries and few letters and documents to consult; most previous accounts of Lempicka's life have been based on her deliberate lies and improvised anecdotes. Claridge establishes that Tamara Gurwik-Gorska was born around 1895 in Moscow -- not, as she insisted, in 1898 (or later) in Warsaw. Her mother, Malvina Dekler, came from wealthy Polish bankers; her father, Boris Gurwik-Gorski, was a successful Russian Jewish merchant. He disappeared early in Lempicka's childhood, and she fairly well erased him and her Jewish heritage from her memory. She grew up in the hierarchical, class-conscious atmosphere of the haute bourgeoisie during la belle époque. She attended finishing school, visited Warsaw, St. Petersburg, Paris, and made annual tours of Italy, where she first fell in love with the Renaissance masters that were to become an important influence on her work.

By 1910, Lempicka was spending most of her time at her wealthy aunt's opulent residence in St. Petersburg. It was there that she acquired her taste for luxury, and, at a costume ball, she set her sights on her future husband, a handsome Polish lawyer named Tadeusz Junosza-Lempicki. The couple's idyllic, spoiled existence -- traipsing from avant-garde cafe gatherings to society teas -- was cut short by the Russian Revolution. The Cheka arrested Tadeusz, and Lempicka was left to her own devices to free her husband and escape to Paris. ''Paradoxically,'' Claridge writes, Lempicka the painter ''would not have existed without the Russian Revolution. Her expulsion from a predestined life of privilege transformed her into a modern woman.''

In Paris, Lempicka, who had early on shown talent as an artist, took up painting to support her family. To a sleek Cubist style she added the disciplined finish and melancholy light of Renaissance painting. She painted beautiful if somewhat dim-looking women -- half mannequins, half animals, with blood red lips and translucent eyes staring Belliniesquely at heaven, awaiting, it seems, not a message from God but an elixir to slake their restless ennui.

By the mid-20's, Lempicka's portraits of aristocrats and prostitutes were being exhibited in the Paris salons. Her ''Autoportrait: Or, Woman in the Green Bugatti'' (1929) was so often reproduced it became a sort of advertisement for the new modern woman -- independent, stylish and sexually liberated. Lempicka's success allowed her to mingle with avant-gardists like Jean Cocteau, Salvador Dali and Filippo Marinetti, but she remained disengaged from the progressive, leftist artistic climate of her time. Aloof and wild, she was fundamentally anti-intellectual. At home, too, she remained at sea. An absent wife, she used her artistic life to excuse her infidelities. A rigid perfectionist, she abused her daughter, Kizette. After her first marriage fell apart she suffered from severe bouts of depression that were to plague her for the rest of her life.

By the mid-1930's the neo-classical and decadent elements of Lempicka's painting made her suspect to both the left-wing critics and the fascists. Lempicka's place in the art world would not be resolved by her move to the United States in 1939. With her wealthy second husband's money she continued her frenetic socializing, while her representational painting quickly became an anachronism, overshadowed by Surrealism and Abstract Expressionism. In the 1960's she largely gave up her career and came to resemble a demanding, eccentric socialite more than an influential painter.

Claridge argues that Lempicka has been denied her rightful place in modern art history because she was a woman whose background was politically incorrect, and suggests a re-examination of Modernism is in order. She may not be up to that task, but she has contributed a well-deserved and sympathetic account of Lempicka's life.

Glyn Vincent is writing a biography of the artist Ralph Albert Blakelock.



By John Gross

PASSION BY DESIGN: The Art and Times of Tamara de Lempicka. By Baroness Kizette de Lempicka-Foxhall as told to Charles Phillips. Illustrated. 191 pages. Abbeville Press.

TAMARA DE LEMPICKA -you may not recognize her name, but there is a fair chance that you have seen her face. It gazes out from one of her most frequently reproduced paintings, the ''Auto-Portrait'' of 1925, also known as ''Tamara in the Green Bugatti.'' The young blond driver sits at the wheel of her car, with full red lips and sensuous eyes, gloved and helmeted like an aviator (though the helmet looks curiously metallic) -the perfect image of modernity, 1925 vintage, and the embodied spirit of Art Deco.

During the 1920's and 30's, while she was living in Paris, Tamara de Lempicka established herself as the quintessential Art Deco painter. No one who has seen them could readily forget the stylized portraits and nudes that she painted at that time, with their dramatic shadows and frozen drapery, their sub-Cubist backgrounds of planes and angles and skyscrapers. They have a hard, chrome and enamel feel to them, and yet they contrive to be full of individual character, too.

By the time she left for America, shortly before World War II, Lempicka's reputation was in decline. The dealers lost interest in her, and for many years her work, when it attracted attention at all, looked hopelessly dated.
Then, in the late 1960's, she began to share in the revived fortunes of Art Deco in general, and by the end of the 70's she had once more come into her own. A retrospective exhibition was held in Paris in 1972; a deluxe book about her, edited by Franco Maria Ricci, was published in 1977; since then the prices paid for her paintings have risen sharply, and there has even been a play about her (''Tamara,'' which was first produced in Hollywood in 1984 and will be coming to New York in the fall).

