SEE ALSO IN TWEEDLAND :
https://tweedlandthegentlemansclub.blogspot.com/2013/01/the-horror-of-love-nancy-mitford-and.html
https://tweedlandthegentlemansclub.blogspot.com/2012/04/love-in-cold-climate.html
https://tweedlandthegentlemansclub.blogspot.com/2014/09/the-mitford-sisters-video-bellowthe.html
The Pursuit of Love review – absolutely glorious
Emily Mortimer’s immaculate adaptation of Nancy
Mitford’s bestseller about the madcap Radlett family is an instant classic.
What a magnificent treat to tuck into
Lucy Mangan
@LucyMangan
Sun 9 May
2021 22.00 BST
https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2021/may/09/the-pursuit-of-love-review-absolutely-glorious
For some
reason – but never lack of urging by friends – I have not read any Nancy
Mitford, including her most famous novel The Pursuit of Love, a perennial
bestseller since its publication in 1945.
I have
absorbed the basics, of course, through cultural osmosis. I know she’s one of
the communist rather than fascist ones, and the one that gave us the
distinction between “U” (scent, looking-glass, napkin) and “non-U” (perfume,
mirror, serviette) terms. And that The Pursuit of Love is the one that
introduces us to the madcap (and quite often simply mad) world of the Radlett
family at Alconleigh. The children with their secret society called the Hons
(headquarters in the linen cupboard). The foreigner-hating paterfamilias Uncle
Matthew, who hunts said children with his bloodhounds across the Oxford
countryside. The Bolter – also known as the mother of narrator Fanny, a Radlett
cousin – committed to a vibrant life of serial monogamy since abandoning her
only child to be raised by her sister Emily. The excoriation of female
education for the loss of social graces that result, and the gain of
hockey-exercised “thighs like gateposts”.
All of
these touchstones are found in the first episode of the new, three-part BBC One
adaptation. It is surely destined (as any translation of a classic book to
screen is) to be frowned on by purist fans. But for those of us outside that
select group it is an absolutely glorious hour. Immaculately scripted by Emily
Mortimer (who also plays The Bolter as a sort of aristocratic Petula Gordino
from Dinnerladies, for which choice alone she should be given all possible
awards), it is at first glance a romp. Passionate, headstrong Linda (Lily
James, perfectly pitching a character who could be very, very annoying indeed)
is determined that her life should begin, if not sure how. She “lives in a
world of superlatives” and can be trusted to try to throw herself out of the
nearest window at the slightest provocation. Cousin and best friend Fanny
(Emily Beecham, doing finely-shaded work in a less colourful part) is eager for
life too, though less keen on anyone throwing themselves out of windows in the
process. Father/Uncle Matthew is equally determined that no female offspring of
his should have any kind of life beyond Alconleigh if he can help it. Dominic
West plays him as a genuinely frightening genuine eccentric, without making him
an absolute ogre or descending into caricature.
The hour
moves at pace. The Hons go from linen cupboard to debutante balls and the
London season via a variety of adventures and misadventures. Quite which
category their meeting of the magnificent Lord Merlin (the magnificent Andrew
Scott), the very brightest of bright young things, falls into we will have to
wait and see. In the meantime, after a lunch attended by his dyed pigeons
(“They love it,” he assures the Radletts, who are tenderhearted where animals
if not children are concerned. “Makes them so pretty for each other”) he does
his best to educate the unformed Linda. Alas, her attention is fatally drawn to
the awful scion of a banking family, Tony Kroesig (“Full-blooded Hun!” – Uncle
Matthew), played beautifully repellently by Freddie Fox.
The fun –
and funniness – here is thanks again to such a deft, intelligent and loving
script from Mortimer. It is edged with melancholy, and beneath it all lies a
throb of pain. This is what may convert even the fans most hostile to the idea
of messing with their heroine’s work. It is they, after all, who most lament
Mitford’s dismissal as a light comic novelist (as if this wasn’t hard enough
anyway) and the fact that the book’s insights into thwarted female potential
have become ever more unregarded over the years. The entrenching tool with
which Uncle Matthew hacked eight Germans to death as they emerged from a dugout
in the war hangs over the dinner table, which is funny. The scene in which he
in blind fury overturns the table, beneath which Linda is sheltering from a
likely beating, is not.
The
insistent intertwining of the pain with the laughter, instead of flattening the
tale into a Wodehouse-with-women yarn, makes this adaptation feel like a
classic in its own right. It is a treat for all. Mitfordians – please, do give
it a chance.
1 comment:
Just plain AWFUL. There have been two excellent television productions. Nobody has mentioned them in all the reviews. This one was a typically modernist version in an unsubtle - which the book certainly is and silly way.
Post a Comment