Meghan is "narcissistic and sociopathic", reads in a new biography about William and Harry
Historian Robert Lacey, who became popular for his consulting work for The Crown, has a new book in which he reveals details about what separated the inseparable William and Harry.
Carla B. Ribeiro
June 21, 2021, 12:59
A staff member wrote that "Meghan was ruled by fear"
Brothers William and Harry have over the years been seen as inseparable, revealing complicity, possibly explained by the trauma they survived side by side, following their mother's violent death following a car accident. It was clear that they had very different ways of being, but they revealed unconditional support for each other. And when Kate entered the equation, nothing changed. Until Meghan has arrived, she defends Robert Lacey's book Battle of Brothers: William and Harry - The Inside Story of a Family in Tumult, which arrives revised, updated and with six new chapters on June 24.
In this biography, the excerpts of which are being published by the reputed The Times, the complaints made by royal officials against Meghan Markle during her time in Kensington, the palace the two couples have even shared, citing many emails sent, which reads that Meghan is "narcissistic and sociopathic".
And the complaints come to the highest levels, with Jason Knauf, communications secretary at Kensington Palace, expressing "concern at the countless stories of mistreatment brought to him by colleagues he knew well and trusted." In a 2018 correspondence with Prince William's private secretary Simon Case, Knauf expressed concern that the Duchess "was able to intimidate two assistants" the previous year to the point of pushing them away.
In that same message, Jason Knauf describes Meghan's behavior as "totally unacceptable", adding that "the Duchess seems to want to always have someone in her sights". A staff member wrote that "Meghan was ruled by fear." "Nothing was ever good enough for her. He humiliated the staff at the meetings, [yelled at] them, [cut off] access to e-mail – and then demanded to know why they had done nothing."
Until, when asked about her attitudes, she replied in writing, "It is not my place to spoil people."
It would have been all these episodes that led to William having "a furious confrontation" with Brother Harry and decided to separate all the aspects that the two couples had previously shared in kensington management. According to Robert Lacey, William called his younger brother as soon as he became aware of the complaints, and Harry defended the woman. The Duke of Cambridge then decided to have this conversation in person, which led to a violent confrontation: on the one hand William, who considered Meghan's behaviour unacceptable; on the other, Harry was "furious that William had given credit" to the bullying allegations made against the woman.
At the time, the image was made that the departure from Kensington Palace had been a choice of the Dukes of Sussex, but in this book Robert Lacey states that it was William who drove the couple away from the property where they resided.
The complaints against Meghan regarding the way she would treat staff are not new, and in March this year Buckingham Palace hired an outside firm to conduct an independent inquiry into the bullying allegations. According to The Times, the Palace determined that the inquiry would not "be conducted in public" and that it would not have a deadline.
At the time, Meghan's spokesperson said that "the Duchess regrets this latest attack on her character, particularly as she is someone who has been bullied and has a deep commitment to supporting people who have the same pain."
Days later, in an interview with Oprah Winfrey, Harry said that William and his father, Prince Charles, were "trapped" in royal duties, adding that if it hadn't been for Meghan, he would have been. "I was trapped, but I didn't know ... My father and brother are trapped. You can't leave, and I have a great deal of compassion for it."
In the same conversation, there were accusations of racism directed at an unidentified member of the royal family. And that's all William reacted to, ignoring the remaining accusations: "We're not a racist family."
Robert Lacey, 77, is a British historian, author of several successful biographies, including henry ford, eileen ford and queen Elizabeth II, working as a historical consultant for netflix's award-winning series The Crown, the fifth season of which is not expected to be available until 2022.
9 Royal Tabloid Controversies Explained in Robert Lacey’s Battle of Brothers
In the new book about the rift between Prince Harry and Prince William, the British press might just be the third most important character.
BY ERIN VANDERHOOF
OCTOBER 21, 2020
In his new book, Battle of the Brothers: William and Harry—The Inside Story of a Family in Tumult, Robert Lacey, royal expert and historical consultant to the The Crown, tells the story of the recent schism separating Prince Harry and Meghan Markle from the rest of the royal family from the very beginning: when Prince Charles and Princess Diana first met. According to Lacey, the roots of Harry’s eventual disillusionment are seen pretty clearly in the cold and difficult relationship between his parents and the ways his mother pushed back against royal strictures.
The story of Charles and Diana has been told before, and so has the story of Meghan and Harry. But in his version, Lacey takes a closer look at the way the press itself shaped the lives of the people they were writing about as everything unfolded. He examines how the family participated with the press, reporting that Camilla Parker-Bowles, now the Duchess of Cornwall, had a weekly telephone appointment with a journalist from the Sun throughout the 80s, where she would share tidbits she gleaned from her phone conversations with Charles. He also discusses the way explosive press battles between Charles and Diana had an impact on William and Harry’s upbringing. In one poignant moment, Lacey writes that William’s boarding school had subscriptions to national newspapers, but on a day his parents’ arguments led the news, they were not distributed to the students to avoid causing him distress.