In spite of this she has remained an elusive, somewhat mysterious figure, and there was certainly room for a more extended study of her life than the two or three sketches that are all that has been available up until now. ''Passion by Design'' sets out to fill the gap; it also offers a handsome selection of the paintings (most of them reproduced in color) and photographs taken from Lempicka's own albums.

The text has an unusual history. After Lempicka died in 1980 her daughter, the Baroness Kizette de Lempicka-Foxhall, began to collect her letters and papers and start making notes of her own. Her relationship with her mother had been a difficult one; she was anxious to set down the story in a way that would, in the words of Charles Phillips, ''banish the ghost,'' and at the same time do Lempicka justice - to produce a book without any trace of ''Mommie Dearest,'' as it were.

In 1986 she met Mr. Phillips, and they agreed to collaborate. Mr. Phillips, as he explains, took down the Baroness's story, edited it and recast it in the third person; he has also supplemented it with his own research and material drawn from interviews with Lempicka's friends and acquaintances.

There is no reason in principle why such a method shouldn't have worked, but in practice the results are not very satisfactory. For much of its length, the book provides no more than a trickle of information, bulked out with feeble anecdotes and historical ''background'' of the most banal variety. The Jazz Age is summed up as ''the decade between the last machine gun burst in the trenches on the Marne and the first splat of bone and blood on the sidewalks of Wall Street''; the 1930's are ushered in with the news that ''before long a strange little man who looked remarkably like Charlie Chaplin would play on the turmoil of worldwide depression to get himself elected ruler of Germany.''

Still, let us be thankful for those hard facts about Lempicka that we are given - about her years in Paris in particular. She arrived there with her husband in 1918, both of them refugees from the Russian Revolution (Tamara herself was Polish); her life in exile felt empty, and she turned to painting at the suggestion of her sister, enrolling as a student with the painters Maurice Denis and Andre Lhote.

Her subsequent success brought her into contact with many leading artists and writers of the time (she painted a striking portrait of Andre Gide, for example), but she also kept one foot firmly in the world of smart society. The list of the friends she painted reads like a random dip into the Almanach de Gotha - the Marquis d'Afflitto, the Duchesse de la Salle, Count Furstenburg-Hendringen, the Grand Duke Gabriel Constantinovich - though a glance at their portraits will confirm that she was no mere flatterer.

One of the most oddly contorted and powerful of her portraits was of a Spanish dancer, Nana de Herrera. It was commissioned by Nana de Herrera's lover, a wealthy Hungarian called Baron Kuffner, and the authors describe it as ''something of an assassination''; shortly after it was finished Lempicka replaced the dancer as Kuffner's mistress. He was only one of her many conquests, but the most enduring of them: it was as Baroness Kuffner (they had been married in 1933) that she sailed with him to America in 1939.

The American years were spent in Hollywood, in New York and then, after Kuffner's death in 1962, in Houston. Apart from Hollywood, where Lempicka made a certain splash, they sound like a prolonged anticlimax, and by the time she moved to Mexico, in 1978, she had plainly become an impossible mother, and a fairly impossible person. But she did achieve one last grand gesture, asking for her ashes to be scattered from the air over the volcano Popocatepetl. Her request was honored.

A book with its share of colorful moments, then; but on the whole it is the pictures that are its justification. And not all of them, either - a few are pure kitsch; but the best of them have an electrifying impact.





Monday, 8 December 2014

Black Sheep .... by CHRISTOPHER OTHEN.





Murdered Earls, bisexual public school men, and war heroes with dark secrets. The political power of Britain’s upper classes may have declined in recent years but their instinct to lie, cheat, murder and steal is as strong as ever. CHRISTOPHER OTHEN, author of 'FRANCO'S INTERNATIONAL BRIGADES: ADVENTURERS, FASCISTS, AND CHRISTIAN CRUSADERS IN THE SPANISH CIVIL WAR' (amazon.co.uk or amazon.com), is your guide through a library of wrong doing. Please check your morals at the door.


Black Sheep

One Hundred Years of Bankrupt British Aristocrats, Corrupt Golden Youths, and Frankly Untrustworthy Remittance Men

In a hurry? Read the summary here.

Sitting comfortably? Then put a new cigarette in its ivory holder and refresh your whisky and soda. Get the servants to stoke the fire because these old houses can get so cold at night. And make sure your service revolver in the desk drawer is loaded. Captain Grimes is coming round tonight to discuss the accounts. The little matter of those post-dated cheques in the mess tin. You might be forced to take the gentleman’s way out. Or you might be forced to shoot Captain Grimes.

The wealthiest stratum of our society has always prided itself on loyalty, tradition, and devotion to duty. But too many of the aristocrats, trust fund beneficiaries and members of the officer class who sit at the apex of Britain’s social triangle have a moral backbone like a bit of wet spaghetti. From Rupert Bellville to Simon Raven, the Earl of Erroll to John Aspinall, the most respectable part of the country has churned out black sheep on a production line scale.

So put away that portfolio of artistic French photographs and leave answering the love note from your brother’s wife until later. Let’s take a stroll through the last one hundred years of bankrupt aristocrats, corrupt golden youths, and frankly untrustworthy remittance men. Books and the odd flick will be our signposts. I’ll be your guide. We’ll start gently, with some flawed heroes. Let’s go back to the days when we still had an Empire … .


