The general
layout of the vest in King Charles II’s time stands as follows: buttons very
closely sewn together arranged in two rows lined the front body of the vest
underneath a wide open coat face.
The new vest was a tight-fit, knee-length garment that followed the line of the coat and was worn underneath it. Made from plain, cheap material, it was supposed to discourage the costly use of lace and muslins, which had previously been worn under men’s jackets. Nine days later, Pepys remarked that “the court is all full of vests” and scheduled an appointment with his own tailor. Ever the rival, French King Louis XIV ordered his footmen to adopt the vest as a way to debase the new English style.
John Evelyn
wrote about waistcoats on October 18, 1666: "To Court, it being the first
time his Majesty put himself solemnly into the Eastern fashion of vest,
changing doublet, stiff collar, bands and cloak, into a comely dress after the
Persian mode, with girdles or straps, and shoestrings and garters into
buckles... resolving never to alter it, and to leave the French mode".
Samuel
Pepys, the diarist and civil servant, wrote in October 1666 that "the King
hath yesterday in council declared his resolution of setting a fashion for
clothes which he will never alter. It will be a vest, I know not well
how". This royal decree provided the first mention of the waistcoat. Pepys
records "vest" as the original term; the word "waistcoat"
derives from the cutting of the coat at waist-level, since at the time of the
coining, tailors cut men's formal coats well below the waist (see dress coat).
An alternative theory is that, as material was left over from the tailoring of
a two-piece suit, it was fashioned into a "waste-coat" to avoid that
material being wasted, although recent academic debate has cast doubt on this
theory.
No comments:
Post a Comment