Treating the press as a significant force—and some of the leading royal correspondents as characters—means that Lacey brings a new eye to some of the biggest tabloid controversies and mysteries of the last quarter century. Here are some of the most fascinating ones.
William welcomed Camilla into the family—but she was surprised by his temper. Camilla remained friendly with Charles throughout his marriage to Diana, and though there is some debate about when their affair began, Lacey reports that William and Harry never met their future stepmother until after Diana’s death. They did know about her, and William finally met her in 1998 when he made a surprise visit to Charles and Camilla at home. Though he was friendly, the meeting stressed Camilla out. “I need a gin and tonic,” she told a friend she said afterward, before pouring herself a double. After his parents split, William was angry at Charles and the tension seemingly lingered for decades. Camilla later told friends that she was alarmed by William’s screaming and fiery temper when he got into it with Charles.
There’s a chance Kate only decided to go to St. Andrews after she heard William was going. A long-forgotten tabloid controversy centers on the exact timeline of Kate’s application to the university where she eventually met William. In August 2000, William’s decision to attend St. Andrew’s to study the history of art was made public. At first, Kate had applied and had committed to Edinburgh University, where some of her friends were planning to go. Sometime in late August or September, according to Lacey, Kate changed her mind and decided to defer for a year and apply to St. Andrew’s, and her high school made her write a formal letter to Edinburgh to apologize. Lacey isn’t sure exactly what her motivations were, but he points out that applications for female students jumped 44% after William announced his choice. Even if Kate did apply because she harbored a slight crush on the prince who was already a global star, she certainly wasn’t alone. Who among us, Lacey concludes, wouldn’t do the same?
The tiara fight before Meghan’s wedding to Harry really happened—but it was way more complicated than previously reported. In November 2018, rumors that Meghan was denied her choice in tiara first erupted, adding to the narrative that the palace referred to her as “Duchess Difficult.” Subsequent versions of the story have cast doubt on the fact that Meghan was even there at all, and the authors of Finding Freedom, another bombshell biography, claim the fight was between Harry and the Queen Elizabeth’s dresser Angela Kelly about using the tiara for a hair trial. According to Lacey, the queen did say no to a first suggestion made by Meghan because it might have been acquired sketchily after the Russian Revolution and is thus rarely put on display. If Harry questioned his grandmother after that, Lacey thinks it might have only been because he didn’t understand the significance of the tiara.
The Buckingham Palace staff, specifically the queen’s private secretary and his allies, were not fans of Meghan’s. According to Lacey, Meghan joined the family right as a staff shakeup at Buckingham Palace had become contentious. The queen’s longtime right-hand man, Christopher Geidt, had been pushed out of his role, and his replacement, Edward Young, was not as beloved or competent a manager. As a result, unflattering leaks from palace insiders went up considerably starting in late 2017, meaning that some of the venom aimed at Meghan might have been a coincidence. Lacey also believes that Young particularly disliked Meghan and thus saddled her with a light, boring schedule that didn’t allow her to get involved. Her two signature projects from her years at the palace, the cookbook she worked on with Grenfell Tower fire survivors and the issue of British Vogue she guest-edited, were both developed without the help of the palace office, and made some insiders angry.
The Mail on Sunday sent a reporter out to Meghan’s dad once they read about Meghan’s letter to her father in the pages of People. Currently, Meghan is in the middle of a lawsuit with Associated Newspapers, the parent company of the Mail, over their February 2019 decision to publish excerpts of a private letter she wrote to her father. In defense documents, the company has claimed that the fact that an anonymous friend of Meghan mentioned the letter in a People interview means that they had the right to publish it. According to Lacey, they did send a reporter to Thomas Markle’s house in Mexico, trying to track the letter down after reading about it in People. It does give some credence to the argument made by Meghan’s legal team that reporters interfered in her family life in a troubling way.
Harry and Meghan gave the palace no warning before filing their lawsuits against the press—and this was a breaking point for the rest of the family. When Meghan and Harry announced the Associated Newspaper suit and Harry’s decision to sue two organizations over phone hacking, they did it on a website that didn’t belong to the palace. Lacey reports that the palace had no advanced warning about the decision, despite the fact that tradition dictates that a royal family member should ask the queen permission before moving forward on a legal matter. Lacey adds that William, who was already angry at his brother for disregarding tradition when it came to Archie’s birth announcement and Meghan’s British Vogue issue, and the rest of the family saw this as a line in the sand.
Harry did give the palace 10 minutes notice before announcing their royal exit, leading to acrimony and meltdown in the palace. According to Lacey, emotions ran high inside the summit where Harry would negotiate his future with William, Charles, the queen, and a few aides. William was so angry that he refused to join for lunch beforehand, and told friends that he didn’t want to be around to hash out the details. However, a palace insider told Lacey that the decision to strip Harry of all his palace-bestowed honors, like honorary military appointments, was not inevitable and may have been the result of vindictiveness on behalf of Young, the queen’s palace secretary. It also wasn’t inevitable that they be stripped of their ability to use their HRH titles or royal status in order to seek financial independence, but Lacey believes that their impulsive behavior over the last year had made the queen less forgiving than she might have been when she made her decision.