Edwardian & First World War
Rupert Brooke was the archetypal golden youth. The kind liked by young girls and bachelor schoolmasters. Handsome, boyish, and a poet, he was the son of Rugby's headmaster and born into privilege. Michael Hasting's 1967 'Rupert Brooke: The Handsomest Young Man In England' is a comprehensive scrapbook of Brooke's world and acquaintances (with, for no good reason, two identical photographs of T E Hume) but the text is poor. Better biographies include Nigel Jones’ 'Rupert Brooke: Life, Death and Myth' (1999).

In the years before the First World War Brooke founded the 'Neo-Pagans', a small middle-class grouping of friends that were part answer to Germany's Wandervogel and part back-to-nature ramblers. Paul Delaney's 1987 book The Neo-pagans: Friendship and Love in the Rupert Brooke Circle looks at the group in detail although its main selling point was the first publication of a Brooke letter graphically detailing a homosexual encounter.

Brooke preferred girls overall but had a nightmarish time of it. One relationship with Catherine 'Ka' Cox led to an abortion. Brooke had a mental breakdown. It did not help that Cox was entangled with the Lytton Strachey's Bloomsbury set, the effete imitators of all things artistic and French, and a whirlpool of sexual ambiguity that Brooke was trying to escape.

Cox would later die mysteriously in west Cornwall. Writer Paul Newman has investigated the rumours that link the death with occultist Aleister Crowley in 'The Tregerthen Horror'. Crowley, essentially an 1890s figure, who became known as the 'Wickedest man in the World' by the tabloids for his very public experiments with Golden Dawn ritual magic using sex and drugs, has many biographies. Two of the most recent are by Tobias Churton and Richard Kaczynski.

Brooke was well-off enough to travel to Germany, America and Tahiti in the years before the First World War but his money could not compare with the truly wealthy aristocracy. Julian Grenfell, the son of Lady Desborough and product of Eton and Oxford University, gets a sympathetic portrait in Nicholas Mosley's 1976 biography.

A man of action with a poetic side to him Grenfell tried hard to give meaning to his privileged life with a book of philosophy. Its rejection by publishers, orchestrated by his concerned mother, led to a breakdown. When he recovered Grenfell rejoined the parentally approved path and signed up with the army.

In 1914 he enthusiastically threw himself into the war, his letters home describing it as a 'picnic' and full of hunting talk. He liked war. His poem 'Into Battle', is an enthusiastic praise of combat that combines Nietzsche with English pastoralism and has been much criticised by pacifists since. He also wrote poems attacking the 'red faced majors at the base', in Siegfried Sassoon's phrase, but these are less well known.

Grenfell died in 1915, hit by a shell splinter. Brooke died earlier the same year of disease en route to the Gallipoli campaign. In 1916 the short story writer Hector Hugh Munro ('Saki') was killed by a German sniper in France. His last words, to a comrade: 'Put that bloody cigarette out!'

It was the kind of black humour that would have been appreciated by a man whose mother was killed by a cow and whose elegant, malicious short stories are still fresh today. Munro was less wealthy than Grenfell and Brooke but from the same background. He perfected the languid, cigarette held between drooping fingers aesthete's pose but underneath was a tough man, right-wing even by Edwardian Imperialist standards. He worked as a journalist, notably in Tsarist Russia, before finding his role as a short story writer. He was homosexual to his fingertips. AJ Langguth’s 1982 biography has the full story. The war seemed to Munro, like many others, a chance to throw off stale, soft civilian life and re-invent himself as a soldier. He refused a commission.


Roaring Twenties
Denys Finch Hatton bridged the Edwardian and Twenties eras. Another golden youth, he attended Eton with other upper class sons of privilege like Grenfell, Patrick Shaw-Stewart and the devoutly Catholic Ronald Knox. He did languid, disinterest in worldly success charisma better than anyone. At a university golf match he gave his opponent an advantage and was heckled from the crowd by an outraged professor: 'Remember you are playing for your college not for yourself!'

Born into wealth, country houses and vast estates Hatton had little interest in competition.

'Remember you are playing for neither,' he replied.

Hatton was charismatic but slipped through life so elegantly that he seems more shadow than man. Sara Wheeler’s' 2006 biography 'Too Close to the Sun: The Life and Times of Denys Finch Hatton' devotes most of its pages to Karen Blixen, neurotic Danish author of 'Out Of Africa' (many years later a Robert Reford/Meryl Streep film) and Hatton's lover.

The pair met in Kenya where Hatton decamped before the First World War to fail as a farmer but succeeded as a Great White Hunter. He brought down leaping lions with seconds to spare on rich men's safaris, useful experience for the now forgotten East African campaign of the Great War. The only front in the war where a fire fight between British and German troops was disrupted by a charging rhino.

'Close To The Sun' succeeds despite the absence of its subject because the scenery and supporting cast come to vivid life. Africa is a character, all orange sunsets and chattering wildlife. The day players are well drawn. Colonel Richard Meinertzhagen fought alongside Hatton in the Africa campaign but the splenetic old Africa hand is best know for his pre-war peace negotiations with a rebellious tribe. He arranged a meeting, strode forward to shake the rebel chief's hand then pulled a revolver with his spare paw and shot the man. Meinertzhagen got the Victoria Cross. Brian Garfield's 'The Meinertzhagen Mystery: The Life and Legend of a Colossal Fraud' (2007) debunks many of the old soldier’s adventures. Meinertzhagen later claimed members of the Tsar's family escaped the Bolsheviks and that he tried to assassinate Hitler. He discovered the Giant Forest Hog (Hylochoerus meinertzhageni).

Hatton was peripherally linked with the dissolute Happy Valley set of 1920s Kenya. Never too decadent himself - he preferred to spend his evenings with the classics and a gramophone, although he had a fondness for the Ballets Russe - Hatton occasionally mixed with Josslyn Victor Hay, 22nd Earl of Erroll, the Valley's leading light. Blond haired charmer Erroll had hero worshipped the older man at Eton. Out in Africa Erroll went through other men's wives at a rapid pace but avoided the cocaine and morphine used by others in his circle.

James Fox's 1982 'White Mischief' tells the Happy Valley story as he tries to puzzle out who shot Erroll in the head at close range at a deserted cross roads one night in 1940. Was it Diana Broughton, Erroll's latest lover? Or Sir Henry ‘Jock’ Broughton, Diana's cuckold husband who was charged, acquitted and committed suicide? The book spawned 'White Mischief' the movie with Charles Dance as Erroll, an actor who has perfected the art of the disinterested glance.

Errol Trzebinski’s 2000 'The Life and Death of Lord Erroll: The Truth Behind the Happy Valley Murder' claims the dead man's brief membership of Oswald Mosley's British Union of Fascists led the Secret Services to assassinate him. Not much evidence for that. Mosley himself was another son of privilege who moved from conservative right to socialist Left then out to Fascism. Many books about him but his son Nicholas' 'Rules of the Game/Beyond the Pale: Memoirs of Sir Oswald Mosley and Family' (1991) and Robert Skidelsky's 1975 biography are good. Recent works like Martin Pugh’s 2005 ‘'Hurrah for the Blackshirts!: Fascists and Fascism in Britain Between the Wars' and Stephen Dorril’s 2006 'Blackshirt: Sir Oswald Mosley and British Fascism' were well reviewed.

The best answer to the Erroll murder was given by 2005 BBC programme 'Julian Fellowes Investigates A Most Mysterious Murder' – The Case of the Earl of Errol’ in which the aristocrat actor/screen writer claimed Jock Broughton really was responsible. Wife Diane was in the car at the time and had to wear a scarf after to hide the bullet track in her neck. Fellowes claimed to speak from personal knowledge.

Another murdered wartime aristocrat was Sir Harry Oakes whose mysterious 1943 death in the Bahamas - bludgeoned and burned in his bed - spawned a host of conspiracy theories. James Owen's 'A Serpent in Eden: The Greatest Murder Mystery of All Time' (2006) is a readable account of the murder and subsequent trial of Oakes' son-in-law Count Alfred de Marigny, a dubiously titled Mauritian of French descent, who like Jock Broughton escaped gaol despite much suspicion. Respectable Bahamians were put off by his two-tone ‘co-respondent’ shoes.

The wife-swapping Happy Valley set were a dark reflection of England's Bright Young Things. DJ Taylor's 'Bright Young People' (2007) is a comprehensive look at the media darlings who partied through the 1920s, most aristocrats, most rich. Bottle parties, swimming pool parties, paper chases, fatal car crashes, tuxedos and Brilliantine. Taylor's book exhausts the seam of London's fun loving rich in the roaring twenties.

A few of the more outstanding BYTs deserve their own books. Lawrence Whistler's book on his brother Rex, 1975’s 'Laughter and the Urn', describes a talented artist who decorated the Tate Gallery dining room in Roccoco style and was brought into the BYT world through his friendship with Stephen Tennant. The son of Scottish peer Lord Glenconner, Tennant was aesthete of the aesthetes and campest of the camp, although he lacked any other talents. He was war hero and poet Seigfreid Sasoon's great love. Phillip Hoare’s 1992 biography 'Serious Pleasures: Life of Stephen Tennant' is a heavy weight account of a feather light life.

Part-time BYT, and advisor to Fox's 'White Mischief', Cyril Connolly was a famously underachieving old Etonian who investigated the Erroll case in the 1960s for a magazine article. Connolly did Eton and Oxford in the twenties but came to prominence the following decade. He went through a number of wives, the most tempestuous being Barbara Skelton. At a dinner party where Connolly was making a pig of himself, with food round his mouth:

Skelton: [contemptuously] What’s that on your face?
Connolly: Hate.

His best remembered work, 1938's 'Enemies of Promise', is a portmanteau of literary criticism and public school memoir. Short pieces 'Where Engels Fears To Tread', a parody of upper class BYT aesthete turned Communist Brian Howard, and ‘Death of an Elizabethan', a surprisingly reverent review of a memoriam book on a right-wing aristocrat pilot who died young, stand up better. They can be found in 'The Condemned Playground', a 1944 collection of essays with a frightening drawing of Connolly by Augustus John as frontispiece. Brian Howard is the subject of Marie-Jaqueline Lancaster's 1968’s 'Brian Howard: Portrait of a Failure'.

Howard and Connolly were contemporaries of Evelyn Waugh, the dominant literary novelist of the twenties. Waugh was not aristocratic but liked to associate with them. Selina Hasting's 1994 biography is a monumental account of the misanthropic aesthete but his circle at Oxford Univeristy is better brought to life in Martin Stannard’s 1987 'Evelyn Waugh: The Early Years, 1903-39' and Humphrey Carpenter’s 1992 'The Brideshead Generation: Evelyn Waugh and His Friends'. Oxford provided the material for much of Waugh's best seller 'Brideshead Revisited'' - languid men of 'convenient bisexuality', in writer Anthony Powell's words, blazing through family fortunes on the manicured lawns of Oxford colleges.

It was a world of champagne bottles, limited poetry editions, Victoriana obsessions and gay crushes. 'Brideshead Revisited' was an extensive ITV series in 1981, and a less successful 2008 film. Waugh's 1930 'Vile Bodies' was made into a 2003 film by Stephen Fry as 'Bright Young Things'. Watchable but Fry softens Waugh's sharp edges. The novel was written while Waugh's marriage to Evelyn Gardener was falling apart. She ran off with a BBC employee called John Heyward. Waugh wrote a 1959 biography of Catholic priest Ronald Knox, one of the rare survivors from Denys Finch Hatton’s pre-war circle.

Powell's own 1983 memoirs 'To Keep the Ball Rolling' provide a clinically detached look at the time. Bevis Hiller’s 1984 biography of John Betjeman's early years (Young Betjeman) has much on the mix of snobbery, aestheticism, and reaction that made up the lives of the rich in Oxford at the time. Also worth checking out are 'Poet Ed' about Edward James, fabulously rich Oxford man and patron of Surrealism, and Mark Amory’s 1988 biography of 'Lord Berners: The Last Eccentric'. Like Hatton, Berners was a bridging figure between Edwardian aristocracy and twenties Bright Young Things, although unlike him also fat, eccentric, musical, and homosexual. Both books are light on atmosphere but fill in the gaps.

Harold Acton's 1948 'Memoirs of an Aesthete' should have been essential from the poet who was the central figure in that circle but are instead a rather dim reflection of that time. Acton declaimed poetry through a megaphone (an Edith Sitwell touch) to rowers returning from the Isis.

Some of the Brideshead generation were made of tough stuff, like Robert Byron, subject of James Knox’s 2003 biography. Angry homosexual Byron travelled widely, wrote well on architecture, and hated Nazis and Turks. His 1937 'The Road to Oxiana' is still in print and was Bruce Chatwin's favourite book.

Not everyone stayed in Britain. In the twenties Paris throbbed with avant garde art, a cheap cost of living and loose morals. American and British writers and artists, some even talented, descended on the bohemian sectors to live life to the full. Englishman English painter Christopher Wood juggled an in depth knowledge of the latest French techniques with bisexuality and opium addiction. Jean Cocteau liked him. He returned to England and spent time in Cornwall, then in the early days of its life as an artist colony. His work is faux-naif. In 1930 Wood threw himself under a train. Richard Ingleby’s 1995 biography is thorough. Sebastian Faulkes included him as one of his three portraits in the same year's 'The Fatal Englishman'.

For an American version see Harry Crosby, scion of a wealthy Boston family but prominent in the avant garde Paris art world of the 1920s with Black Sun Press, publishing Ernest Hemingway among others. Crosby abused drugs, wife swapped, and made dramatic gestures. His poetry was limited. He died in a 1929 suicide pact with his mistress in a friend's New York apartment. Geoffrey Wolff’s biography 'Black Sun: The Brief Transit and Violent Eclipse of Harry Crosby' (1977) is excellent.


Hungry Thirties
Martin Green's 1976 'Children of the Sun: A Narrative of Decadence in England After 1918' is an unconvincing attempt to connect the aesthetes of the twenties with the Fascists of the thirties. Its main attraction is a nice photograph of Randolph Churchill as a young man before Winston's son got fat and red-faced. Randolph has never had a critical enough biographer to turn in a good book on this ultimate son of privilege. His own son's 1996 biography is anaemic, while an earlier anthology of recollections 'The Young Unpretender' (1971), edited by Kay Halle, entertaining but all surface.

The rich kept their heads down in the Hungry Thirties as political extremes ramped up across Europe. Denys Finch Hatton's old schoolmate Ronald Knox and social climbing Jesuit Martin D'Arcy converted some, including Evelyn Waugh, to Catholicism. A few went political. Roger Griffiths' 1980 'Fellow Travellers Of The Far-Right' gives a good summary of the extreme right fringe, with a fair sprinkling of titled names.

Yuri Modin’s My Five Cambridge Friends about Philby and co gives an inside look at the militant left version. The Spanish Civil War radicalised many. Stansky & Abrahams’ 'Journey to the Frontier' (1966) details the lives of John Cornford and Julian Bell, the first a Communist, the second a fellow traveller. Cornford was a good conventional poet whose dedication to Marx gives his verse real attack ('Understand the weapon/ understand the wound'). Poetry ran in the family - his mother Frances was a friend of Rupert Brooke and wrote the 'Apollo golden haired' quatrain about him. Bell was a less talented poet who knew many of the Cambridge spy ring around Philby. Both died in Spain.

Rupert Bellville was one of the few who fought in Spain for Franco. The heir to Papillon Hall, a Leicestershire country house redesigned by Edward Lutyens but already crumbling, the argumentative pilot joined the Spanish Falange militia in the early days of the war thanks to contacts in the Andalusian sherry industry. He was best known for arriving in Santander by aeroplane to congratulate the victorious Nationalist troops only to find it was still in the hands of the Republicans. He narrowly escaped a firing squad. Oxford graduate Peter Kemp contributed more to Franco's cause, first in the Carlist Requetes and later in the Foreign Legion. Those two and others can be found in my 'Franco's International Brigades: Adventurers, Fascists, and Christian Crusaders in the Spanish Civil War' (2013).


Second World War
BYT Rex Whistler died just after D-Day in France. Cecil Beaton heard he got drunk and fell under a lorry but the truth was a more heroic end as a tank commander during a mortar barrage. The apparent fading of the aristocracy was commemorated in Waugh's 'Brideshead Revisited' and also in Keith Douglas' wartime poem 'Aristocrats', although with greater distance. Douglas himself was a man of action, leaning leftwards but entranced by rightist sentiments of army discipline and patriotism. He also died just after D-Day. Desmond Graham's 1974 Keith Douglas, 1920-1944: A Biography is thorough.

Others let the side down. John Amery, son of Secretary of State for India Leopold Amery, was in France when it fell. He threw his lot in with the Germans, broadcast propaganda to Britain and tried to organise a British Waffen-SS unit. Caught in Italy at the end of the war, by future television personality Alan Whicker, Amery was hanged for Treason. Adrian Weale covers British traitors in 'Renegades: Hitler's Englishmen' (1994). A good read but his composite biography of Amery and Sir Roger Casement, 'Patriot Traitors' (2001), is best avoided.

Bad things also happened on the home front. Neville Heath just pretended to be a gentleman. A fantasist RAF pilot with a taste for whipping young girls, he killed at least two during the war and was hanged for it. Francis Selwyn lifts the stone in 1988’s 'Rotten to the Core: Life and Death of Neville Heath', as does Sean O'Connor in the 2013 'Handsome Brute: The Story of a Ladykiller'.

On the winning side John Heyward emerged out of the jungles of Burma with a native bride, less than five feet high and bought from one of the 'more primitive tribes' - at least according to Anthony Powell. The man for whom Evelyn Waugh's wife left him, Heyward deserves a biography of his own. Something of a womaniser, he toured Europe in the twenties and thirties, married the former Mrs Waugh and was sacked from the BBC for his involvement in the divorce. He leant to the right and had an exciting war in the Far East. Post-war he drank himself into a stupor and eventually committed suicide. Powell’s unofficial biographer Michael Barber provides glimpses of an interesting character.

Barber's biography of Powell (2004) is relatively tame, the estate not being particularly helpful as they had Hilary Spurling in the wings for an official version. Barber's writing is as elegant and juicy as always but his prose is better served in the 1996 biography 'The Captain'. Its subject is an inferior writer to Powell but far more interesting person, the frankly satanic Simon Raven ...


Post-War
'Is it true you like both men and women?' an officer asked Simon Raven during the writer's doomed attempt at a career in the British Army after the Second World War.
'I like all four kinds.'
'Four kinds?'
'Male and female. Amateur and professional.'

Raven attended Charterhouse public school but was forced to leave a few terms early for homosexual adventures too blatant for the authorities to ignore. Raven joined the army for National Service just as the empire ended in India, much to his disappointment ('I liked the sound of Sahib Raven'). On release he made it through Cambridge University seducing students of both sexes. He got Susan Kilner pregnant so did the decent thing by marrying her. They lived separate lives, an arrangement aided by Raven rejoining the Army. He was shifted around a number of colonial hotspots, like the Mau Mau rebellion in Kenya, where he did his best to avoid too much action before being kicked out for gambling debts. A telegram once arrived from Susan: 'Mother and baby starving STOP Please send money soonest'.

'Sorry no money STOP,' he replied. 'Suggest eat baby'.

Or so the story goes. It says something about Raven's capacity for scandalous behaviour that even his friends liked to tell the telegram story. He was happy to repay the favour and one of his memoirs was pulped after libel proceedings. Raven was a gifted writer with a flowing, exact style that owed equal amounts to a Classical education and a love of Evelyn Waugh's early work. His plotting and characterisation could not always keep up. Much of his extremely limited success was due to the louche tone of his early novels - homosexual army affairs and murder (first book 'The Feathers of Death', 1959), right-wing secret societies (the same year’s not very good 'Brother Cain'), and sexual vampires (1960’s 'Doctors Wear Scarlet' made into under funded 1970 psychedelic horror movie 'Incense For The Damned' aka 'Blood Suckers').

His reputation rests on roman fleuve 'Alms for Oblivion' written in conscious imitation of Powell's superior 'A Dance to the Music of Time' series, which had begun thirteen years earlier in 1951. Raven does high class sleaze like no-one else but the best books are 1966’s 'Sabre Squadron', a thriller set in Allied occupied Germany informed by Raven's own posting there, although let down by an incompletely imagined central Jewish character, and 'Fielding Gray' (1967), the definitive dark side of public school novel, whose plot influenced Stephen Fry's 1991 debut novel 'The Liar'.

Raven lived precariously, bouncing checks, writing novels, and dining well. By the 60s the slim, vulpine army officer had become round and red-faced. He was kept afloat through the generosity of his publisher Anthony Blond, like Raven bisexual, unlike him rich. His memoirs 'Jew Made in England' (2004) are disjointed but never dull, particularly on his friendships with the more raffish figures in the post-war world. He knew Alan Clark before the historian became a Tory MP. The clipped, arrogant and athletic Clark was son of Lord Clark (of cultural tv series 'Civilisation' fame - the book version, illustrated or not, is a good read). Clark once told Blond he lived in Albany, the set of bachelor apartments in central London, because it needed only a single word of direction to a taxi driver.

'Two words,' said Blond.

Clark looked puzzled.

Blond explained - 'Albany, please.'

Clark's Diaries ('Into Politics', 'In Power', and 'The Last Diaries' - 2000, 1993 and 2002 respectively) mix politics, cars, affairs and hypochondria, and make a more sympathetic figure of Clark than many thought possible. A 2009 authorised biography by Ion Trewin provided a fuller picture. Reviewers were polarised, less by the book than by their reactions to Clark's personality.


Aspinall & Co
Blond was also friends with John Aspinall and James Goldsmith from his days at Oxford. All were part of a hard drinking, hard gambling set. Aspinall and Goldsmith were ambitious and wanted to be rich. Aspinall went on make his money in gambling, first with floating Chemin de Feu games around Mayfair and then with the Clermont Club in Berkley Square. Goldsmith became an international asset stripper, admired and hated.

Douglas Thompson's 2007 'The Hustlers: Gambling, Greed and the Perfect Con' is a good account of Aspinall's career up until the sale of the Clermont Club in the late 1960s. Great cast of gambling characters - Lord Derby ('a failing salesman in a rented dinner jacket,' according to Simon Raven who once won £900 at Chemmy in the late 50s, subsequently losing a lot more), SAS founder David Stirling who shrugged off a loss of £174,500 in one night during 1959, and John Bingham, Lord Lucan ('thick as two planks,' according to Mark Birley, founder of Annabel's nightclub) soon to be wanted for murder.

Thompson does a good job even though he describes a louche 50s resort in France where British aristocrats and gangsters mixed with European playboys and actresses as a place 'you could lie on the beach and look at the stars or vice versa'. The book attracted controversy with its revelation that Aspinall routinely cheated gamblers at the Clermont with the help of Billy Hill, London's top gangster. Aspinall's family denied it, his business partner confirmed it.

'The Real Casino Royale' was a 2009 Channel 4 documentary based on Thompson's book. The interviews and archive footage are good, the reconstructions less convincing. The actor playing Lucan looks more like Kaiser Wilhelm and Billy Hill's hat is inexplicably four sizes too big. Back in 2000 Adam Curtis created ‘The Mayfair Set’ for the BBC, a documentary on Thatcherite capitalism that used the regulars of the Clermont Club as its hook. Goldsmith got the lion's share of the spotlight. The four parter is Curtis' usual mix of insight, archive footage and conspiracy theory.

Meanwhile up the road in Cadogan Square, November 1971, an expatriate American mother and son had a row. The son stabbed his mother to death. Barbara Bakeland was fabulously rich, married into the family that invented Bakelite, but had eccentric ideas about curing son Anthony of his homosexuality. She slept with him. This did not help his paranoid schizophrenia. The tale is told well in 'Savage Grace: The True Story of a Doomed Family' (1985) an oral biography by Natalie Robbins and Steven M L Aronson. It was turned into a movie in 2007.

The Clermont had passed into the hands of the Playboy organisation by 1974 when Lord Lucan attempted to murder his estranged wife but killed the children's nanny Sandra Rivett by mistake. By this time his gambling debts were so high he worked as a house gambler for Aspinall. And he drank. Surprisingly few books have been written about the crime although it gripped the country and, with Lucan vanished the night of the murder and never seen again, continues to fascinate. Most books are written by retired policemen to boost their pensions and hinge on new theories about Lucan's whereabouts ie. MacLaughlin and Hall’s discredited 'Dead Lucky - Lord Lucan: The Final Truth' (2003).

John Pearson's 2005 'The Gamblers' is a joint biography of Aspinall and Goldsmith and those around them but has a fairly clear overview of the Lucan murders. 'Bloodlines', a straight to DVD 1997 movie made with Irish money, is a well informed dramatisation although it goes off the rails at the end with Lucan battling gangsters on a cliff top. It follows, at least partly, Pearson's theory that Lucan was killed by gangsters - presumably linked to Billy Hill, although this is never explicitly stated.

Another Clermont gambler accused of murder, Claus von Bulow was acquitted of the 1979 murder of his wife. 'Reversal Of Fortune', a 1991 Hollywood movie of the trial based on attorney Alan Dershowitz's book, is watchable. Jeremy Irons exudes Von Bulow's dark charm:

Dershowitz: We have one thing in our favour.
Von Bulow: What's that?
Dershowitz: Everybody hates you.
Von Bulow: [Swallows a mouthful of food, gestures with his fork] It's a start.

James Goldsmith ended his days with a luxurious Mexican hideaway, more money than he knew what to do with and the Reform Party, a vehicle to bash pro-European MPs. Hutchins & Midgley's 1998 biography 'Goldsmith: Money, Women and Power' is the latest available. He died in 1997 of cancer. He outlived Aspinall, Billy Hill and most of his gambling cronies, including the weak willed artist Dominic Elwes, who he helped drive to suicide for a perceived betrayal to the press after the Lucan murders. Elwes was father to actor Cary, star of 1984's 'Another Country' about public school boys discovering homosexuality and Communism in the thirties.

To everyone's surprise Raven outlived them all. The novels declined in quality as he got older but he made money working on television drama scripts. His last words in hospital were 'Who's paying for all this, I'd like to know?'

Not everyone was dressed up in a dinner jacket losing money at Berkley Square. In the 1960s Robert Fraser was a top modern art dealer, friend of the Rolling Stones (present at the Redlands bust) and heroin addict. While learning the art trade in early 1960s New York he impressed friends by dropping coin change on the floor as not worth carrying around. Harriet Vyner’s 1999 oral biography 'Groovy Bob: The Life and Times of Robert Fraser' is a good read. In the seventies he headed for India and AIDS.


Africa and Elsewhere
Darker Englishmen were about by the time of Lucan's disappearance. In fiction Frederick Forsythe's anonymous English assassin in 1971's 'The Day of the Jackal' summed up the new type of ruthless, amoral and probably dangerously rightist well spoken types. The 1973 film with Edward Fox was good.

Andy Beckett’s 2002 book 'Pinochet in Piccadilly: Britain and Chile's Hidden History' covers the real life ground, although at heart it is an overgrown article about links between Margaret Thatcher and Chilean dictator General Pinochet pumped up with speculation about right-wingers around David Stirling in the 1970s. 'The Wilson Plot: How the Spycatchers and Their American Allies Tried to Overthrow the British Government' provides background to Stirling's activities with allegations that members of the establishment believed Labour Prime Minister Harold Wilson was a KGB agent.

But golden youths made a comeback with writer Bruce Chatwin. Educated, talented, bisexual Chatwin had made his mark at auctioneers Sotheby’s but burst onto the wider world as journalist and author. His icy, etched style and love of the esoteric – from nomads to Ernst Junger, Russian Futurism to Jackie Kennedy - made him great but in his lifetime he was known primarily as a travel writer. Non-fiction 1989 collection 'What am I Doing Here' is essential, 1988 novel 'Utz' good and Nicholas Shakespeare's 1999 biography very good.

Chatwin loved Africa and experienced the grim aftermath of an attempted 1976 coup in Benin when he was suspected of being one of the foreign mercenaries involved under the command of Frenchman Bob Denard, who tells his side of the story in 'Corsaire de la Republique'.

Forsythe's third novel 'The Dogs of War' about overthrowing a corrupt African dictatorship was based on his apparently real attempt to put together an earlier coup in Equatorial Guinea. Thirty years later Englishman Simon Mann tried the same deal with the help of, among others, Mark Thatcher - son of the former Prime Minister and ultimate remittance man. The coup went wrong and Mann ended up in a hellhole jail in Equatorial Guinea. The tale is told well in 'The Wonga Coup: Simon Mann's Plot to Seize Oil Billions in Africa' by Adam Roberts (2006).

For a fictionalised account of recent black sheep see Edward St Aubyn's three semi-autobiographical novels 'Never Mind', 'Bad News' and 'Some Hope', most recently combined in 2006's 'Some Hope: A Triology'. The 1982 film 'Privileged' about rich types at Oxford University has its fans. Woody Allen’s 'Match Point' (2005) should not work, with its luxurious London apartments masquerading as down market hovels, unsubtle Dostoevsky references, and rich families who like both the opera and Andrew Lloyd Weber. But it succeeds because Allen, inadvertently, taps into a fantasy of London upper class life that bears little relation to the truth but feels like a warm champagne bath to anyone who enjoyed 'Brideshead Revisited'' and wants a version with mobile phones and murder. All that despite the script originally having been set in the Hamptons.

For other American film versions of this type see Whit Stillman's 1990 'Metropolitan' and 1998 'The Last Days of Disco'. Also the off-beat take of 'A New Leaf' (1971) with Walther Mathau, oddly convincing as a playboy running short of money, despite having a face like a bulldog chewing a wasp.


Dealing With Grimes

Well, there you have it. One hundred years of bankrupt aristocrats, corrupt golden youths, and frankly untrustworthy remittance men. Perhaps it gave you some ideas. Grimes is due soon. Best pick a spot to greet him. By the roaring fireplace, beneath the portrait of the seventh Earl? Or looking reflectively at the Big Game trophies on the wall, with their brass plaques? That gazelle put a bit of a fight. Or perhaps behind the door with a poker in your hand? Yes, that might be the best place. Bon chance old chap. Give Grimes my regards.